Analysis of Clinical and Regional Distribution Characteristics of Obstructive Meibomian Gland Dysfunction in China: A Multicenter Study

ABSTRACT

Purpose: To analyze the clinical and regional distribution characteristics of obstructive meibomian gland dysfunction (OMGD) in China.

Methods: A total of 2900 patients (2900 eyes) diagnosed with OMGD were enrolled in this multicenter, cross-sectional, observational study. The Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), tear film breakup time (FBUT), Schirmer test (SI), lipid layer thickness (LLT), OMGD grade, meibomian gland loss score (Meiboscore), meibum expressibility score (MES), meibum quality score (MQS), Lid margin abnormality score(LMS) and other tear film stability markers were evaluated.

Results: The prevalence of dry eye in OMGD patients was 89%. There were gender differences among OMGD patients in the 30–39 and 50–59 years age groups (p < .05), and FBUT, Meiboscore, MES and MQS were significantly different among different OMGD grades (p < .05).

There were significant differences in the detection indexes of OMGD patients in the six regions (p < .05), except LLT (p = .329). According to the Qinling-Huaihe River in China, OMGD patients were divided into the North Group (Shenyang and Beijing) and South Group (Wuhan, Changsha, Chongqing, and Chengdu). There was a significant difference in the detection indexes, except LLT (p = .600), between the two groups (p < .05).

FBUT was significantly correlated with the OSDI (r = −0.131; p < .000). Meiboscore and LLT were significantly correlated with the OMGD grade (r = 0.299 and r = 0.106; p < .001). Age, LMS and MQS were significantly correlated with Meiboscore (r = 0.415, r = 0.256 and r = 0.328; p < .001).

Conclusions: The prevalence of dry eye was high among OMGD patients. OMGD patients in different age groups may show different gender distributions. The symptoms of patients showed variation among subgroups with different OMGD grades and among different regions.

KEYWORDS:

• Obstructive meibomian gland dysfunction
• dry eye
• China
• regional distribution
• tear film index

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Science Research Foundation of Aier Eye Hospital Group (No. AM164D05) as well as Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 2017JJ2001).

Disclosure statement

This article has not been published elsewhere and that it has not been submitted simultaneously for publication elsewhere.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Science Research Foundation of Aier Eye Hospital Group [No. AM164D05] as well as Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [No. 2017JJ2001].