249
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Cornea

Lower Tear Meniscus Height Measurements Using Keratography and Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography and Effect of Fluorescein Instillation Methods

ORCID Icon, , &
Pages 1203-1208 | Received 11 Mar 2019, Accepted 04 Jun 2019, Published online: 20 Jun 2019
 

ABSTRACT

Purpose: The first aim of this study was to compare inferior tear meniscus height (TMH) measured by keratography and swept-source optical coherence tomography (OCT). Effect of locations of fluorescein instillation and subjects’ subjective sensation, and the TMH results were also investigated.

Methods: Forty-one eyes from 41 healthy adults had TMH randomly measured by keratography (K5M, Oculus, Germany) and swept-source OCT (Casia SS-1000, Tomey Corp, Japan) at baseline, followed by touching either the inferior bulbar or inferior palpebral conjunctiva, randomly assigned, with a moistened fluorescein strip. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare TMH obtained from the two devices and three measurement conditions. Subjective sensation of conjunctival touch was obtained through a 4-point scale with zero representing no sensation, and one to three representing ocular sensation in an ascending order.

Results: Two-way ANOVA revealed no significant difference in TMH between keratography and swept-source OCT (Factor (devices): F = 0.579, p = .451) while there was a significant difference among fluorescein instillations (Factor (conditions): F = 10.146, p < .001). Baseline TMH was around 0.25 mm, and increased to around 0.28 mm after instillation of fluorescein sodium. Ocular sensation was similar between the two conjunctival touch, and TMH was not significantly associated with ocular sensation.

Conclusions: Keratography and swept-source OCT provided similar TMH results. Applying fluorescein sodium through moistened fluorescein strip could over-estimate TMH by around 0.03 mm. Applying moistened fluorescein strip at bulbar or palpebral conjunctival led to similar subjective sensations and did not affect TMH measurement.

Graphical Abstract

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Dr Tina Lian for her advice on statistical analysis.

Conflict of Interest

None from all authors

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 555.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.