ABSTRACT
In this essay, we describe how rhetoric’s theories of temporality can inform ongoing urban development. We examine a transportation planning case to suggest that urban development must value contributions from people, places, and ecologies with their own unique rhythms. We coin the term coeval rhetorical temporalities to describe the multiple and sometimes conflicting scales of time that nonhuman and human participants bring to transportation planning. To demonstrate our notion of coeval rhetorical temporalities and the consequences of disregarding them, we highlight how human notions of progress are being used to legitimize road development that is neither efficient, ethical, nor resilient.
Notes
1 Infrastructural theorist CitationPaul Edwards argues that sociotechnical “infrastructures fail precisely because their developers approach nature as orderly, dependable, and separable from society and technology” (195).
Edwards, Paul N. “Infrastructure and Modernity: Force, Time, and Social Organization.” Modernity and Technology, edited by Thomas J. Misa, et al., The MIT P, 2003, pp. 185–226. Ballif, Michelle. “Re/Dressing Histories: Or, on Re/Covering Figures Who Have Been Laid Bare by Our Gaze.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly, vol. 22, no. 1, 1992, pp. 91–98. doi:10.1080/02773949209390943. ———. Theorizing Histories of Rhetoric. Southern Illinois UP, 2013. Galliet, Lynee Lewis. The Present State of Scholarship in the History of Rhetoric: A Twenty-First Century Guide. U of Missouri P, 2010. Glenn, Cheryl. Rhetoric Retold: Regendering the Tradition from Antiquity through the Renaissance. Southern Illinois UP, 1997. Jarratt, Susan. Rereading the Sophists: Classical Rhetoric Refigured. Southern Illinois UP, 1998. Mao, LuMing. “Writing the Other into Histories of Rhetorics: Theorizing the Art of Recontextualization.” Theorizing Histories of Rhetoric, edited by Michelle Ballif, Southern Illinois UP, 2013, pp. 41–57. Vivian, Bradford. “Memory: Ars Memoriae, Collective Memory, and the Fortunes of Rhetoric.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly, vol. 48, no. 3, 2018, pp. 287–96. doi:10.1080/02773945.2018.1454214. Stahl, Roger. “A Clockwork War: Rhetorics of Time in A Time of Terror.” Quarterly Journal of Speech, vol. 94, no. 1, 2008, pp. 73–99. doi:10.1080/00335630701790826. Aronson, Anne. “Composing in a Material World: Women Writing in Space and Time.” Rhetoric Review, vol. 17, no. 2, 1999, pp. 282–99. doi:10.1080/07350199909359246. Carey, Tamika L. “Necessary Adjustments: Black Women’s Rhetorical Impatience.” Rhetoric Review, vol. 39, no. 3, 2020, pp. 269–86. doi:10.1080/07350198.2020.1764745. Hatfield, Joe Edward. “The Queer Kairotic: Digital Transgender Suicide Memories and Ecological Rhetorical Agency.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly, vol. 49, no. 1, 2019, pp. 25–48. doi:10.1080/02773945.2018.1549334. Jack, Jordynn. “Space, Time, Memory: Gendered Recollections of Wartime Los Alamos.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly, vol. 37, no. 3, 2007, pp. 229–50. doi:10.1080/02773940601039363. Mutnick, Deborah. “Time and Space in Composition Studies: ‘Through the Gates of the Chronotope.’.” Rhetoric Review, vol. 25, no. 1, 2006, pp. 41–57. doi:10.1207/s15327981rr2501_3.