Feasibility of Project Mentor: A Mentoring Program Based on Self-Determination Theory for Adolescents Classified as Overweight

ABSTRACT

Purpose: This study examined the feasibility of Project Mentor, a mentoring program based on self-determination theory (SDT) for youth classified as overweight or obese. Methods: In Study 1, youth (N = 23) ranging from 12-18 years of age were randomly assigned to a mentoring intervention or wait-list control condition. Study 2 served as a replication sample and consisted of N = 38 youth who participated in the mentoring program. As part of a process evaluation, attendance and exercise heart rate were monitored to assess whether participants exercised at a moderate-to-vigorous level as intended. Mentees also rated whether mentors created a need-supportive environment. For outcome evaluation, basic need satisfaction, behavioral regulation, fitness, and body composition were assessed at pre, post, and follow-up. Results: Across both studies, participants attended over 80% of the exercise sessions and exercised at a moderate to vigorous intensity level. Mentees also perceived that mentors created a need-supportive environment. Post-test and follow-up basic need scores were higher than baseline values and autonomous motivation increased for mentoring program participants. Effect sizes were generally moderate to large in magnitude based on partial eta-squared and Cohen d. Aerobic fitness (i.e., Vo2peak) showed a moderate to large increase at post-test that was partially maintained at follow-up. Body composition changes were nonsignificant and small in magnitude. Participants in the wait-list control reported showed small changes or decreases across SDT related constructs, fitness, and body composition across both studies. Conclusions: Results across both studies support the feasibility of a mentoring program focused on CARE (competence, autonomy, relatedness, and enjoyment).

KEYWORDS:

• Fitness
• motivation
• obesity
• physical activity intervention

Acknowledgment

A sincere thanks to program coordinators including Julia Andleton, Marissa Carraway, Alesha McNeill, and Layton Reesor for their leadership and to the mentors and mentees who made this project possible.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

Study 1 was supported by an internal grant from ECU IRB: The study received IRB approval prior to participant enrollment.