ABSTRACT
Purpose
To compare the outcomes of canaliculotomy and curettage with and without silicone tube intubation in the treatment of primary canaliculitis.
Methods
A prospective, randomized, interventional case series was performed. Fifty patients diagnosed with unilateral inferior primary canaliculitis underwent canaliculotomy with curettage and were randomly divided into two groups depending on silicone tube intubation. Twenty-five patients were recruited in group A (without intubation) and 25 patients were recruited in group B (with intubation). The resolution of infection, the success rate and postoperative complications observed in both groups were analyzed with a minimum follow-up of 1 year.
Results
Forty-seven patients were finally included in the study consisting of 23 patients in group A and 24 patients in group B. There were 33 females and 14 males with a median age of 57 ± 13.9 years (range 29–89 years). All patients recorded complete resolution of canaliculitis and no recurrent infections were observed in the 2 groups during follow-up. A significantly higher number of anatomical and functional successes were achieved in patients in group B (100%, 87.5%) than in group A (78.3%, 60.9%) (P < .05,). The surgical complication of canalicular obstruction was significantly higher in patients in group A (21.7%, 5/23) compared to group B (0/24)(P < .05).
Conclusion
Canaliculotomy with curettage gives excellent clinical outcomes in the treatment of patients with primary canaliculitis and a higher success rate can be achieved when silicone tube intubation is performed during the procedure. The use of silicone tube intubation may be a necessary choice in canaliculotomy to avoid post-operative canalicular obstruction.