165
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Cornea

The Effect of Antiamoebic Agents on Viability, Proliferation and Migration of Human Epithelial Cells, Keratocytes and Endothelial Cells, In Vitro

, , ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon &
Pages 725-733 | Received 07 Nov 2017, Accepted 13 Feb 2018, Published online: 12 Mar 2018
 

ABSTRACT

Purpose: To analyze the effect of diamidines (hexamidine-diisethionat (HD), propamidin-isethionate (PD), dibromopropamidine-diisethionat (DD)), and biguanides (polyhexamethylen biguanid (PHMB), chlorhexidine (CH)) on human corneal epithelial cell, keratocyte and endothelial cell viability, proliferation, and migration, in vitro.

Methods: For epithelial and endothelial cells a human cell line and for keratocytes primary cultures were used (n = 6 each). We used 3.9x10−4–0.1% HD, PD or DD, 3.9x10−4–0.0125% PD, 7.8x10−5–0.02% PHMB or CH concentration for 24 h to determine viability (Cell Proliferation Kit XTT), proliferation (Cell Proliferation ELISA BrdU kit), and migration using wound healing assay. Viability/proliferation/migration values of each drug were summarized as “area under curve” (AUC) together with a Mann–Whitney test.

Results: HCEC, keratocyte, and HCEC-12 viability AUC, comparing PD and PHMB (p ≤ 0.014 for all; PD better) or PD and HD (p ≤ 0.011 for all; PD better) differed significantly. Keratocyte and HCEC-12 viability AUC comparing CH and HD (p ≤ 0.027; CH better), HCEC-12 viability AUC comparing PD and HD (p = 0.005; PD better) and HCEC viability AUC comparing CH and PHMB (p = 0.014; CH better) differed significantly. HCEC proliferation AUC, comparing PD with PHMB, CH, DD, HD (p ≤ 0.016; PD worse for all) and keratocyte proliferation AUC, comparing PHMB with HD, PD (p = 0.004; p = 0.002; PHMB better for both), CH with HD, PD (p ≤ 0.001; CH better for both) and DD with PD (p = 0.043; DD better) differed significantly. Keratocyte migration AUC comparing PD with control, PHMB, CH, DD and HD differed significantly (p ≤ 0.012; PD worse for all).

Conclusions: Propamidin-isethionate as diamidine and chlorhexidin as biguanide may be used clinically to reduce cytotoxicity of antiamoebic treatment on human corneal cells. Diamidines reduce proliferation of human epithelial cells and keratocytes more than biguanides and propamidin-isethionate reduces migration of keratocytes. Therefore, in spite of lower cytotoxicity, the inhibitory effect on proliferation and migration indicates that extended use of propamidin-isethionate should be avoided in patients.

Acknowledgments

We thank Prof. Dr. Alan Cayless for improving the use of English in the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Additional information

Funding

No financial interest.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 555.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.