970
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

How many sabertooths? Reevaluating the number of carnivoran sabretooth lineages with total-evidence Bayesian techniques and a novel origin of the Miocene Nimravidae

, ORCID Icon &
Article: e1923523 | Received 22 May 2020, Accepted 07 Feb 2021, Published online: 08 Jun 2021
 

ABSTRACT

Sabertooth craniodental adaptations have evolved numerous times amongst carnivorous mammals. Some of the most extreme sabertooth adaptations are found within the carnivoran subfamily Barbourofelinae. However, the evolutionary origins of this group have been uncertain for more than 170 years, with variable placement as an independent case of sabertooth acquisition, as a clade within the Nimravidae (Eocene to Oligocene ‘false sabertooth cats’), or as a member of the Machairodontinae (true sabertooth cats such as Smilodon). Here we present a novel approach to assessing the validity of three independent sabertooth clades within Carnivora. We performed a total-evidence Bayesian analysis in Beast2 across all major carnivoran families, using the fossilized birth-death (FBD) model and incorporating 223 morphological characters, nuclear and mitochondrial gene sequences, and stratigraphic occurrence data. Our results place barbourofelines as terminal members of the Nimravidae, sister to the Nimravini (0.91 posterior probability), a relationship not found in prior cladistic studies. Ancestral area estimation performed in the R package BioGeoBEARS best supports a primarily European paleobiogeographic center for the barbourofelines with multiple dispersal events to other continents, a finding in direct opposition to past hypotheses for this group. Furthermore, new patterns in convergence between nimravids and machairodontines were revealed via Bayesian ancestral state estimation in BayesTraits. Results support a hypothesis of cats copying nimravids, and nimravids cats in certain aspects of sabertooth morphology, and not total evolutionary independence of these features as typically envisioned.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We would like to thank the people and institutions that provided access to specimens used in this study, including: E. White, and E. B. Davis of the University of Oregon Museum of Natural and Cultural History; N. Famoso, John Day Fossil Beds National Monument; J. Galkin, American Museum of Natural History; A. Farrell and G. Takeuchi of the Los Angeles County Museum, George C. Page Museum; and P. Holroyd of the University of California Museum of Paleontology, Berkeley. Furthermore, we would like to thank M. Morlo, an anonymous reviewer and M. Borths whose extremely insightful and useful comments guided this project to its current state. Finally, this work was supported by NSF grant DEB-1256897, and used the Extreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment (XSEDE), which is supported by NSF grant number ACI-1548562

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

Article Purchase UJVP USD 15.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 194.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.