578
Views
28
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ARTICLE

Should I Stay or Should I Go? The Influence of Genetic Origin on Emigration Behavior and Physiology of Resident and Anadromous Juvenile Oncorhynchus mykiss

, , , , &
Pages 772-780 | Received 04 Sep 2011, Accepted 12 Apr 2012, Published online: 27 Jul 2012
 

Abstract

We investigated the interaction among genetically identified origin, behavioral tendency to emigrate, and Na+, K+-ATPase enzyme activity in recently diverged subpopulations of resident (above-barrier) rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss and steelhead (anadromous rainbow trout) in Scott Creek, California. Genetic assignment tests found that the frequency of resident and anadromous origin fish varied by sampling location within the watershed. Individuals immediately below barriers assigned to both above-barrier (37%) and anadromous (63%) subpopulations, and distinct differences in size and age were observed. However, the majority of downstream migration behavior occurred in fish of anadromous ancestry, which represented 97% of the fish sampled as outmigrating smolts. Nonmigratory fish of both life history types and origins typically had low Na+, K+-ATPase activity levels throughout most of the year, but significantly elevated levels were observed in individuals from both groups during the spring smolt migration period. Conversely, many fish sampled in the upper watershed with anadromous genotypes were greater than typical smolt size thresholds for this population yet appeared unlikely to migrate based on low Na+, K+-ATPase activity. Life history pathways of O. mykiss in this population are strongly influenced but not entirely determined by origin in the resident or anadromous subpopulation, and this relationship has implications for recovery of populations impacted by dams, water diversions, and residualized hatchery fish. Further, this work demonstrates the need to consider resident rainbow trout as potentially important resources for recovery of threatened and endangered steelhead populations.

Received September 4, 2011; accepted April 12, 2012

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Funding for this study was provided by the National Marine Fisheries Service, the California Central Coast Salmon Restoration Program, and the California Fisheries Restoration Grant Program. Field assistance was provided by A. Ammann, M. Atcheson, M. Beakes, S. Campbell, A. Collins, M. Durighello, D. Frechette, L. Schilpp, D. Gottesman, E. Freund, J. Harding, K. Hauser, T. Hollenbeck, D. Kaufman, J. Krupa, J. Perez, C. Phillis, C. Michel, A. Osterback, I. Ralston, D. Schperberg, S. Sogard, D. Swank, E. Sturm, R. Weidling, and J. Wong. We thank J. Anderson, G. Charrier, E. Gilbert-Horvath, A. Martínez, H. Starks, and E. Wood-Charlson for assisting with laboratory analysis of DNA samples. Landowner access was provided by Big Creek Lumber Company, the Rowley family, the Wilson family, Lockheed Martin Corporation and Cal Poly's Swanton Pacific Ranch. Animal studies were approved by the University of California Santa Cruz Animal Use Committee and carried out according to National Institutes of Health guidelines and National Marine Fisheries Service Endangered Species Act Section 10 permit 1112.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

There are no offers available at the current time.

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.