467
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Effects of mixing state on water-uptake properties of ammonium sulfate – Organic mixtures

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 1009-1021 | Received 28 Mar 2022, Accepted 28 Jul 2022, Published online: 07 Sep 2022

Abstract

Aerosol particles in the atmosphere have the ability to uptake water and form droplets. The droplets formed can interact with solar radiation (indirect effect of aerosols) and influence the net radiative forcing. However, the magnitude of change in radiative forcing due to the indirect effect of aerosols remains uncertain due to the high variance in aerosol composition and mixing states, both spatial and temporally. As such, there is a need to measure the water-uptake of different aerosol particle groups under controlled conditions to gain insight into the water-uptake of complex ambient systems. In this work, the water-uptake (hygroscopicity) of internally and externally mixed ammonium sulfate – organic binary mixtures were directly measured via three methods and compared to droplet growth prediction models. We found that subsaturated water-uptake of ammonium sulfate-organic mixtures agreed with their supersaturated hygroscopicities, and mixing state information was able to be retrieved at both humidity regimes. In addition, we found that solubility-adjusted models may not be able to capture the water-uptake of viscous particles, and for soluble organic aerosol particles, bulk solubility may not be comparable to their solubility in a droplet. This work highlights the importance of using multiple complementary water-uptake measurement instruments to get a clearer picture of mixed aerosol particle hygroscopicity, especially for increasingly complex systems.

Copyright © 2022 American Association for Aerosol Research

Graphical Abstract

SYNOPSIS STATEMENT

This work provides water-uptake measurements of mixed aerosol particles that are prevalent in the atmosphere that can be useful in improving climate models.

Introduction

Aerosol particles in the atmosphere can indirectly affect the radiative budgets through droplet and cloud formation (Haywood and Boucher Citation2000). Clouds and droplets can reflect or absorb solar radiation, leading to a cooling or warming effect on the atmosphere and Earth’s surface (Lohmann and Feichter Citation2005). Changes in aerosol particles’ water-uptake properties (hygroscopicity) have significant effects on air quality, climate, and visibility as it can lead to changes in their optical properties and can also modify their contribution toward the net radiative forcing (Lohmann and Feichter Citation2005). Additionally, the indirect effect of aerosols is the largest source of uncertainty in climate and radiative forcing modeling, partly due to the wide variety of composition of atmospheric aerosols that can evolve spatially and temporally (IPCC Citation2021).

Inorganic and organic particles are found in the atmosphere and can form clouds and droplets. The water-uptake properties of inorganic particles have been well characterized, and the water-uptake properties of organic aerosols have been extensively studied (Dawson et al. Citation2020; Altaf et al. Citation2018; Zhang et al. Citation2016; Lei et al. Citation2014; Jimenez et al. 2009; Prenni et al. Citation2001, Citation2007; Kanakidou et al. Citation2005; VanReken et al. Citation2005; Raymond and Pandis Citation2003; Cruz and Pandis Citation1998). However, ambient aerosols often exist as a mixture of organic and inorganic particles, and models have shown that the presence of organic particles in mixed aerosols can significantly affect particle growth and water-uptake (Nandy et al. Citation2021); and as such, research into the water-uptake of mixed aerosol particles under controlled conditions is important to further our understanding of the water-uptake of atmospheric aerosol particles.

The mixing states of aerosol particles can be classified into externally or internally mixed. An external mixture occurs when different aerosol species can be assumed to be physically separated from each other. For example, for binary external mixtures, two distinct populations would be observed. Internally mixed (homogenous or phase separated) aerosols consist of particles with the same mixture of chemical species (Riemer et al. Citation2019; Altaf et al. Citation2018). Changes in the water-uptake of mixed particles, at both sub- and supersaturated conditions, have been the focal point of several studies. Cruz and Pandis (Citation2000) reported that an increase in organic fraction reduced the growth factor (Gf) of mixed particles (Cruz and Pandis Citation2000). Additionally, Brooks et al. (Citation2002) found that the presence of water-soluble dicarboxylic acids can lower the deliquescence relative humidity (DRH) of ammonium sulfate, and that less-soluble dicarboxylic acids did not affect the DRH of the inorganic (Brooks et al. Citation2002). Furthermore, Bilde and Svenningsson (Citation2004) suggested that small amounts of salt can significantly affect the water-uptake of mixed particles (Bilde and Svenningsson Citation2004). Lei et al. also demonstrated that the presence of a hygroscopic organic such as levoglucosan decreased the apparent DRH of ammonium sulfate, whereas the presence of a non-hygroscopic organic compound such as 4-Hydroxybenzoic acid reduced the water-uptake of mixed particles. The results of Lei et al. suggest that the presence of hygroscopic organic particles may be the primary reason that causes an enhancement in water-uptake of mixed particles compared to pure inorganics when RH < DRH (Lei et al. Citation2014).

Supersaturated water-uptake of mixed (ammonium sulfate and organic acids) particles has been investigated by Abbatt et al. using a continuous flow, thermal-gradient diffusion chamber. It was demonstrated that the presence of water-soluble species in the particle lowers the vapor-pressure and energy barrier needed for droplet formation. Additionally, Abbatt, Broekhuizen, and Pradeep (Citation2005) showed the additive nature of the vapor-pressure-lowering effect for binary mixtures. Water-uptake was parameterized as droplet activation diameters, and it was reported that for soluble organics, hygroscopicity of the mixed aerosol particles can be predicted using a simple Köhler theory model that assumes complete solubility with the droplet having the surface tension of pure water. However, when organics are less soluble, the consideration of limited solubility was determined to be important. For example, thick organic coatings around an inorganic core can lead to a complete deactivation of ultrafine ammonium sulfate particles (<120 nm) (Abbatt, Broekhuizen, and Pradeep Citation2005). For sparingly soluble and non-hygroscopic species such as adipic acid, Broekhuizen, Kumar, and Abbatt (Citation2004) showed that the presence of a small fraction of a soluble salt can greatly reduce the activation diameter of internally mixed adipic acid – ammonium sulfate particles, and that it can be predicted well by Köhler theory (Broekhuizen, Kumar, and Abbatt Citation2004).

For externally mixed particles, Schill et al. showed that it is possible for the supersaturated water-uptake of each pure component to be differentiated in the measured particle activation curves, however their hygroscopicities must have a big enough difference (Schill et al. Citation2015). For a binary mixture of compounds with similar hygroscopicities, the activation curves do not clearly indicate the number of pure compounds. In contrast, a binary mixture of a highly hygroscopic and a sparingly hygroscopic species led to multiple sigmoid fittings, with each inflection point indicating the presence of a different species (Vu et al. Citation2019; Schill et al. Citation2015).

