ABSTRACT
Purpose: Physical activity (PA) has considerable public health benefits. Positive aspects of the interpersonal environment are known to affect PA, yet few studies have investigated whether negative dimensions also influence PA. This study examines the link between changing social network negativity and PA, net of stable confounding characteristics of persons and their environments. Method: Polling respondents in the San Francisco Bay Area over three waves (2015–2018), the UCNets project provides a panel study of social networks and health for two cohorts of adults. Respondents were recruited through stratified random address sampling, and supplemental sampling was conducted through Facebook advertising and referral. With weights, the sample is approximately representative of Californians aged 21–30 and 50–70. Personal social networks were measured using multiple name-generating questions. Fixed effects ordered logistic regression models provide parameter estimates. Results: Younger adults experience significant decreases in PA when network negativity increases, while changes in other network characteristics (e.g. support, size) did not significantly predict changes in PA. No corresponding association was found for older adults. Results are net of baseline covariate levels, stable social and individual differences, and select time-varying characteristics of persons and their environments. Conclusion: Leveraging longitudinal data from two cohorts of adults, this study extends understanding on interpersonal environments and PA by considering the social costs embedded in social networks. This is the first study to investigate how changes in network negativity pattern PA change. Interventions that help young adults resolve or manage interpersonal conflicts may have the benefit of helping to promote healthy lifestyle choices.
Acknowledgments
We thank Blair Wheaton, Scott Schieman, Melissa Milkie, Chris Smith, and Josée Johnston for their comments on an earlier draft of this study.
Disclosure statement
The research presented in this paper is that of the authors and does not reflect the position of the funding sources. The first author is funded in part by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council Joseph-Armand Bombardier Canada Doctoral Graduate Scholarship (grant # 767–2020–1225), and the University of Toronto. The funding sources did not have any role in the study design; collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; writing of the report; or the decision to submit the report for publication.
IRB approval
The UCNets study received IRB approval from the University of California, Berkeley.