13
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Montelukast treatment response according to eosinophil-derived neurotoxin level in children with allergic rhinitis

, MD, , BSc, , PhD & , MD
Received 15 Jan 2024, Accepted 16 Jun 2024, Accepted author version posted online: 17 Jun 2024
 
Accepted author version

Abstract

Eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN) is an important biomarker of eosinophilic inflammation. This study evaluated Montelukast treatment response according to EDN concentration in children with perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR). Fifty-two children with PAR were recruited and took a combination of Montelukast (5mg) and Levocetirizine (5mg) “Mont/Levo Group” or only Montelukast (5mg) “Mont Group” for 4 weeks. All caregivers were instructed to record rhinitis symptoms for 4 weeks. EDN was measured before and after treatment. Daytime nasal symptom scores (DNSS) significantly decreased in both the Mont/Levo (P = 0.0001; n = 20) and Mont Group (P < 0.0001; n = 20), but there were no significant differences between the two groups. EDN concentration also significantly decreased after treatment in both groups (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.001, respectively). For secondary analysis, children with a high initial EDN concentration (EDN ≥ 53 ng/mL) were placed in the “High EDN Group”, while those with a lower initial EDN concentration (EDN < 53 ng/mL) were put in the “Low EDN Group”. Both groups experienced significant reductions in DNSS after either treatment regimen (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.0027, respectively) but the High EDN Group had greater reductions. EDN concentrations in the High EDN Group decreased significantly from either treatment (P < 0.0001). We found that children with AR and a high serum EDN concentration may respond well to Montelukast treatment. A therapeutic strategy using EDN concentrations in patients with AR to evaluate therapeutic response may help improve quality of care.

Disclaimer

As a service to authors and researchers we are providing this version of an accepted manuscript (AM). Copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proofs will be undertaken on this manuscript before final publication of the Version of Record (VoR). During production and pre-press, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal relate to these versions also.

Funding

The author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 1,078.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.