Much of the literature on the water-uptake of mixed aerosols focuses on the chemical and physical properties of the mixtures and their effect on particle hygroscopicity (Vu et al. Citation2019; Jing et al. Citation2016; Liu et al. Citation2016; Lei et al. Citation2014; Padró et al. Citation2012). Few studies have used multiple instruments to measure, describe, and analyze water-uptake at both subsaturated and supersaturated conditions (Xu et al. Citation2021; Wex et al. Citation2009; Svenningsson et al. Citation2006). Fewer still have evaluated the performance of different hygroscopicity measurement instruments to capture the water-uptake of various systems (Dawson et al. Citation2020; Rickards et al. Citation2013; Zardini et al. Citation2008). For example, Dawson et al. (Citation2020) measured the water-uptake of pure water-soluble organic compounds using a CCNC, HTDMA, and cavity ring-down spectroscopy (CRDS) and found that for pure water-soluble compounds, the three instruments were in agreement (Dawson et al. Citation2020). However, little is known about the comparison of water-uptake instruments for mixed aerosol compositions.

Intercomparison of measured water-uptake across different instruments and systems can be done by first converting the directly measured parameters such as, activation diameters and growth factors, into a single hygroscopicity parameter, (κ). κ is a valuable tool for comparison, as theoretically, it is a composition-dependent parameter and conceptually varies little between sub- and supersaturated conditions (Petters and Kreidenweis Citation2007, Citation2008, Citation2013). Additionally, κ can be used with the Zdanovskii-Stokes-Robinson (ZSR) mixing rule, which assumes volume additivity and that each species independently uptakes water, to predict the hygroscopicity of a mixed system (Petters and Kreidenweis Citation2007; Svenningsson et al. Citation2006).

In this work, we measured the water-uptake of internal and external mixtures of the atmospherically prevalent salt, ammonium sulfate, with three organic compounds (Lei et al. Citation2014; Pashynska et al. Citation2002). The organic compounds used are adipic acid, which is a dicarboxylic acid known to be emitted from biomass burning and motor exhaust, and two sugars: levoglucosan and sucrose, both of which are tracers for biomass burning (Marynowski and Simoneit Citation2022; Hays et al. Citation2002; Kaplan and Kawamura Citation1987). We applied three distinct experimental droplet growth methods to measure the hygroscopicity of binary ammonium sulfate – organic mixtures. The instrumentation has been previously described by Dawson et al. (Citation2020), however the usage and advantages of such suite of instruments have yet to be evaluated for mixed particles. The three organics used in this work are levoglucosan, sucrose, and adipic acid, all of which are prevalent in the atmosphere and have been extensively studied, and all of which are biomass burning byproducts (Ott, Tackman, and Freedman Citation2020; Jing et al. Citation2016; Liu et al. Citation2016; Lei et al. Citation2014; Rickards et al. Citation2013; Yttri, Dye, and Kiss Citation2007; Rosenørn, Kiss, and Bilde Citation2006; Broekhuizen, Kumar, and Abbatt Citation2004; Marcolli et al. Citation2004; Pashynska et al. Citation2002; Cruz and Pandis Citation1998). To our knowledge, this is the first work to evaluate and compare measured binary (internally and externally mixed) aerosol particle water-uptake by CCNC, HTDMA, and CRDS to identify advantages and disadvantages of each instrument toward the estimation of the perceived single-parameter hygroscopicity, κ. Furthermore, we explore the use of Kohler theory and Zdanovskii-Stokes-Robinson (ZSR) models to predict experimental measurements. A layer of complexity is added to this work through the evaluation of two κ retrieval methods from optical measurements of mixed aerosols that have only been applied in few other studies (Razafindrambinina et al. Citation2022; Dawson et al. Citation2020; Kreidenweis and Asa-Awuku Citation2014). In this work, data on external mixtures provide a baseline case for comparison. That is, mixed aerosols of distinct populations can be observed across all platforms and behave similarly to predictions based on thermophysical properties. In comparison, experimental and bottom-up theoretical deviations observed in internal mixtures that cannot be derived from external distinct populations suggest that additional interactions and factors need be explored.

Materials and methods

Sample preparation

As previously mentioned, the three organics selected for this study are relevant and abundant in the atmosphere. However, they were also selected due to their range of atomic oxygen to carbon ratio (O:C), molecular weight, and solubility they provide, which may lend insight into κ variations (). Levoglucosan (99%, ACROS Organics) had the highest density and theoretical κ (κtheory), sucrose (99% Fisher Chemical) had the highest solubility and O:C, and adipic acid (99%, Sigma Aldrich).

Table 1. Physical properties of organic compound, and calculated theoretical κ-values assuming infinite and limited solubility.

Samples were prepared by dissolving 50 mg of solute in 400 ml of UltraPure water (high-performance liquid chromatography grade or Millipore(R) water >18 MΩ). Internally mixed samples were prepared by dissolving 50 mg total solids with 5, 25, 50, 75, and 95 wt % of the organic compound in 400 ml of water. For external mixtures, two separate solutions (0.125 mg/ml) were prepared for ammonium sulfate and the organic compound. The composition of the external mixtures were controlled by valves downstream of each of the atomizers. Prior to HTDMA measurements, each component of the mixture was atomized, dried, and the particle mass concentration (μg m3) of the organic and ammonium sulfate was measured by a DMA in scanning mode. Valves were then adjusted to achieve target organic mass fraction (between 0.05 and 0.95). Polydisperse aerosols were created using a constant output atomizer (TSI 3076). Particles were then dried via two diffusion dryers arranged in series upstream of the three water-uptake measurement instruments: a cloud condensation nuclei counter (CCNC), a humidified tandem differential mobility analyzer, and a cavity ring-down spectrometer ()

Figure 1. Schematic of the three different experimental setups. For each measurement method, setup was modified to the CCNC (red), HTDMA (blue), or CRDS (green) configuration.

Figure 1. Schematic of the three different experimental setups. For each measurement method, setup was modified to the CCNC (red), HTDMA (blue), or CRDS (green) configuration.

Intercomparisons of the hygroscopicities of ammonium sulfate-organic binary mixtures were done by retrieving κ from the measured parameters (critical activation diameters (Dp50), geometric growth factor (Gf), and optical growth factors (fRH)) as detailed below.

Cloud condensation nuclei activity measurements

The dry, polydisperse aerosol stream was first size selected by a differential mobility analyzer (DMA 1; TSI DMA 3081 L) in scanning mode to create a stream of monodisperse aerosol particles. Downstream of electrical mobility selection, the sample flow was split and then sampled into the CCNC (DMT CCN-100, sample flow = 0.5 L min−1) and condensation particle counter (CPC; TSI 3775, sample flow = 0.3 L min−1). The CCNC counted the number of activated particles or cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) at a given supersaturation (in this work, the CCNC was operated at 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, and 1.0% supersaturations), and the CPC provided the total number of particles (CN) at each size bin.

