385
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Epidemiology

Asthma prevalence among women aged 18 to 44 in the United States: National health and nutrition examination survey 2001–2016

, MPH, , PhD, , PhD, MPH, , MD, MS & , ScD
Pages 693-702 | Received 18 Oct 2018, Accepted 31 Mar 2019, Published online: 24 Apr 2019
 

Abstract

Objective: To provide updated prevalence estimates of asthma and asthma medication use for women of childbearing age in the United States.

Methods: Using data from 11,383 women aged 18–44, including a subset of 1,245 pregnant women, enrolled in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2001–2016), we assessed the age-adjusted prevalence of self-reported diagnosed asthma. For women aged 18–44, we stratified by year, demographics, and other characteristics. Furthermore, we assessed asthma medication use among women aged 18–44 with asthma.

Results: After age-adjustment, 9.9% (95% confidence interval (CI) 9.2%, 10.7%) of women aged 18–44 and 10.9% (95% CI 7.2%, 14.6%) of pregnant women reported having asthma. Asthma prevalence was highest in 2015–2016 (12.0% 95% CI 9.8%, 14.3%) and lowest in 2003–2004 (8.6% 95% CI 6.4%, 10.8%). Women aged 18–44 with Medicaid or State Children’s Health Insurance Program insurance coverage (16.8% 95% CI 14.5%, 19.2%), obesity (14.4% 95% CI 12.9%, 15.8%), diabetes (18.7% 95% CI 12.1%, 25.2%), hypertension (16.6% 95% CI 14.2%, 19.0%), and current smokers (12.8% 95% CI 11.4%, 14.2%) had the highest asthma prevalence. Of women with asthma, 38.3% (95% CI 34.5%, 42.1%) reported using asthma medications in the past 30 days.

Conclusions: Among women of childbearing ages, asthma burden varies across demographic and clinical characteristics and has increased in recent years.

Study conception and design: Flores, Bandoli, Chambers, Schatz and Palmsten. Acquisition of data: Flores. Analysis of data: Flores, Bandoli and Palmsten. Interpretation of results: Flores, Bandoli, Chambers, Schatz and Palmsten. Critical revision of the manuscript: Flores, Bandoli, Chambers, Schatz and Palmsten. All authors have approved the final version of the manuscript.

Additional information

Funding

K Palmsten is supported by a career development award from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development, National Institutes of Health [R00HD082412]. G Bandoli is supported by the National Institutes of Health, Clinical and Translational Science Awards [TL1TR001443].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 1,078.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.