1,589
Views
36
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
BRIEF ARTICLE

Individual differences in cognitive control over emotional material modulate cognitive biases linked to depressive symptoms

, &
Pages 736-746 | Received 31 Aug 2015, Accepted 15 Jan 2016, Published online: 12 Feb 2016
 

ABSTRACT

Deficient cognitive control over emotional material and cognitive biases are important mechanisms underlying depression, but the interplay between these emotionally distorted cognitive processes in relation to depressive symptoms is not well understood. This study investigated the relations among deficient cognitive control of emotional information (i.e. inhibition, shifting, and updating difficulties), cognitive biases (i.e. negative attention and interpretation biases), and depressive symptoms. Theory-driven indirect effect models were constructed, hypothesising that deficient cognitive control over emotional material predicts depressive symptoms through negative attention and interpretation biases. Bootstrapping analyses demonstrated that deficient inhibitory control over negative material was related to negative attention bias which in turn predicted a congruent bias in interpretation and subsequently depressive symptoms. Both shifting and updating impairments in response to negative material had an indirect effect on depression severity through negative interpretation bias. No evidence was found for direct effects of deficient cognitive control over emotional material on depressive symptoms. These findings may help to formulate an integrated understanding of the cognitive foundations of depressive symptoms.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Notes

1. The number of presentations of each trial type did not significantly differ (M = 34.00; SD= 0.92; range: 32.56–34.81), all ps >.05.

2. Word length: Mnegative words = 8.79 (SDnegative words = 1.71), Mpositive words = 8.58 (SDpositive words = 1.97); Word frequency (log frequency per million): Mnegative words = 1.02 (SDnegative words = 0.47), Mpositive words = 1.04 (SDpositive words = 0.62).

3. In addition to the measures reported in this article, the participants completed two emotion regulation questionnaires of positive reappraisal and rumination after the cognitive biases assessment and before the questionnaires. The results on the relations among cognitive biases and emotion regulation are reported elsewhere.

4. Depression levels were not correlated with the total fixation frequency on neutral words, r=−.03, p > .05, suggesting that baseline fixation patterns, and reading times, did not differ as a function of depression severity.

Additional information

Funding

The first two authors (J.E. and I.G.) made equal contributions to this study.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 503.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.