The CCNC method parameterizes water-uptake in terms of a particle’s critical activation diameter (Dp50). The critical activation diameter is defined as the dry particle diameter at which 50% of the population activates into droplets. In this work, the Scanning Mobility CCN Analyzer (SMCA) software was used to obtain the ratio between CCN and CN and estimate Dp50. The SMCA applied a multiple charge correction and fits a sigmoid curve through the measured data to estimate Dp50 (Moore and Nenes Citation2009). A sample output of a CCNC data activation curve and an SMCA sigmoid fit is presented in .

Figure 2. Example of measurement outputs from CCNC (a,b), HTDMA (c,d), and CRDS (e,f) for internal (left) and externally mixed (right) particles. Data fits are shown as solid black lines (sigmoid fit for (a) and (b), lognormal fit for (c) and (d)). Dashed line in (a) and (b) represent 50% particle activation, and dashed blue line in (c) and (d) represent the selected particle size (in this example, 150 nm particles were selected.

Figure 2. Example of measurement outputs from CCNC (a,b), HTDMA (c,d), and CRDS (e,f) for internal (left) and externally mixed (right) particles. Data fits are shown as solid black lines (sigmoid fit for (a) and (b), lognormal fit for (c) and (d)). Dashed line in (a) and (b) represent 50% particle activation, and dashed blue line in (c) and (d) represent the selected particle size (in this example, 150 nm particles were selected.

Internal and externally mixed particles can be distinguished through the measured activation curves. For internally mixed particles, one sigmoid fit is sufficient to capture the measured data, whereas, for external mixtures, the number of sigmoid fits needed is equal to the number of components available for water-uptake in the mixture. In this work, binary external mixtures were presented as two sigmoid curves and were fit as such. As a result, internal mixtures give a single Dp50 value, and binary external mixtures yield two critical activation diameters, one from each sigmoid () (Vu et al. Citation2019; Schill et al. Citation2015).

Assuming that κ-values of each component of the mixtures are adequately differentiable (differences in water-uptake properties are detectable via the analysis software), the activation curve of internal mixtures can be fit well with a single sigmoid (), whereas external mixing can be identified by the presence of more than one sigmoid (). For binary external mixtures, two sigmoid curves are present: one curve represented ammonium sulfate, and the second (at larger diameters) represented the organic () (Vu et al. Citation2019). Calibration of the CCNC was done prior to each experiment with ammonium sulfate aerosol, and the reported instrument supersaturation assumes a van’t Hoff factor of 2.5 (Mikhailov and Vlasenko Citation2020; Rose et al. Citation2008). Hygroscopicity was then expressed in terms of the hygroscopicity parameter (κCCNC) through EquationEquation (1) (Petters and Kreidenweis Citation2007). (1) κCCNC=4(4σs/aMwRTρw)327Dp503ln2s(1)

where σs/a, Mw, and ρw are the surface tension, molecular weight, and density of pure water, respectively. R and T are the gas constant and temperatures, and s is the calibrated instrument supersaturation.

Humidified tandem differential mobility analysis

A humidified tandem differential mobility analyzer (HTDMA) measured the subsaturated growth factor of binary mixtures. Aerosol particles with a dry mobility diameter (Ddry) of 150, 250, and 350 nm were first size selected by an electrostatic classifier (DMA 2; TSI 3082) with an aerosol flowrate of 0.3 L min−1 and sheath flow of 1.0 L min−1. The size-selected particles were then humidified up to 80% ± 6% RH with a Nafion humidification line (PermaPure M.H. series). Subsequently, the size distribution of humidified aerosol particles was measured by a second electrostatic classifier (DMA 3; TSI 3085) that has been humidified to 80% RH to prevent aerosol shrinkage, and the internal neutralizer was bypassed to prevent neutralization of already charged particles (Dawson et al. Citation2020).

For HTDMA experiments, κ was derived from the geometric growth factor (Gf). Gf is the ratio of the humidified particle diameter (Dwet) to its dry size (Ddry) and was calculated using EquationEquation (2). (2) GF= DdryDwet(2)

In the context of this work, Ddry corresponds to the selected particle size, and Dwet is the geometric mode of the probability density function fit of the wet distribution. For internal mixtures, a single wet distribution and growth factor is expected (). In contrast, externally mixed aerosols would present as two wet distributions, and thus, two growth factor values ().

Vapor pressure of water was assumed to approach that of a flat surface, and as such, the water activity can be approximated by RH. Thus, κ can be calculated via EquationEquation (3) (Kreidenweis and Asa-Awuku Citation2014; Petters and Kreidenweis Citation2007). (3) GF3=1+κHTDMA(RH1001(RH100))(3)

Cavity ring-down spectroscopy

The cavity ring-down spectrometer has been previously described in detail (Dawson et al. Citation2020; Veghte and Freedman Citation2012; Freedman et al. Citation2009) and is only briefly described here. The generated aerosol particles at a flow rate of 1.5 L min−1 are size selected using an electrostatic classifier (TSI 3080) and a Differential Mobility Analyzer (DMA 4; TSI 3081 L) at a sheath flow rate of 15 L min−1. After the particles are size selected, they enter the cavity ring down spectrometer, where their optical properties are measured at a 643 nm wavelength. The difference in ring-down times measured with and without the sample present is used to calculate the experimental extinction coefficient (bext), as shown by (4) bext=RLc (1τ1τ0)(4) where RL is the ratio of the cavity length to the sample length, c is the speed of light, τ0 is the ring-down time without any particles in the cavity, and τ is the ring-down time when particles are present. Once the extinction coefficient is measured, the particle concentration, N, is measured using a Condensation Particle Counter (CPC). The extinction cross section (σext) is calculated according to (5) σext=bext,avgNavg(5) where the subscript avg indicates the average measurement.

To obtain optical growth measurements, we use two cavities connected in series with a homebuilt humidifier between them. Once the particles exit the first cavity, they pass through the humidifier, where the RH of the particles is increased and measured at ∼85% in the second cavity. The optical growth factor (fRH) is determined by dividing the extinction cross section of the humidified particles (σext,a) by the extinction cross section of the dry particles (σext,b) (6) fRH(85% RH, Dry)=σext,aσext,b(6) where a is the relative humidity of the humidified particles and b is the relative humidity of the dry particles (<10% RH).

