205
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ARTICLE

Influence of Movement Dynamics on Walleye Harvest Management in Intermixed Fisheries in a Chain of Lakes

, , &
Pages 467-479 | Received 30 Jul 2016, Accepted 06 Jan 2017, Published online: 31 Mar 2017
 

Abstract

Fish populations that exhibit movement patterns present challenges to fishery management. In the Inland Waterway in Michigan’s northern Lower Peninsula, monitoring Walleye Sander vitreus population dynamics and harvest management is difficult because of seasonal intermixing among interconnected lakes. In addition, the presence of tribal subsistence fishing and recreational angling fisheries that occur during different discrete time periods adds complexity to understanding harvest management performance. We used stochastic simulation to determine the influence of movement and harvest dynamics on the performance of harvest management targets for Walleye in our study system. After accounting for postspawn movement and harvest dynamics, our results indicated that population-specific exploitation rates on average did not exceed the target rates (u = 0.35) that are mandated in the waterway. We did, however, determine that some areas are at risk because they experienced population-specific exploitation rates that surpassed the target. We also determined that the interplay between movement and uncertain population and harvest dynamics will likely determine the ability of management to meet currently accepted harvest targets on average over time, as well as the risk of exceeding harvest targets each year. Our findings are broadly applicable for mobile species inhabiting lake chains and highlight that it is critical for managers to gain an understanding of movement as well as harvest dynamics, because both are imperative for understanding how these dynamics influence harvest management performance. As such, we recommend that managers of Walleye populations in other waterways implement tagging studies and harvest monitoring programs to gain an understanding of movement rates and harvest dynamics. An understanding of movement and harvest dynamics along with the stochastic simulation framework we used provides a better understanding of complex system dynamics and leads to informed harvest management decisions.

Received July 30, 2016; accepted January 6, 2017 Published online March 31, 2017

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MNDR) Fisheries Division, Little Traverse Bay Band of Odawa Indians fisheries staff, and Michigan State University field technicians for providing assistance with the field work to collect the data that was used to inform our simulation model. Special thanks are also extended to Brian Roth, Gary Mittelbach, and Mary Bremigan for providing insightful reviews on early drafts of this work. Thanks to Danielle Forsyth Kilijanczyk (MDNR Institute for Fisheries Research) for generating the map for the manuscript. We also acknowledge the useful comments by anonymous reviewers. Funding for this project was provided by Federal Aid to Sport Fish Restoration, State of Michigan Game and Fish Fund, and the Robert C. Ball and Betty A. Ball Michigan State University Fisheries and Wildlife Fellowship. This paper is contribution 2017-05 of the Quantitative Fisheries Center at Michigan State University.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

There are no offers available at the current time.

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.