221
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Computed Tomography Measurements as a Standard of Exophthalmos? Two-Dimensional Versus Three-Dimensional Techniques

, &
Pages 647-653 | Received 25 Apr 2017, Accepted 14 Jan 2018, Published online: 29 Jan 2018
 

ABSTRACT

Purpose: To compare measurements of exophthalmos using two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) methods.

Methods: The CT data of 50 patients with thyroid eye disease were collected. The exophthalmos measurements were performed using both 2D and 3D methods. The protrusion of the globe center, the deviation angle of the ocular axis, and the distance between the globe center and the corneal apex were also recorded. The agreements between Hertel exophthalmometry and different CT measurements were analyzed, and the geometrical relationship between the protrusion of the corneal apex and globe center were analyzed.

Results: The measurement agreement from consecutive CT scans was significantly better using the 3D method than the 2D method (p < 0.05). The difference in exophthalmos measurements between the 2D and 3D methods was 0.9 ± 1.2 mm (p < 0.05), and the 3D exophthalmos measurement was more consistent with Hertel exophthalmometry. The exophthalmos of the corneal apex and the globe center agreed with the geometrical formula well. The location error between the corneal apexes marked on the 2D and 3D images was correlated with the vertical deviation angle of the ocular axis (r = 0.516).

Conclusion: The reliability of CT measurements performed using a 3D method was better than those obtained using a conventional 2D method. The 3D measurements were also more consistent with the exophthalmometry results. The exophthalmos of the globe center might be considered an important reference for patients with severe strabismus.

Acknowledgments

We appreciate the supports of radiologists, and we appreciate all the colleagues providing help during the study in Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University.

Declaration of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Shanghai Committee of Science and Technology, China [grant number 14411961800], and the Shanghai Health and Family Planning Commission [grant number 20164Y0144].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 555.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.