There are currently two methods that are available to calculate a single hygroscopicity parameter from fRH. For the first method, the optical growth factor is converted to the geometric growth factor, Gf, using the experimentally derived refractive indices and Mie theory. Gf has been defined in EquationEquation (2). The diameter of the dry aerosol particles is experimentally selected by the DMA, but the diameter of the humidified particles must be calculated. The humidified diameters are determined by extrapolating the water content of the humidified particle from Mie theory and the optical growth factor calculation. The first step is to calculate the volume weighted refractive index (mt) using (7) mt=iViVtmi(7) where Vi is the volume of component i, Vt is the total volume, and mi is the real portion of the refractive index of the component. Lavallard et al. provided the real part of the refractive index of water at 643 nm I (Lavallard, Rosenbauer, and Gacoin Citation1996). The imaginary portion of the refractive index is not used since the absorption is negligible at 643 nm. To obtain an extinction coefficient for comparison to the experimentally determined extinction coefficient, extinction coefficients for every particle size 0.1 nm above the dry particle diameter were calculated. The diameter with the lowest variation between the calculated optical growth factor and the experimentally determined optical growth factor is used to calculate the geometric growth factor. Once the growth factor is determined, the κ factor can be calculated using EquationEquation (3). It should be distinguished that the assumptions made for this equation are typically used for supersaturated κ factors where the aerosol particles have very high water content (Taylor et al. Citation2011; Petters and Kreidenweis Citation2007).

The second method relates growth factor to optical growth factor through an empirical relationship, as shown by (8) fRH(80%RH,dry)=Gf(80%RH,dry)0.860.28(8) where fRH(80%RH, dry) is the optical growth factor at 80% relative humidity, and Gf (80%RH, dry) is the growth factor at 80% relative humidity. Using EquationEquations (2) and Equation(8), we derive a semi-empirical relation for calculating κ factor as shown by (9) κEmpirical=((fRH(Wet, Dry)3*0.280.86)1)(1RH/100RH/100)(9)

In the original work by Kreidenweis and Asa-Awuku, this correlation was determined on systems at 80% RH; however, our systems are at ∼85% RH. This correlation should be a reasonable approximation at RH ∼90%, and has been previously shown to aptly measure the hygroscopicity of organic saccharides measured at 85% (Dawson et al. Citation2020; Kreidenweis and Asa-Awuku Citation2014).

Modeled hygroscopicity and droplet growth of mixed particles

The Zdanovskii-Stokes-Robinson (ZSR) model has been shown to adequately predict the κ-value of binary mixtures (Xu et al. Citation2020; Jing et al. Citation2016; Liu et al. Citation2016; Petters and Kreidenweis Citation2008; Svenningsson et al. Citation2006). The basic ZSR model assumes volume additivity, and determines the κ of a mixed system based on the volume fraction of each species (ϵi) as shown in EquationEquation (10). (10) κZSR=iϵiκi(10)

EquationEquation (4) works well for infinitely soluble species, but fails to predict the water-uptake of a system when sparingly soluble organics are present (Petters and Kreidenweis Citation2008; Bilde and Svenningsson Citation2004). Hence, for such mixtures, the limited solubility of particles must be considered as it can affect the apparent κ. Changes in κ due to limited solubility can be captured by including a dissolved volume fraction term (H(xi)), by doing so, turning EquationEquation (10) into EquationEquation (11): κZSR,Ci=iϵiκiH(xi) (11) H(xi)= {xi xi<11 xi1(11) xi=Ci(VwVsi)

where Ci, Vw, and Vsi are the solubility of solute in water (volume of compound per unit volume of water), volume of water, and volume of the dry aerosol (soluble and insoluble) (Petters and Kreidenweis Citation2008). Alternatively, Ci in EquationEquation (11) can also be estimated based on their O:C through the empirical relationship in EquationEquation (12) which assumes that the water-uptake activity of sufficiently soluble compounds can be estimated by Raoult’s law, and that O:C and molecular size determine the volatility of the organic compound (Nakao Citation2017). (12) lnCempirical=20[(OC)0.4021]; xi=Cempirical(VwVsi)(12)

Where O and C are the number of oxygen and carbon atoms in the molecule. Based on EquationEquation (12), the solubility range corresponds to O:C range of 0.2 to 0.7. The theoretical κ-value based on this empirically derived solubility will hereinafter be referred to as κZSR,emp. For infinitely soluble species, H(xi) = 1, and so κZSR=κZSR,Ci=κZSR,emp.

In this work, calculated κ of pure levoglucosan, sucrose, adipic acid, and ammonium sulfate was used in all three versions of the ZSR models to predict the hygroscopicity and particle growth of the mixtures. Levoglucosan and adipic acid were predicted to be affected by limited solubility, whereas sucrose would behave as an infinitely soluble particle. Lastly, to compare measured κ-values to the three variations of the ZSR model, a normalized mean error (NME) analysis was done using the equation below: (13) NME= 1n|κmodelκmeasured|1n(κmeasured)(13)

A NME <10% suggests that the model agrees with the data in most instances. The model that leads to the least NME between measured and predicted κ-values was then taken to be the best model for the system.

Results and discussion

Water-uptake of internal mixtures

As previously mentioned, intercomparisons of the hygroscopicities of ammonium sulfate-organic binary mixtures were done by retrieving κ from the measured parameters (Dp50, Gf, fRH). Here, experimental κ-values were compared across instruments and with the ZSR-predicted κ with and without limited solubility considerations ().

Figure 3. Comparison of experimental to ZSR-predicted κ values based on assumptions of infinite solubility as described in EquationEquation (10) (grey dotted), limited solubility as described in EquationEquation (11) (green), and the O:C limited solubility (red dashed) as described in EquationEquation (12) for levoglucosan (blue), sucrose (pink), and adipic acid (purple) binary mixtures as measured by the CCNC (circle), HTDMA (square), and CRDS with Mie theory based (open triangle) and empirical (solid triangle) κ-retrieval methods.

Figure 3. Comparison of experimental to ZSR-predicted κ values based on assumptions of infinite solubility as described in EquationEquation (10)(10) κZSR=∑iϵiκi(10) (grey dotted), limited solubility as described in EquationEquation (11)(11) H(xi)= {xi xi<11 xi≥1(11) (green), and the O:C limited solubility (red dashed) as described in EquationEquation (12)(12) lnCempirical=20[(OC)0.402−1]; xi=Cempirical(VwVsi)(12) for levoglucosan (blue), sucrose (pink), and adipic acid (purple) binary mixtures as measured by the CCNC (circle), HTDMA (square), and CRDS with Mie theory based (open triangle) and empirical (solid triangle) κ-retrieval methods.

