Abstract
Tag retention, tag reporting rate, misreading of tags, and other issues are common concerns with traditional tagging methods when marking fish for various stock assessments. These concerns have prompted the development and evaluation of alternative marking techniques by fisheries scientists. Wildlife scientists have overcome these obstacles by using genetic samples in lieu of tagging when studying rare, elusive, and capture-sensitive species. Recent technological advances facilitate similar alternatives for fisheries stock assessment. Muskellunge Esox masquinongy populations exist at low density and are difficult to sample; the Muskellunge is therefore an appropriate species to use in assessing this tool. We used microsatellite DNA analysis of samples from two connected lakes in north-central Minnesota to estimate adult population size using mark–recapture techniques. In total, 178 unique fish were identified during a trap-net marking period; 59 individuals were identified within an electrofishing resampling period, and 28 of those were recaptures, recognized by their matching genotypes. Based on these data, we obtained a population estimate of 369 adults (95% confidence interval = 269–470). The results of this study demonstrate the utility of genetic markers in place of traditional tagging methods for fish.
Received September 24, 2014; accepted December 1, 2014
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank the MNDNR staff from the Walker, Park Rapids, and Brainerd Area offices for assistance with trap-netting and electrofishing. Residents of Baby and Man lakes, local anglers, and members of four regional chapters of Muskies, Inc., also assisted with trap-netting. This study was funded in part by the Federal Aid in Sport Fish Restoration (Dingell–Johnson) Program (Project F29-R, Minnesota). We thank Neal Wehrwein and Sofi Lopez for assistance in the laboratory, and we are grateful to Andrew Carlson, Steve Mero, and Patrick Schmalz for providing edits to this paper.