388
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Is V̇O2peak a Valid Estimation of V̇O2max in Swimmers with Physical Impairments?

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 252-262 | Received 03 Apr 2019, Accepted 21 Aug 2019, Published online: 13 Nov 2019
 

ABSTRACT

Purpose: Peak and maximal oxygen uptake (V˙O2peak and V˙O2max, respectively) are used in assessing aerobic power. For swimmers with physical impairments, it is unclear whether the physiological variables obtained in 200-m and Nx200-m tests are similar. The objective of this study is to assess the validity of V˙O2peak as an estimator of V˙O2max and complementary physiological variables, in particular, carbon dioxide production (V˙CO2), respiratory exchange ratio (RER), minute-ventilation (V˙E) and absolute (HR) and relative (%HRmax) heart rates—which were obtained in a time trial test (200-m) and an incremental intermittent test (Nx200-m) performed by swimmers with physical impairments. Methods: Eleven well-trained swimmers with physical impairments performed 200-m all-out and Nx200-m from low to all-out (controlled by a visual pacer), both with a respiratory valve system and a portable gas analyzer. Results: A paired Student’s t-test showed no statistical difference (p > .05) for all comparisons. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.97 and 0.98 for V˙O2 in l/min and ml/kg/min, respectively; ICC = 0.75 to 0.9 for V˙CO2 (l/min and ml/kg/min), V˙E (in l/min) and HR (beats/min); ICC = 0.5 and 0.75 for %HRmax; and ICC < 0.5 for RER. Passing-Bablok regression showed that the dispersions were acceptable, considering the proportionality, except for HR and %HRmax. Bland-Altman method showed a high level of agreement for all variables. Conclusions: The V˙O2peak and V˙O2max, as well as the physiological variables V˙CO2 and HR obtained, respectively, by 200-m and Nx200-m tests in swimmers with physical impairment were not different.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the support of coaches, athletes, and all those who were involved in this study.

Additional information

Funding

The study was approved by the local ethics committee (number 2.274.037) and was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 213.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.