Normalized mean error analysis results are presented in . For levoglucosan-ammonium sulfate internal mixtures, κZSR,Ci poorly predicted hygroscopicity, with a NME that was higher than the two other models. κZSR and κZSR,emp were identical for levoglucosan-ammonium sulfate aerosol particles with organic volume fractions <0.8. At higher organic volume fractions, κZSR, emp predicted that limited solubility would affect the particle water-uptake at supersaturated conditions. However, the effect is small, as κZSR and κZSR,emp agreed within 10% uncertainty. Experimentally, internally mixed levoglucosan-ammonium sulfate particles took up water as expected for infinitely soluble species. NME analysis shows that in the scope of our experimental conditions, internally mixed levoglucosan-ammonium sulfate aerosol particles were not limited by solubility at the supersaturated regime and at the RH of the HTDMA as measured κCCNC and κHTDMA were able to be predicted by κZSR with <10% uncertainty. The inability of κZSR,Ci to capture measured hygroscopicity of ammonium sulfate-levoglucosan suggests that the use of bulk solubility may be inaccurate for ammonium sulfate-levoglucosan droplet growth predictions. This inaccuracy when using bulk solubility to capture particle hygroscopicity is consistent with recent literature that have shown changes in intermolecular interactions under supersaturated conditions that lead to changes in hygroscopicity (Wallace et al. Citation2021; Richards et al. Citation2020). As the HTDMA and CRDS were operated at similar RH, their κ-values were expected to be invariant, however, κCRDS, Mie was significantly lower. κZSR and κZSR,emp overpredicted κCRDS,Mie by an average of 20%, with the largest error at organic fractions <0.5, which may simply be due to fluctuations in RH. In summary, internally mixed levoglucosan-ammonium sulfate particles were found to behave as fully soluble particles, and water-uptake measurements using the CCNC and HTDMA were able to be well-predicted by κZSR and κZSR,emp. Additionally, κZSR,Ci that is calculated based on the organic’s bulk solubility was not a good predictor of levoglucosan-ammonium sulfate water-uptake and had an uncertainty of over 20%.

Table 2. Normal mean error analysis of binary internally mixed particle water-uptake.

Sucrose is a highly soluble (2040 g L−1) organic compound with relatively low hygroscopicity compared to ammonium sulfate (). Due to the high solubility of sucrose, for calculations of κZSR,Ci, H(xi) = 1 which leads to κZSR=κZSR,Ci as can be seen in . However, κZSR,emp of sucrose slightly varied from κZSR at organic volume fractions >0.75, suggesting that sucrose may not be fully soluble at under such conditions. However, the difference between κZSR,emp and κZSR is insignificant, with <1% difference between the NME of κZSR and κZSR, emp of sucrose (). In the scope of this article, predictions of internally mixed sucrose-ammonium sulfate water-uptake by all three versions of the ZSR models are considered statistically invariant (). In other words, sucrose droplet predictions and water uptake are not affected by limited solubility. Measured subsaturated water-uptake of internally mixed sucrose-ammonium sulfate particles agreed (within 15% uncertainty) with ZSR predictions. In contrast, uncertainty doubled for supersaturated measurements (), and κCCNC values were overpredicted at organic volume fractions <0.75. This overprediction suggests that at supersaturated conditions, ammonium sulfate and sucrose components do not have equal contributions as suggested by ZSR. It is likely that other factors such as morphology may affect the water-uptake properties of mixed particles as it can promote adsorption driven droplet growth instead of solute driven (ZSR) droplet growth (Barati, Yao, and Asa-Awuku Citation2019; Hatch et al. Citation2008).

In the case of internally mixed adipic acid and ammonium sulfate, κZSR,Ci and κZSR,emp were statistically invariant and are shown as overlapping green and red lines in . κCCNC and κHTDMA of internally mixed adipic acid-ammonium sulfate agreed with κZSR, suggesting that solubility did not affect particle water-uptake. In contrast, κCRDS,Mie was able to be accurately predicted by κZSR,Ci and κZSR,emp.

Note that 2 values of κCRDS were retrieved from fRH measurements (κCRDS, mie and κCRDS, emp) as previously detailed. Values of κCRDS,mie and κCRDS,emp for binary internal mixtures have been found to be comparable for single-component systems (Dawson et al. Citation2020). However, for internally mixed inorganic-organic aerosols, κCRDS,emp was consistently less than its Mie theory derived counterpart. κCRDS,emp of ammonium sulfate-adipic acid was able to be adequately captured by the ZSR models within ∼20%. This deviation is likely because the empirical method of κ retrieval from fRH was formulated based on fRH measurements done at 80% RH with limited experimental data, whereas in this work, RH was set at 85% (Dawson et al. Citation2020; Kreidenweis and Asa-Awuku Citation2014). Although κ-values are RH independent, the empirical relationship is sensitive to limited solubility and thus dependent on RH. The relationship was developed with ammonium sulfate and has been shown to hold for sucrose but may deviate for other compounds with limited solubility measured at different RH. The range of solubilities and RH that the empirical relationship can be used for is a direction for future studies.

Water-uptake of external mixtures

As stated above, the water-uptake of two distinct externally mixed populations may be exhibited in the measurement outputs (). For CCNC and HTDMA, ideally, each chemical component of an external mixture can be distinguished as each species would have its own κ-value. In the case of binary mixtures, externally mixed particles would result in two κ-values, one of ammonium sulfate (κammonium sulfate= 0.6) and one of the organic. However, for CRDS, the average of measured signal results in a single average fRH and κ-value. shows the experimental results for externally mixed particle hygroscopicity.

Figure 4. κ values of binary external mixtures of ammonium sulfate and levoglucosan (blue), sucrose (pink) and adipic acid (purple) as measured by the CCNC (circle), HTDMA (square), and CRDS (triangle). κCRDS was retrieved based on an empirical method (solid symbols) and Mie theory (open symbols). κ of pure ammonium sulfate (grey) and organics are shown as dashed lines. κZSR (solid grey line) is shown with.κCRDS,external

Figure 4. κ values of binary external mixtures of ammonium sulfate and levoglucosan (blue), sucrose (pink) and adipic acid (purple) as measured by the CCNC (circle), HTDMA (square), and CRDS (triangle). κCRDS was retrieved based on an empirical method (solid symbols) and Mie theory (open symbols). κ of pure ammonium sulfate (grey) and organics are shown as dashed lines. κZSR (solid grey line) is shown with.κCRDS,external

All measured κCCNC and κHTDMA values of externally mixed ammonium sulfate and organics were able to show the presence of two externally mixed compounds (). In the case of binary mixtures, each mixture composition resulted in two distinct κCCNC and κHTDMA values. The first κ-value was consistent with κammonium sulfate (0.6) and the second was consistent with the organic compound. A striking observation was made in κCCNC of externally mixed ammonium sulfate-sucrose. Although one of the measured κ-value was consistent with that of sucrose, its inorganic counterpart was consistently lower than κammonium sulfate. Recall that similar overpredictions were observed in the κCCNC of internally mixed ammonium sulfate-sucrose as well. This further suggests that sucrose may affect droplet formation of mixed particles beyond solubility. As sucrose can be viscous, this property may affect the droplet formation of the mixture and should be probed in future studies. In contrast, CRDS-derived κ-values for all mixtures were based on the average signal measured during the cavity ring-down measurements. As such, there were no distinguishable differences in the average κCRDS-values of the external and internal mixtures. Any variation between internal and external κ-values from the CRDS is most likely from background noise in the measurements and are reflected in the error bars.

