The association between ruminative thinking and negative interpretation bias in social anxiety

ABSTRACT

Cognitive models propose that both, negative interpretations of ambiguous social situations and ruminative thoughts about social events contribute to the maintenance of social anxiety disorder. It has further been postulated that ruminative thoughts fuel biased negative interpretations, however, evidence is rare. The present study used a multi-method approach to assess ruminative processing following a social interaction (post-event processing by self-report questionnaire and social rumination by experience sampling method) and negative interpretation bias (via two separate tasks) in a student sample (n = 51) screened for high (HSA) and low social anxiety (LSA). Results support the hypothesis that group differences in negative interpretations of ambiguous social situations in HSAs vs. LSAs are mediated by higher levels of post-event processing assessed in the questionnaire. Exploratory analyses highlight the potential role of comorbid depressive symptoms. The current findings help to advance the understanding of the association between two cognitive processes involved in social anxiety and stress the importance of ruminative post-event processing.

KEYWORDS:

• Social anxiety
• rumination
• interpretation bias
• post-event processing
• experience sampling

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Notes

1. The complete data set and syntax can be found at https://osf.io/3pqdf/?view_only=239c1ae8216c4e4388451b289e018d63.