1,466
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Using Manual Ungual Morphology to Predict Substrate Use in the Drepanosauromorpha and the Description of a New Species

ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &
Article: e1810058 | Received 05 Feb 2020, Accepted 03 Jul 2020, Published online: 08 Oct 2020
 

ABSTRACT

Fossils of drepanosauromorphs, a clade of non-saurian diapsids, were once considered relatively rare in the Chinle Formation of the southwestern United States as well as in Upper Triassic rocks globally. Recent discoveries have shown that there are at least four drepanosauromorph taxa present in the Chinle Formation including Dolabrosaurus aquatilis, Drepanosaurus sp., Ancistronychus paradoxus, and a new genus and species described here, Skybalonyx skapter. This new taxon is represented by disarticulated manual unguals and is preserved in a microvertebrate bearing bone-bed in the Blue Mesa Member (∼223–220 Ma) of the Chinle Formation at Petrified Forest National Park, which was deposited in a fluvio-lacustrine setting in equatorial Pangaea during the mid-Norian. Different types of substrate use have been hypothesized for the Drepanosauromorpha. By performing discriminant function analyses using the manual unguals of 173 mammal and 13 reptile species with known substrate use, we hope to infer the ecomorphology of drepanosauromorphs. We found that the enlarged second manual unguals of Drepanosaurus sp. are similar to hook-and-pull digging taxa (e.g., Tamandua mexicana and Cyclopes didactylus) although the smaller manual unguals referred to this taxon (likely pertaining to digits other than digit II) are similar to modern arboreal taxa. Our results support the inference of arboreality in some drepanosauromorph species. However, we found that the manual unguals of Ancistronychus paradoxus and Skybalonyx skapter fit within the range of variation of modern fossorial and subterranean taxa, which expands the functional diversity of the Drepanosauromorpha within the Chinle Formation.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank B. Parker, W. Reyes, E. Patellos, B. Gee, B. Small, A. R. C. Milner, and the Virginia Tech Paleo crew for their assistance collecting the specimens in the field. M. Smith, C. Lash, N. Dzenowski, and M. Rubin facilitated access and use of the PEFO laboratory and collections. We thank C. Marean, D. Lunde, and M. Omura for facilitating access at ASU, NMNH, and MCZ. The Petrified Forest Museum Association and PEFO provided funding for field and lab work. Thanks to B. Creisler for help with the genus and species binomen. We thank A. Fitch, R. Gay and I. Smail for insights regarding our ecological assignments, as well as coding. S. Werning, A. Farke, Y. Wong, N. Vitek, and J. Infante created the silhouettes on phylopic.com. We thank S. Renesto and an anonymous reviewer for helpful reviews of the paper. This is PEFO contribution number 73. The conclusions presented here are those of the authors and do not represent the views of the United States Government.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

Article Purchase UJVP USD 15.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 194.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.