There was no clear indication of external mixing and κ-values of internal and externally mixed particles were statistically invariable. This aspect of the cavity ring-down method is an important consideration when utilizing the instrument to measure the water-uptake of an unknown system such as ambient air. The average hygroscopicity value will provide the average water-uptake of the aerosol system but will not indicate the mixing state of the system.

Summary

The water-uptake of mixed inorganic-organic systems is complex and is influenced by the solubility, viscosity, hydrophobicity, and surface activity (Xu et al. Citation2021; Tandon, Rothfuss, and Petters Citation2019; Petters and Kreidenweis Citation2008). In this work, hygroscopicity of binary inorganic-organic mixtures was compared across three instrumental methods, four κ retrieval methods, and under sub- and supersaturated conditions. For internally mixed ammonium sulfate-organic mixtures, CCNC and HTDMA measured hygroscopicities were in good agreement, and for externally mixed aerosols, the two methods were able to show the presence of two distinct, pure particle populations, a key characteristic of external mixtures. Additionally, this work is the first to compare three versions of the ZSR model and shows that for some internally mixed particles such as the ammonium sulfate-levoglucosan mixtures, the use of bulk solubility (κZSR,Ci) is not always accurate. This work shows that different instruments can have complementary advantages, and to get a clearer picture of mixed aerosol particle hygroscopicity, the use of more than one instrument is highly advisable. For example, when measuring complex systems such as ambient aerosols, the use of cavity ring-down can measure the average water-uptake of a system, but to gain insight on particle mixing states, it must be coupled with a CCNC or HTDMA. The results in this work may provide more insight into the perceived hygroscopicity of complex mixtures and supports the development of future high-resolution hygroscopicity measurement methods.

Author contributions

PNR and KAM, TMR, DDD, AAA designed and conducted the CCN and H-TDMA experiments. KD, JND, and MAF conducted experiments, and performed the calculations using the CRDS data. PNR conducted modeling analysis across all three data sets and prepared the manuscript with input from all the coauthors.

Data availability

The data is available upon request from the corresponding authors as stated.

Disclosure statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Funding

PNR, KAM, and AAA acknowledge support from the NSF: AGS-1723920 and AGS-2124489. KD, JND, MAF acknowledge support from NSF: AGS-2124490. PNR and JND also acknowledge support from NSF GRFP Awards (1840340 & 1255832). DDD and TMR acknowledge support from the NSF: AGS-2124491.

