192
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Cornea

Severity Assessment of Acute Hydrops Due to Recurrent Keratoconus after Penetrating Keratoplasty Using Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography

, , , &
Pages 1189-1194 | Received 19 Feb 2019, Accepted 05 Jun 2019, Published online: 13 Jun 2019
 

ABSTRACT

Purpose: To compare the clinical characteristics of acute hydrops between eyes with recurrent keratoconus and eyes with treatment-naïve keratoconus.

Methods: Six eyes with acute hydrops caused by recurrent keratoconus (recurrent group) and 29 eyes with acute hydrops due to treatment-naïve keratoconus (naïve group) were included. We collected data from anterior-segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT), corneal topography and medical records. With AS-OCT, we investigated the location of Descemet’s membrane break, the length and frequency of Descemet’s membrane detachment, and the speed of corneal thinning before acute hydrops.

Results: Descemet’s membrane breaks were detectable in 6 cases in the recurrent group (100%) and 7 cases in the naïve group (70%). Distance from the break to the central line was 2–3 mm in the recurrent group, and less than 1 mm in the naïve group (p < .001). Detachment length was significantly greater in the recurrent group than in the naïve group (p = .003). Steep corneal power values tended to increase before acute hydrops in the recurrent group, but the difference between groups was not significant (observation period; 6.03 ± 2.67, 7.36 ± 5.53 years, respectively). Penetrating keratoplasty was required in 5 cases (83%) in the recurrent group, and 8 cases (28%) in the naïve group (p = .02).

Conclusions: Acute hydrops due to recurrent keratoconus occurred around graft-host junctions and was more severe than that in eyes with treatment-naïve keratoconus. Severity assessment of Descemet’s membrane detachment using AS-OCT provided clues not only for diagnosis, but also for predicting prognosis.

Declaration of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, J.Y., on reasonable request.

Additional information

Funding

This work was financially supported by JSPS KAKENHI (grant number JP18K16917).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 555.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.