Article title: Rheological characteristics of bauxite slurry with varying concentration, particle size distribution, and modal distribution for pipeline transportation
Authors: Nosum Reddy & Jayanta Kumar Pothal
Journal: Particulate Science and Technology
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02726351.2024.2320102
When this article was first published online, the y-axis of Figures 4(b), 5(b), 6(b), 7(b), 8(b), and 9(b) had the unit of measurement of dynamic viscosity mentioned as “(mPa)” incorrectly.
Figure 4. (a) Effect of concentration (45–65 wt%) on the rheogram of sample A bauxite slurry. (b) Effect on viscosity for changing concentrations (45–65 wt%) of sample A bauxite slurry.
Figure 5. (a) Effect of particle size distribution on shear stress for slurry samples A–E at Cw = 55%. (b) Apparent viscosity changes with particle size distribution of bauxite slurry samples A–E at Cw = 55%.
Figure 6. (a) Effect of bimodal distribution (sample A+E) on shear stress for varying coarse fraction E (0–30 wt%) at total Cw = 60%. (b) Effect on viscosity for bimodal distribution (sample A+E) with varying coarse fraction E (0–30 wt%) at total Cw = 60%.
Figure 7. (a). Effect of trimodal distribution (sample A+E+D) on shear stress for varying coarse fraction D (0–30 wt%) at total Cw = 60%. (b) Effect on viscosity for trimodal distribution (sample A+E+D) with varying coarse fraction D (0–30 wt%) at total Cw = 60%.
Figure 8. (a) Effect of multimodal distribution (sample A+E+D+C) on shear stress for varying coarse fraction C (0–15 wt%) at total Cw = 60%. (b) Effect on viscosity for multimodal distribution (sample A+E+D+C) with varying coarse fraction C (0–15 wt%) at total Cw = 60%.
Figure 9. (a). Rheogram (τ vs. γ˙) of multimodal bauxite slurry (sample A+E+D+C+B) at Cw = 60%. (b) Apparent viscosity (ɳ) vs. shear rate (γ˙) of multimodal bauxite slurry (sample A+E+D+C+B) at Cw = 60%.
This has been corrected as “(mPa.s)” and the updated figures have been republished online as below.