542
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ARTICLE

Estimating Regional Fishing Mortality for Freshwater Systems: a Florida Largemouth Bass Example

, , &
Pages 681-689 | Received 20 Nov 2014, Accepted 31 Mar 2015, Published online: 09 Jul 2015
 

Abstract

Species-specific harvest regulations in recreational fisheries are commonly applied regionally to protect stocks from overharvest and satisfy a diverse set of anglers. While setting regulations is a complex task and may incorporate the best available social and biological information, fisheries managers commonly obtain directed fishing mortality estimates within a single lake and then assume similar rates among other systems when setting regional harvest regulations. Thus, there is a need to assess regional levels of fishing mortality for informed use of regionally applied regulations. We implemented a practical method for assessing catch and harvest for a recreational fishery across a broad spatial region. We used a passive tag-reward study design and a regional management regulation area for Florida Largemouth Bass Micropterus salmoides floridanus in central Florida as our case study. The estimated fishing mortality rate included both harvest and deaths due to catch and release. We found overall regional fishing mortality for Florida Largemouth Bass in central Florida was relatively low. From the 247 dart tags returned, the mean annual instantaneous total fishing mortality rate was 0.11 (95% credible interval = 0.08–0.15). We also found fishing mortality rates did not vary with lake size or fish total length. Our study design did not provide mortality estimates for any specific lake due to a low number of tagged fish per lake, but the method could be used to elucidate the effectiveness of regulations that are applied at a regional scale.

Received November 20, 2014; accepted March 31, 2015

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Wes Porak and Jim Estes for help in the initial conception of this study. We also thank members of the Allen Lab, FWC Tag Return Hotline, and the numerous FWC biologists for help with data collection and processing. This study was funded by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission using U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Sport Fish Restoration Program funds. The Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit is jointly supported by North Carolina State University, North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission, U.S. Geological Survey, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and Wildlife Management Institute. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

There are no offers available at the current time.

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.