415
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Brief Article

Decentring as a moderator of the associations of anticipatory and post-event processing with social anxiety

ORCID Icon &
Pages 745-752 | Received 07 Nov 2019, Accepted 22 Dec 2020, Published online: 07 Jan 2021
 

ABSTRACT

Recent studies have shown that decentring protects against social anxiety, but no research to date has explored the way it interacts with cognitive risk factors for social anxiety. The present study aimed to examine decentring as a moderator of the association of anticipatory and post-event processing with social anxiety. An unselected student sample (N = 444) completed questionnaires assessing anticipatory/post-event processing, decentring, and social anxiety. The data were analysed with structural equation modelling and the latent moderated structural equations (LMS) method. Results supported the moderating role of decentring in the relationship of anticipatory processing and social anxiety, but did not find evidence of moderation for the association of post-event processing and social anxiety, after accounting for the role of anticipatory processing. Limitations and clinical implications for the protective effects of decentring on social anxiety are discussed.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Notes

1 Consistent with past work, we use decentring as an umbrella term that includes related constructs such as defusion and self-distancing (e.g., Bernstein et al., Citation2015).

2 We considered several relevant covariates, including age, gender, and race/ethnicity, which have been shown to vary based upon social anxiety and decentring (e.g., Caballo et al., Citation2008; Naragon-Gainey et al., Citation2020), as well as GAD symptoms (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 Scale; Spitzer et al., Citation2006) and depression symptoms (Centre for Epidemiological Studies – Depression; Radloff, Citation1977). These symptoms are known to be highly comorbid with social anxiety. However, the pattern, significance, and magnitude of findings was unchanged after including the above covariates, so we report and focus on the more parsimonious analyses that do not include covariates.

3 While we can’t test this definitively, it seems plausible that participants who couldn’t identify such an event would give ratings of zero (“not at all”) on all items. Only seven participants rated all items as “0” on this measure.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 503.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.