452
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Measurement and Evaluation

The Bland-Altman Method Should Not Be Used in Regression Cross-Validation Studies

, , &
Pages 610-616 | Published online: 23 Jan 2013
 

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the bias in the Bland-Altman (BA) limits of agreement method when it is used to validate regression models. Data from 1,158 men were used to develop three regression equations to estimate maximum oxygen uptake (R2 = .40, .61, and .82, respectively). The equations were evaluated in a cross-validation sample of 581 men. The BA means and differences were correlated (p < .001) in the cross-validation sample for each model (r = .55, .39, and .26, respectively), thus demonstrating bias. The BA method is inappropriate for validation of regression models. Validation of regression equations is properly conducted by plotting the residuals against the estimated values and examining the magnitude of the estimation error.

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Daniel P. O'Connor

Please address correspondence concerning this article to Daniel P. O'Connor, University of Houston, 3855 Holman–GAR104, Houston, TX 77204-6015.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.