214
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Eco/Toxicology

Fibrogenic effects of crocidolite, amosite, and chrysotile asbestos fibers on lung fibroblasts

, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 148-164 | Received 15 Dec 2018, Accepted 24 May 2019, Published online: 13 Jun 2019
 

Abstract

Asbestos causes fibrotic lung diseases such as asbestosis and lung scarring, but the molecular mechanisms underlying the effects of specific types of asbestos fibers are not fully understood. The objective of this study was to investigate the fibrogenic activity of commonly used asbestos types crocidolite (serpentine) and amosite and chrysotile (amphiboles) which differ in general toxicity. IMR-90 lung fibroblasts were exposed to various concentrations of crocidolite, amosite, and chrysotile and analyzed for viability, adhesion, cell damage, functional activity, and expression of genes associated with fibrosis, cell stress, and toxicity responses. Exposure of fibroblasts to the three asbestos fibers for 48 h did not affect cellular functions such as filamentous actin distribution and mitochondrial activity. PCR microarray profiling of the expression of 84 genes central to fibrogenesis revealed that chrysotile significantly upregulated the transcription of genes encoding pro-fibrotic cytokines and downregulated genes related to the transforming growth factor-beta superfamily, whereas the effects of crocidolite and amosite on pro-fibrotic gene expression were much weaker. There was no significant difference in the expression of oxidative stress- and toxic response-related genes among the three asbestos types. These results provide new evidence that chrysotile has a stronger pro-fibrotic potential than amosite and crocidolite.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Jeffrey D. Rimer for his helpful comments on this work.

Data availability statement

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplementary materials.

Geolocation information

South Korea

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest is reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Korea government (MSIT) under Grant number [2017R1E1A1A01078335], the Catholic Medical Center Research Foundation (program year 2019), and the Institute of Clinical Medicine Research, Yeouido St. Mary’s Hospital.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 2,970.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.