A comparative study of microbial communities in soils amended by manures from pigs fed with organic versus synthetic feeds

Abstract

We applied pyrosequencing to determine bacterial communities in soil samples taken from test fields amended by manures of pigs fed with green feeds (GPMS), synthetic feeds (APMS), and the reference field without swine manure amendment (NPMS), respectively. For each sample, 7050 effective sequences were selected and utilized to do the bacterial diversity and abundance analysis, respectively. In total, 2986, 2873, and 1602 operational taxonomic units were obtained at a 3% distance cut-off in GPMS, APMS, and NPMS, respectively. Bacterial phylotype richness in GPMS was higher than the other samples. NPMS had the least richness. The most dominant class in both GPMS and APMS is Betaproteobacteria, whereas Alphaproteobacteria is dominant in NPMS. Circa 7.5% sequences in GPMS were found to be affiliated with Burkholderiales order. Bacterial diversity and abundance in the soil varied with swine manure amendment, due to nutrient elements as well as toxic metals in swine manures. Compared with the soil amendment by manures from pigs bred with synthetic feeds, more bacterial diversity but less potentially pathogenic bacterial genera in the soil amended by manures of pigs fed with green feeds were found, which indicated that these manures were better land-applied organic fertilizers.

Keywords:

• pyrosequencing
• soil bacterial community
• swine manure
• pig feed

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Science and Technology Innovation Project of Wenzhou City (No. C2012005-03), the Foundation of Zhejiang Educational Committee (No. Y201224611), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2013M541647), and the Jiangsu Planned Projects for Postdoctoral Research Funds (No. 1302130C).

Supplemental data

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed here.