5,631
Views
69
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

“It can always happen”: The impact of urinary incontinence on elderly men and women

, , &
Pages 166-173 | Received 13 Jan 2006, Published online: 12 Jul 2009

Abstract

Objective. To determine the impact of urinary incontinence (UI) on the quality of life of the elderly in the general population and to identify factors with the greatest effect. Design. Qualitative and quantitative analyses of interview data. Setting. Patients from the nine family practices of the Nijmegen University Research Network. Subjects. Independently living patients aged 60 and over. Main outcome measures. All independently living patients aged 60 and over with uncomplicated UI were interviewed at home using the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and open-ended questions. Results. In total, 56 men and 314 women were interviewed. A majority do not have such an impact. In the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ) emotional well-being was most affected. Half to one-third of the patients felt nervous, embarrassed, or frustrated because of their incontinence. In the social domain “clothing” and “fear of odour” scored the highest impact. The most affected practical consequence in the IIQ was “going to places where you are not sure about the availability of a toilet” followed by “travelling longer than 20 minutes” and “entertainment”. Men reported higher impact scores than women, despite the fact that incontinence was less severe in men. The most important effect of incontinence reported in men was “being out of control” while most women considered “feeling impelled to take several precautions” to be the most important consequence of UI. Conclusion. UI affects nearly half of patients, particularly as regards their emotional well-being and in public activities. Men experienced more impact compared with women and experienced loss of control more often than women.

Introduction

Urinary incontinence (UI) is a common condition in the general population, especially in the elderly Citation[1]. At the same time, there is a recognized discrepancy between the number of women who report UI and the number who seek help Citation[2]. Reluctance to seek treatment may be due to the perception of incontinence as a taboo subject or because urinary leakage does not substantially interfere with an individual's daily life. Data to support either view are scarce.

The literature presents conflicting information on the importance of UI as a health problem for those afflicted. Some studies have suggested that UI has a major impact on well-being; other studies conclude that the effect is more modest Citation[3–5]. A possible explanation for these contradictory results could be related to the non-standardized definition of UI and the lack of standardized questionnaires. Health-related quality of life has been a widely used term with little consensus about what it means and how best to measure it. Generally there is agreement that quality of life is a multidimensional construct that refers to patients’ perception of and satisfaction with their well-being. Health-related quality of life includes specific dimensions of physical, psychological, and social health, as well as global perceptions of function and well-being Citation[5].

Urinary incontinence (UI) affects nearly half of elderly patients in their daily life.

  • UI in the elderly affects mostly emotional well-being.

  • Men report higher impact scores than women, despite the fact that incontinence is less severe in men.

  • Men report “being out of control” as the most important effect of UI while most women consider “feeling impelled to take precautions” to be most important.

It is important to know the effect UI has on health-related quality of life because it affects not only the patient's ability and willingness to seek help but also the ability to benefit from treatment. This knowledge is useful in designing the approaches to patients who are affected by UI but do not explicitly ask for help.

The importance of UI as a health problem for those affected has mainly been studied in middle-aged women and/or in clinical settings Citation[7], Citation[8]. Relatively little is known about the impact of uncomplicated UI on daily life in the elderly in the general population, especially in men. Because elderly men seek help for less severe UI than women Citation[9] this study also focused on the differences between the sexes in the impact of UI on daily life.

The aim of this study was to determine the impact of uncomplicated UI on quality of life in elderly men and women in the general population and to identify factors with the greatest effect.

Material and methods

This study was part of a large study on UI conducted in the eastern part of the Netherlands between January 1999 and January 2002 Citation[1], Citation[2], Citation[9]. Subjects were recruited from the practice populations of the nine practices of the Nijmegen Monitoring Project, the academic registration network of the Department of General Practice of University Medical Centre Nijmegen, the Netherlands Citation[10].

All the patients considered for this study had reported symptoms of UI in a survey of the entire practice population aged 60 years and older (). With a response rate of 88%, this survey revealed incontinence in 920 (20%) patients and 519 (56%) of them indicated that they were prepared to participate in a follow-up study. The response was similar in men and women and in the different age groups.

Figure 1.  Flowchart of the study population

Figure 1.  Flowchart of the study population

UI was defined in accordance with the Dutch guidelines for general practitioners as the involuntary loss of urine at least twice a month Citation[11]. Post-micturition dribbling in men was not considered a symptom of UI. The study focused on uncomplicated UI in community-dwelling elderly people because the uncomplicated UI is the most prevalent type of UI in general practice on which the UI guideline is based. Therefore, patients with a neurological or psychiatric disorder, patients who had previously undergone unsuccessful surgery for UI and patients living in homes for the elderly were excluded (see flow chart, ). The interviews were conducted at home and lasted up to an hour. During the interviews, the following data were collected:

(a) Background characteristics

  • age, gender, civil status, level of education, duration of symptoms;

  • the type of incontinence: determined on the basis of the following questionsCitation[12]: “does loss of urine occur at moments of increased pressure, for example, when sneezing, jumping or coughing?” and “do you experience such a strong urge that you fail to reach the toilet in time?” According to these questions urge incontinence was defined as: involuntary loss of urine during strong urge, in the absence of stress symptoms. Stress incontinence was defined as: involuntary loss of urine during increased abdominal pressure, in the absence of urge symptoms.

