2,544
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Empathic emotion regulation in prosocial behaviour and altruism

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1532-1548 | Received 08 Oct 2019, Accepted 28 May 2020, Published online: 23 Jun 2020
 

ABSTRACT

Emotions evoked in response to others’ distress are important for motivating concerned prosocial responses. But how emotion regulation shapes prosocial responding is not yet well understood. We tested the role of empathic emotion regulation in promoting prosocial motivation and costly donations across two studies, first in a community sample and then in a sample of altruistic kidney donors and a matched comparison sample. Participants engaged in hopeful and distancing reappraisals while viewing images of others in distress, then decided whether to help by donating to charity. Whereas hope was expected to evoke approach-based motivation indexed by increased donations, distance was expected to evoke avoidance-based motivation indexed by decreased donations, via varying effects of the two reappraisals on positive and negative affect. Across both studies, both reappraisals decreased negative affect and hopeful reappraisal increased positive affect. In the community sample, hope resulted in higher donations than distancing. Altruists were more prosocial overall, but the associations between affect and donation behaviour in this group mirrored the hopeful reappraisal in the community sample, suggesting that altruists might adopt this strategy by default. These findings clarify the role of empathic emotion regulation in prosocial behaviour and also independent effects of positive and negative affect.

Acknowledgments

This project was supported by John Templeton Foundation Grant 47861 to AAM. We thank Emily Robertson, Katherine O’Connell, Shivani Goyal, Miriam Crinion, Madeline Smith, and Katrina Zheleznyak for assistance with task preparation, data collection, and analysis. We also thank the participants who contributed their time and energy to this work.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Data availability statement

Data are available through the Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/bju2x/.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by John Templeton Foundation: [Grant Number 47861].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 503.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.