References

  • Abbatt, J. P. D., K. Broekhuizen, and K. P. Pradeep. 2005. Cloud condensation nucleus activity of internally mixed ammonium sulfate/organic acid aerosol particles. Atmos. Environ. 39 (26):4767–78. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.04.029.
  • Altaf, M. B., D. D. Dutcher, T. M. Raymond, and M. A. Freedman. 2018. Effect of particle morphology on cloud condensation nuclei activity. ACS Earth Space Chem. 2 (6):634–9. doi:10.1021/acsearthspacechem.7b00146.
  • Barati, F., Q. Yao, and A. A. Asa-Awuku. 2019. Insight into the role of water-soluble organic solvents for the cloud condensation nuclei activation of cholesterol. ACS Earth Space Chem. 3 (9):1697–705. doi:10.1021/acsearthspacechem.9b00161.
  • Bilde, M, and B. Svenningsson. 2004. CCN activation of slightly soluble organics: The importance of small amounts of inorganic salt and particle phase. Tellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology 56 (2):128–34. doi:10.3402/tellusb.v56i2.16406.
  • Broekhuizen, K., P. P. Kumar, and J. P. D. Abbatt. 2004. Partially soluble organics as cloud condensation nuclei: Role of trace soluble and surface active species. Geophys. Res. Lett. 31 (1):1–5. doi:10.1029/2003GL018203.
  • Brooks, S. D., M. E. Wise, M. Cushing, and M. A. Tolbert. 2002. Deliquescence behavior of organic/ammonium sulfate aerosol. Geophys. Res. Lett. 29 (19):23–1–5. doi:10.1029/2002GL014733.
  • Cruz, C. N, and S. N. Pandis. 2000. Deliquescence and hygroscopic growth of mixed inorganic − organic atmospheric aerosol. Environ. Sci. Technol. 34 (20):4313–9. doi:10.1021/es9907109.
  • Cruz, C. N, and S. N. Pandis. 1998. The effect of organic coatings on the cloud condensation nuclei activation of inorganic atmospheric aerosol. J. Geophys. Res. 103 (D11):13111–23. doi:10.1029/98JD00979.
  • Dawson, J. N., K. A. Malek, P. N. Razafindrambinina, T. M. Raymond, D. D. Dutcher, A. A. Asa-Awuku, and M. A. Freedman. 2020. Direct comparison of the submicron aerosol hygroscopicity of water-soluble sugars. ACS Earth Space Chem. 4 (12):2215–26. doi:10.1021/acsearthspacechem.0c00159.
  • Freedman, M. A., C. A. Hasenkopf, M. R. Beaver, and M. A. Tolbert. 2009. Optical properties of internally mixed aerosol particles composed of dicarboxylic acids and ammonium sulfate. J. Phys. Chem. A 113 (48):13584–92. doi:10.1021/jp906240y.
  • Hatch, C. D., K. M. Gierlus, J. D. Schuttlefield, and V. H. Grassian. 2008. Water adsorption and cloud condensation nuclei activity of calcite and calcite coated with model humic and fulvic acids. Atmos. Environ. 42 (22):5672–84. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.03.005.
  • Hays, M. D., C. D. Geron, K. J. Linna, N. D. Smith, and J. J. Schauer. 2002. Speciation of gas-phase and fine particle emissions from burning of foliar fuels. Environ. Sci. Technol. 36 (11):2281–95. doi:10.1021/es0111683.
  • Haywood, J, and O. Boucher. 2000. Estimates of the direct and indirect radiative forcing due to tropospheric aerosols: A review. Rev. Geophys. 38 (4):513–43. doi:10.1029/1999RG000078.
  • IPCC. 2021. Climate change 2021: The physical science basis. In Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Jimenez, J. L., M. R. Canagaratna, N. M. Donahue, A. S. H. Prevot, Q. Zhang, J. H. Kroll, P. F. DeCarlo, J. D. Allan, H. Coe, N. L. Ng, et al. 2009. Evolution of organic aerosols in the atmosphere. Science 326 (5959):1525–9. doi:10.1126/science.1180353.
  • Jing, B., S. Tong, Q. Liu, K. Li, W. Wang, Y. Zhang, and M. Ge. 2016. Hygroscopic behavior of multicomponent organic aerosols and their internal mixtures with ammonium sulfate. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 16 (6):4101–18. doi:10.5194/acp-16-4101-2016.
  • Kanakidou, M., J. H. Seinfeld, S. N. Pandis, I. Barnes, F. J. Dentener, M. C. Facchini, R. Van Dingenen, B. Ervens, A. Nenes, C. J. Nielsen, et al. 2005. Organic aerosol and global climate modelling: A review. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 5 (4):1053–123. doi:10.5194/acp-5-1053-2005.
  • Kaplan, I. R, and K. Kawamura. 1987. Motor exhaust emissions as a primary source for dicarboxylic acids in Los Angeles ambient air. Environ. Sci. Technol. 21 (1):105–10. doi:10.1021/es00155a014.
  • Kreidenweis, S. M, and A. Asa-Awuku. 2014. Aerosol hygroscopicity: Particle water content and its role in atmospheric processes. In Treatise on geochemistry, ed. H. D. Holland, and K. K. Turekian, 2nd ed., 331–361. Elsevier. doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-095975-7.00418-6.
  • Lavallard, P., M. Rosenbauer, and T. Gacoin. 1996. Influence of surrounding dielectrics on the spontaneous emission of sulforhodamine B molecules. Phys. Rev. A 54 (6):5450–3. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.54.5450.
  • Lei, T., A. Zuend, W. G. Wang, Y. H. Zhang, and M. F. Ge. 2014. Hygroscopicity of organic compounds from biomass burning and their influence on the water uptake of mixed organic ammonium sulfate aerosols. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 14 (20):11165–83. doi:10.5194/acp-14-11165-2014.
  • Liu, Q., B. Jing, C. Peng, S. Tong, W. Wang, and M. Ge. 2016. Hygroscopicity of internally mixed multi-component aerosol particles of atmospheric relevance. Atmos. Environ. 125:69–77. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.11.003.
  • Lohmann, U, and J. Feichter. 2005. Atmospheric chemistry and physics global indirect aerosol effects: A review. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 5 (3):715–37. doi:10.5194/acp-5-715-2005.
  • Marcolli, C., B. Luo, T. Peter, and F. G. Wienhold. 2004. Internal mixing of the organic aerosol by gas phase diffusion of semivolatile organic compounds. Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. 4 (5):5789–806. doi:10.5194/acpd-4-5789-2004.
  • Marynowski, L, and B. R. T. Simoneit. 2022. Saccharides in atmospheric particulate and sedimentary organic matter: Status overview and future perspectives. Chemosphere 288 (Pt 1):132376. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132376.
  • Mikhailov, E. F, and S. S. Vlasenko. 2020. High-humidity tandem differential mobility analyzer for accurate determination of aerosol hygroscopic growth, microstructure, and activity coefficients over a wide range of relative humidity. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 13 (4):2035–56. doi:10.5194/amt-13-2035-2020.
  • Moore, R. H, and A. Nenes. 2009. Scanning flow CCN analysis method for fast measurements of CCN spectra. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 43 (12):1192–207. doi:10.1080/02786820903289780.
  • Nakao, S. 2017. Why would apparent κ linearly change with O/C? Assessing the role of volatility, solubility, and surface activity of organic aerosols. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 51 (12):1377–88. doi:10.1080/02786826.2017.1352082.
  • Nandy, L., Y. Yao, Z. Zheng, and N. Riemer. 2021. Water uptake and optical properties of mixed organic-inorganic particles. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 55 (12):1398–413. doi:10.1080/02786826.2021.1966378.
  • Ott, E. J. E., E. C. Tackman, and M. A. Freedman. 2020. Effects of sucrose on phase transitions of organic/inorganic aerosols. ACS Earth Space Chem. 4 (4):591–601. doi:10.1021/acsearthspacechem.0c00006.
  • Padró, L. T., R. H. Moore, X. Zhang, N. Rastogi, R. J. Weber, and A. Nenes. 2012. Mixing state and compositional effects on CCN activity and droplet growth kinetics of size-resolved CCN in an urban environment. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 12 (21):10239–55. doi:10.5194/acp-12-10239-2012.
