![Sample our Medicine, Dentistry, Nursing & Allied Health journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5944/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Medicine-Dentistry-Nursing-Allied-Health.jpg"})
ABSTRACT
Purpose: To measure the long-term effects of frontalis slings with fascial tissues on the downward eyelid saccadic movements
Methods: Downward lid saccades for 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 degrees of downgaze were measured in a sample of 19 patients with congenital ptosis who underwent frontalis slings with fascia lata (autogenous and banked) and temporalis fascia. Mean postoperative time was 10.7 years ± 3.8 SD. Seventeen age-matched normal subjects comprised the control group. Lid movements as well as the magnitude of brow motion were quantified in all participants with an opto-electronic device that automatically corrected any head movement.
Results: Most patients (77.4%) displayed lagophthalmos on eyelid closure. The lid saccades of the patients were severely restricted and did not increase beyond 30 degrees of downgaze. The maximum velocity of lid saccades was also abnormally low. Although the pre- and postoperative lid positions did not differ between eyes operated with the three types of slings, interocular analysis of patients who had bilateral surgery showed that the restrictive effect on the saccadic movements was more asymmetrical with banked fascia than with autogenous tissue. Overall, there was a significant negative correlation between the surgical effect with frontalis contraction and maximum saccadic amplitude. While in controls brow motion accounted for about 3.3–9.3% of the lid saccades, it was responsible for more than 43.5–57.4% lid movements in the patients.
Conclusion: Fascial slings have a permanent restrictive effect on the elastic properties of the lids. Postoperative lagophthalmos is a natural consequence of any type of fascial sling. Downward saccadic amplitude is negatively correlated with the surgical effect with frontalis contraction.
Declaration of interest
The authors report no conflicts of interest.