259
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Education

Using community priorities and misconceptions about asthma as a vessel for community-led education among Hispanics

, MSCHORCID Icon, , MDORCID Icon, , MHAORCID Icon, , BAORCID Icon, , MDORCID Icon, , MDORCID Icon, , PhDORCID Icon & , MD, MPHORCID Icon show all
Pages 405-412 | Received 08 Jul 2019, Accepted 07 Nov 2019, Published online: 21 Nov 2019
 

Abstract

Objectives

In New York City, asthma prevalence is greater in Hispanics than non-Hispanics for both children (10.9% vs. 7.4%) and adults (9.0% vs. 6.3%). Disparities in asthma management among Hispanics are found to arise, in part, from a limited education about asthma. Using elements of Community Based Participatory Research (CBPR), we worked with the community to identify asthma priorities and misconceptions among Hispanics and used that information to develop a tailored asthma educational tool—the Asthma Training Modules (ATMs).

Methods

Over the past 3 years (2016, 2017, and 2018), we conducted educational asthma workshops to collect and analyze information to develop the ATMs and a summary of the ATMs in an Asthma Educational Card (AEC). We trained 6 Asthma-Community-Leaders using the ATMs, who assembled community members for teaching sessions using the AEC. Participants completed a pre-and-post asthma knowledge questionnaire.

Results

We identified asthma priorities and misconceptions themed on: culturally relevant resources for Hispanics, symptom and trigger recognition, and treatments. A total of 104 participants attended the teaching sessions led by Asthma-Community-Leaders and participants’ mean knowledge score increased from 64% pre-teaching to 85% post-teaching, (p < 0.01).

Conclusion

Our community-led education, which included a tailored asthma educational tool and trained Asthma-Community-Leaders, successfully improved asthma knowledge among Hispanics. Further studies are warranted to determine whether these results are reproducible among a larger cohort and what the comparative effectiveness of our intervention as compared to other education-based interventions.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the contribution of community stakeholders and collaborators including Miguel Molineros, Clara Londoño, Reyzury Jackson, Juan C. Gomez, Carmen Melendez, and Angel Munoz.

Declaration of interest

All authors have no financial conflicts of interest to disclose.

Correction Statement

This article has been republished with minor changes. These changes do not impact the academic content of the article.

Additional information

Funding

Financial support for this study was provided by The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) Pipeline to Proposal Project and 5095049–015 Jacome (PI), and the CHEST Foundation Community Service Grant, Hajizadeh (PI). The statements presented in this article are solely the responsibility of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute® (PCORI®), its Board of Governors or Methodology Committee.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 1,078.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.