  • Pashynska, V., R. Vermeylen, G. Vas, W. Maenhaut, and M. Claeys. 2002. Development of a gas chromatographic/ion trap mass spectrometric metod for the determination of levoglucosan and saccharidic compounds in atmospheric aerosols. Application to urban aerosols. J. Mass Spectrom. 37 (12):1249–57. doi:10.1002/jms.391.
  • Petters, M. D, and S. M. Kreidenweis. 2013. A single parameter representation of hygroscopic growth and cloud condensation nucleus activity – Part 3: Including surfactant partitioning. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 13 (2):1081–91. doi:10.5194/acp-13-1081-2013.
  • Petters, M. D, and S. M. Kreidenweis. 2008. A single parameter representation of hygroscopic growth and cloud condensation nucleus activity – Part 2: Including solubility. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 8 (20):6273–9. doi:10.5194/acp-8-6273-2008.
  • Petters, M. D, and S. M. Kreidenweis. 2007. A single parameter representation of hygroscopic growth and cloud condensation nucleus activity. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 7 (8):1961–71. doi:10.5194/acp-7-1961-2007.
  • Prenni, A. J., P. J. DeMott, S. M. Kreidenweis, D. E. Sherman, L. M. Russell, and Y. Ming. 2001. The effects of low molecular weight dicarboxylic acids on cloud formation. J. Phys. Chem. A 105 (50):11240–8. doi:10.1021/jp012427d.
  • Prenni, A. J., M. D. Petters, S. M. Kreidenweis, P. J. DeMott, and P. J. Ziemann. 2007. Cloud droplet activation of secondary organic aerosol. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 112 (10):1–12. doi:10.1029/2006JD007963.
  • Raymond, T. M, and S. N. Pandis. 2003. Formation of cloud droplets by multicomponent organic particles. J. Geophys. Res. 108 (D15):10–1–10-8. doi:10.1029/2003JD003503.
  • Razafindrambinina, P. N., K. A. Malek, J. N. Dawson, K. DiMonte, T. M. Raymond, D. D. Dutcher, M. A. Freedman, and A. Asa-Awuku. 2022. Hygroscopicity of internally mixed ammonium sulfate and secondary organic aerosol particles formed at low and high relative humidity. Environ. Sci: Atmos. 2 (2):202–14. doi:10.1039/D1EA00069A.
  • Richards, D. S., K. L. Trobaugh, J. Hajek-Herrera, C. L. Price, C. S. Sheldon, J. F. Davies, and R. D. Davis. 2020. Ion-molecule interactions enable unexpected phase transitions in organic-inorganic aerosol. Sci. Adv. 6 (47):eabb5643. doi:10.1126/sciadv.abb5643.
  • Rickards, A. M. J., R. E. H. Miles, J. F. Davies, F. H. Marshall, and J. P. Reid. 2013. Measurements of the sensitivity of aerosol hygroscopicity and the κ parameter to the O/C ratio. J. Phys. Chem. A 117 (51):14120–31. doi:10.1021/jp407991n.
  • Riemer, N., A. P. Ault, M. West, R. L. Craig, and J. H. Curtis. 2019. Aerosol mixing state: measurements, modeling, and impacts. Rev. Geophys. 57 (2):187–249. doi:10.1029/2018RG000615.
  • Rose, D., S. S. Gunthe, E. Mikhailov, G. P. Frank, U. Dusek, M. O. Andreae, and U. Pöschl. 2008. Calibration and measurement uncertainties of a continuous-flow cloud condensation nuclei counter (DMT-CCNC): CCN activation of ammonium sulfate and sodium chloride aerosol particles in theory and experiment. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 8 (5):1153–79. doi:10.5194/acp-8-1153-2008.
  • Rosenørn, T., G. Kiss, and M. Bilde. 2006. Cloud droplet activation of saccharides and levoglucosan particles. Atmos. Environ. 40 (10):1794–802. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.11.024.
  • Schill, S. R., D. B. Collins, C. Lee, H. S. Morris, G. A. Novak, K. A. Prather, P. K. Quinn, C. M. Sultana, A. V. Tivanski, K. Zimmermann, et al. 2015. The impact of aerosol particle mixing state on the hygroscopicity of sea spray aerosol. ACS Cent. Sci. 1 (3):132–41. doi:10.1021/acscentsci.5b00174.
  • Svenningsson, B., J. Rissler, E. Swietlicki, M. Mircea, M. Bilde, M. C. Facchini, S. Decesari, S. Fuzzi, J. Zhou, J. Mønster, et al. 2006. Hygroscopic growth and critical supersaturations for mixed aerosol particles of inorganic and organic compounds of atmospheric relevance. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 6 (7):1937–52. doi:10.5194/acp-6-1937-2006.
  • Tandon, A., Rothfuss, N. E., and Petters, M. D. 2019. The effect of hydrophobic glassy organic material on the cloud condensation nuclei activity of internally mixed particles with different particle morphologies. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 19:3325–39. doi:10.5194/acp-19-3325-2019.
  • Taylor, N. F., D. R. Collins, C. W. Spencer, D. H. Lowenthal, B. Zielinska, V. Samburova, and N. Kumar. 2011. Measurement of ambient aerosol hydration state at Great Smoky Mountains National Park in the southeastern United States. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 11 (23):12085–107. doi:10.5194/acp-11-12085-2011.
  • VanReken, T. M., N. L. Ng, R. C. Flagan, and J. H. Seinfeld. 2005. Cloud condensation nucleus activation properties of biogenic secondary organic aerosol. J. Geophys. Res. 110 (D7):1–9. doi:10.1029/2004JD005465.
  • Veghte, D. P, and M. A. Freedman. 2012. The necessity of microscopy to characterize the optical properties of size-selected, nonspherical aerosol particles. Anal. Chem. 84 (21):9101–8. doi:10.1021/ac3017373.
  • Vu, D., S. Gao, T. Berte, M. Kacarab, Q. Yao, K. Vafai, and A. Asa-Awuku. 2019. External and internal cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) mixtures: Controlled laboratory studies of varying mixing states. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 12 (8):4277–89. doi:10.5194/amt-12-4277-2019.
  • Wallace, B. J., C. L. Price, J. F. Davies, and T. C. Preston. 2021. Multicomponent diffusion in atmospheric aerosol particles. Environ. Sci: Atmos. 1 (1):45–55. doi:10.1039/D0EA00008F.
  • Wex, H., M. D. Petters, C. M. Carrico, E. Hallbauer, A. Massling, G. R. McMeeking, L. Poulain, Z. Wu, S. M. Kreidenweis, and F. Stratmann. 2009. Towards closing the gap between hygroscopic growth and activation for secondary organic aerosol: Part 1 – Evidence from measurements. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 9 (12):3987–97. doi:10.5194/acp-9-3987-2009.
  • Xu, W., K. N. Fossum, J. Ovadnevaite, C. Lin, R. Huang, C. O. Dowd, and D. Ceburnis. 2021. The impact of aerosol size-dependent hygroscopicity and mixing state on the cloud condensation nuclei potential over the Northeast Atlantic. Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. 21 (11):1–31.
  • Xu, W., J. Ovadnevaite, K. N. Fossum, C. Lin, R.-J. Huang, C. O'Dowd, and D. Ceburnis. 2020. Aerosol hygroscopicity and its link to chemical composition in the coastal atmosphere of Mace Head: Marine and continental air masses. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 20 (6):3777–91. doi:10.5194/acp-20-3777-2020.
  • Yttri, K. E., C. Dye, and G. Kiss. 2007. Ambient aerosol concentrations of sugars and sugar-alcohols at four different sites in Norway. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 7 (16):4267–79. doi:10.5194/acp-7-4267-2007.
  • Zardini, A. A., S. Sjogren, C. Marcolli, U. K. Krieger, M. Gysel, E. Weingartner, U. Baltensperger, and T. Peter. 2008. A combined particle trap/HTDMA hygroscopicity study of mixed inorganic/organic aerosol particles. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 8 (18):5589–601. doi:10.5194/acp-8-5589-2008.
  • Zhang, F., Z. Li, Y. Li, Y. Sun, Z. Wang, P. Li, L. Sun, P. Wang, M. Cribb, C. Zhao, et al. 2016. Impacts of organic aerosols and its oxidation level on CCN activity from measurement at a suburban site in China. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 16 (8):5413–25. doi:10.5194/acp-16-5413-2016.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.