ABSTRACT
The present research tested the notion that emotion expression and context perception are bidirectionally related. Specifically, in two studies focusing on moral violations (N = 288) and positive moral deviations (N = 245) respectively, we presented participants with short vignettes describing behaviours that were either (im)moral, (in)polite or unusual together with a picture of the emotional reaction of a person who supposedly had been a witness to the event. Participants rated both the emotional reactions observed and their own moral appraisal of the situation described. In both studies, we found that situational context influenced how emotional reactions to this context were rated and in turn, the emotional expression shown in reaction to a situation influenced the appraisal of the situation. That is, neither the moral events nor the emotion expressions were judged in an absolute fashion. Rather, the perception of one also depended on the other.
KEYWORDS:
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Notes
1. This is a slightly different, but in our view compatible use of the term social appraisal, which more generally refers to the notion that people will not only appraise a situation in relation to their own well-being, they also anticipate the appraisals of others (Manstead & Fischer, Citation2001).
2. We also varied the supposed expertise of the witness (student of moral philosophy or not) for moral matters. However, this manipulation did not result in constant effects and effects that were found explained very little variance. Overall, it seemed that participants did either not take this information into account or were not convinced of the supposed expertise. To facilitate the presentation of the results this factor was dropped from the analyses reported below.