123
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Cornea

Five-Year Changes of Anterior Corneal Indices in Diabetics versus Non-Diabetics: The Shahroud Eye Cohort Study

, , , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 30-33 | Received 21 May 2017, Accepted 02 Sep 2018, Published online: 19 Sep 2018
 

ABSTRACT

Purpose: To compare 5-year changes of central and peripheral corneal thickness, corneal volume, and keratometry between diabetic and non-diabetic individuals (>40 years) in a population-based study.

Materials and Methods: Right eye corneal indices of the 333 diabetic persons were compared with 2865 non-diabetics. Studied indices included the apical corneal thickness (ACT), minimal corneal thickness (MCT), thickness values on corneal rings of 4 mm, 6 mm, and 8 mm in diameter, the volume of the 10 mm of the corneal diameter, and the central 3 mm keratometry in two steep (Kmax) and flat (Kmin) axes as measured with Pentacam (Oculus, Inc, Lynnwood, WA).

Results: In the diabetic and non-diabetic groups, respectively, the 5-year change was +0.1 ± 11.9 and −1.2 ± 11.9 μm (p = 0.035) for ACT, −1.1 ± 12.1 and −2.4 ± 11.9 μm (p = 0.056) for MCT, −3.9 ± 12.6 and −5.1 ± 12.3 μm (p = 0.007) for the 4 mm ring, −5.0 ± 15.3 and −7.5 ± 14.5 μm (p = 0.006) for the 6 mm ring, and −7.0 ± 20.1 and −10.8 ± 19.2 μm (p = 0.011) for the 8 mm ring. The diabetic group showed less reduction in corneal volume (−0.5 ± 1.8 mm3) compared to non-diabetics (−0.8 ± 1.6 mm3) (p = 0.030). Kmax (+0.3 ± 0.5D vs. +0.4 ± 0.5, p = 0.028) and Kmin (+0.4 ± 0.5D vs. +0.5 ± 0.5, p = 0.005) showed less change in diabetics compared to non-diabetics.

Conclusions: The overall patterns of change in corneal thickness and shape in over 40-year old diabetics are similar to non-diabetics, such that with aging, reduced thickness and increased keratometry take the cornea towards a prolate shape. However, the age-related changes in central and peripheral corneal thickness, volume and corneal shape are less pronounced in diabetic subjects.

Acknowledgments

The authors have no proprietary interest in any of the materials mentioned in this article.

Disclosure Statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Additional information

Funding

None.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 555.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.