239
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

How Do Light and Intermittent Smokers Differ from Heavy Smokers in Young Adulthood: The Role of Smoking Restraint Strategies

, Ph.D., , Ph.D. & , Ph.D.
Pages 153-158 | Received 26 Oct 2015, Accepted 14 Mar 2016, Published online: 27 Apr 2016
 

ABSTRACT

Light and intermittent smoking has become a prevalent pattern of use among young adults. Little is known about which factors differentiate light and intermittent smokers (LITS) from heavy smokers (HS) in young adulthood. In this study, we compare young adult LITS with HS with regard to demographic- and smoking-related variables, self-control abilities, and concrete strategies of smoking restraint. The data were collected as part of an Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) study with 137 German young adult smokers (M Age = 21.1 years, 46.0% female; 76 HS [≥10 cigarettes/day] and 61 LITS [≤5 cigarettes/day]). Participants were recruited over the Internet and completed a baseline questionnaire online. Several variables differentiated LITS and HS in a multiple logistic regression analysis: LITS reported fewer smoking friends (p < .001) and a higher self-efficacy to resist smoking (p < .01). Further, LITS smoking status was associated with reporting a past quit attempt (p < .05) and the use of smoking restraint strategies (counting, limiting, and purposefully not smoking cigarettes; p < .05). Notably, nicotine dependence and trait self-control abilities did not differentiate between LITS and HS. Our results point to the role of smoking restraint strategies and self-monitoring of smoking to limit the daily number of cigarettes smoked.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all participants.

Funding

This work was supported by a competitive research grant (GRAND scheme) from Pfizer, Inc. awarded to Dr. Bühler. Preparation of this manuscript was supported in part by National Cancer Institute (NCI CA-U01-154240 and CA-R25-113710). The sponsors had no involvement in the design of the study, collection, analysis or interpretation of the data, the writing of the manuscript, or the decision to submit the article for publication.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by a competitive research grant (GRAND scheme) from Pfizer, Inc. awarded to Dr. Bühler. Preparation of this manuscript was supported in part by National Cancer Institute (NCI CA-U01-154240 and CA-R25-113710). The sponsors had no involvement in the design of the study, collection, analysis or interpretation of the data, the writing of the manuscript, or the decision to submit the article for publication.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 94.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.