Reliability and Validity of the 30–15 Intermittent Field Test With and Without a Soccer Ball

ABSTRACT

Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of the 30–15 Intermittent Field Test (30–15_IFT) with and without a ball. Methods: Twenty-four collegiate female soccer players (19.46 ± 1.22 years; 167.01 ± 7.23 cm; 60.95 ± 7.84 kg) performed 1 trial of the Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery (YYIR) test, 3 trials of the 30–15_IFT, and 3 trials of the 30–15_IFT with a ball (30–15_IFT-B), separated by a minimum 48 hours. Maximal intermittent running velocity (V_IFT), heart rate at exhaustion (HR_peak), and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) were collected. Results: Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) between trials demonstrated good reliability during the 30–15_IFT in V_IFT (ICC = 0.88) and HR_peak (ICC = 0.89), in addition to the 30–15_IFT-B V_IFT (ICC = 0.83) and HR_peak (ICC = 0.87). V_IFT was significantly reduced in 30–15_IFT-B (15.82 km h⁻¹) compared to 30–15_IFT (17.52 km h⁻¹; p < .001), regardless of trial. HR and RPE were significantly greater in 30–15_IFT compared to 30–15_IFT-B (p < .05). Estimated maximal oxygen consumption (VO₂max) YYIR and estimated VO₂max of 30–15_IFT and 30–15_IFT-B was very strongly (r = 0.82) and strongly (r = 0.68) correlated. Conclusion: The 30–15_IFT is considered valid and reliable and the 30–15_IFT-B was reliable in female soccer players.

KEYWORDS:

• Cardiorespiratory fitness
• fitness test
• soccer
• talent identification
• technical skill

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

The author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.