328
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Sclera

Surgical and Immunohistochemical Outcomes of Scleral Reconstruction with Autogenic, Allogenic and Xenogenic Grafts: An Experimental Rabbit Model

, MD, PhD, , MSc, , MD, , MSc, , PhD, , MD & , PhD show all
Pages 1572-1582 | Received 13 Oct 2019, Accepted 23 Apr 2020, Published online: 22 May 2020
 

ABSTRACT

Purpose: Choukroun’s platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), a second-generation platelet concentrate, has unique morphological and chemical features and may be considered as a scaffold for scleral reinforcement and regeneration. The purpose of this study was to compare the use of xenogenic human-derived amniotic membrane (HAM), allogenic sclera, and autogenic PRF in rabbit lamellar scleral defect model with respect to both anatomical and immunohistochemical improvement.

Methods: A total of 45 adult New Zealand rabbits were randomized into five groups: normal control; without surgical procedure, negative control; scleral defect model (SDM), xenogenic HAM; SDM+HAM graft, allogenic sclera; SDM+allogenic sclera graft, autogenic PRF; SDM+autogenic PRF graft. Clinical findings, Hematoxylin&Eozin (HE), Masson Trichrome, Verhoeff Acid Fuchsin, Transforming Growth Factor β Receptor 1, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2, collagen type 1, aggrecan, and Matrix Metalloproteinase 2 were evaluated.

Results: Ocular surface inflammation was significantly lower in normal control and autogenic PRF groups (p < .001). Graft was avascular and not integrated to scleral wound area in 25% rabbits of allogenic sclera group (p = .02), was out of the scleral wound in 33.3% rabbits of xenogenic HAM group (p > .05), all the grafts were at the normal location and viable in autogenic PRF group. The inflammation and vascularization in autogenic PRF group was significantly lower than negative control and xenogenic HAM groups in HE (p < .001). The collagen score of negative control and xenogenic HAM groups were significantly lower than normal control (p < .001) and autogenic PRF (p < .001) groups. There were insignificant differences between allogenic sclera and autogenic PRF groups (p > .05). For immunohistochemistry, the closest values to normal control group were detected in autogenic PRF group for all immunomarkers.

Conclusion: Autogenic PRF showed superior features via its excellent anatomical and chemical composition for scleral regeneration when compared to single-layered xenogenic HAM and allogenic sclera grafts.

Disclosure statement

The authors have declared no conflicts of interest for this article.

Author Contributions

G. Dereli Can, Concept/design, Data analysis/interpretation, Drafting article, Critical revision of article, Approval of article, Data collection; G. Akcan, Data collection; M.E. Can, Concept/design, Data analysis/interpretation, Approval of article; Ö.E. Akdere, Data collection; S. Çaylı, Data collection, Data analysis/interpretation, Drafting article; G. Şimşek, Approval of article; M. Gümüşderelioğlu, Data analysis/interpretation, Drafting article.

Supplementary material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed here.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey [Grant No. 216S384] [216S384].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 555.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.