  • the severity of incontinence: assessed by the PRAFAB score (= Protection, Amount, Frequency, Adjustment, Body image) Citation[13]. The questionnaire involved questions on the use of protective pads, the amount of urine lost each time, the frequency of involuntary loss of urine, the limitation of activities in daily life, and the effects on self-image. According to the PRAFAB score the following categories were distinguished: mild (1–7 points), moderate (8–13 points), and severe (14–20 points).

(b) Health-related quality of life

We used the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ) to determine the impact of UI on daily life Citation[14–17]. The IIQ is a disease specific health-related quality of life instrument and is designed to measure the specific consequences of UI on the quality of life. We opted for a disease-specific questionnaire because it allows a more in-depth assessment of specific concerns pertinent to UI. We opted for the IIQ because it is a widely used and well-tested questionnaire and it contains four domains of daily life. It determines the impact of involuntary loss of urine on daily physical activities (6 questions), social functioning (10 questions); emotional well-being (8 questions), and travel (6 questions). The subjects were asked to tick one answer for each multiple-choice question; the possible answers were: none (= 0 points), some (= 1 point), moderate (= 2 points) and severe (= 3 points).

We also performed in-depth interviews that encouraged patients to tell us about embarrassing aspects and because it could identify hypotheses that were not initially anticipated. The same trained interviewer carried out all interviews. The interview consisted of the following topics: does UI impact on your daily life and if so what are the most troubling aspects? All the answers were recorded on tape.

Statistical analysis

Qualitative data on the impact on daily life were fully typed out and analysed with the help of the ATLAS ti software program (Visual Qualitative Data Management Model Building Version WIN 4.2). The qualitative approach used in this study was based on the categorizing process in grounded theory where categories are derived through open and selective coding Citation[18]. Two researchers did the open coding independently of one another. Quantitative data were analysed with the help of SPSS for Windows. We calculated the mean of each question, of each domain, and of the total IIQ score. The means were transformed into continuous scales ranging from 0 to 100. Statistical differences between male and female patients were analysed by the chi-squared test between patients who experienced impact and those who did not and between the four groups of patients who experienced no impact, some impact, moderate impact, and severe impact. The sex differences between the domains were analysed by the t-test. We used p < 0.01 to indicate statistical significance. If 50% of the questions or more in the domain were not applicable, the data of these cases were not included in the analysis of the mean of the domain score.

Results

The research population comprised 56 male and 314 female patients with uncomplicated UI. The patients who indicated on the questionnaire that they have UI and who did not want to be interviewed were older in age and had more comorbidity but did not differ in gender. Twenty-two patients dropped out because of a technical error that occurred during the recording of the qualitative part of the interviews (see ). The analysis consequently involved the data on 55 men and 293 women.

Characteristics and urogenital symptoms in the population

Male and female patients differed significantly in the type and severity of UI () experienced. In men urge incontinence was the most common type compared with mixed incontinence in women. The incontinence was more severe in women compared with men.

Table I.  Characteristics of the study population.

Impact of urinary incontinence

The IIQ indicated that UI affected emotional well-being in particular (). Half to one-third of the patients felt nervous/anxious, embarrassed, or frustrated because of their incontinence. The impact score for the items fear, anger, embarrassment, and sleeping problems were significantly higher in men than in women.

Table II.  Percentage of patients who indicate experiencing some, moderate, or severe impact, the impact score for each question of the IIQ, and the impact score for each domain, in male and female patients with UI (n = 348).

In the social domain, the fear that someone could see the UI, “clothing”, scored the highest impact, reported by 20% of the male and 10% of the female patients (see ). The impact score was significantly higher in men. Some 13% of the men were also afraid that someone could smell their UI. This item scored a very low impact for women.

Concerning travel, 31–37% of the patients reported feeling restricted going to places where they were not sure about the availability of a toilet, with a high impact score of 26.8 in men and 19.5 in women. Men in particular felt restricted when it came to travelling for longer distances (see ).

Finally, about 10% of the patients restricted their physical activities. The impact score for almost all items was higher in men than in women except for three items on the physical activities list: physical recreation, household chores, and repair work in home or garden.

The greatest effect of UI on daily life reported could be divided into “being unable to control the incontinence” and “feeling forced to take several precautions”. One in 10 patients did not experience any impact.

Two-thirds of the men and 4 out of 10 women felt unable to exert control over their incontinence (see Box 1), which resulted in fear of an accident and fear of discovery of the UI, especially in the case of urgency and frequency (n = 118). Forty-two patients expressed feelings of disgust at being wet and dirty almost all the time and the feeling of becoming old.

One-fifth of the men and half the women reported the precautions they had to take as the greatest burden (see Box 2) (n = 80). Trying to prevent odour, wetness, and discovery, patients felt forced to change pads and/or clothes frequently and therefore they always had to take pads and/or extra clothes with them. In addition, they always needed the security of a toilet nearby. Changing pads or clothes at night was considered particularly unpleasant.

Furthermore some patients considered the necessity off having to use pads distressing (n = 56) and finally restrictions in physical activities were also mentioned (n = 14).

Discussion

Most studies that have evaluated the consequences of UI on the quality of life have been performed in selected samples of clinical patients and only a few studies have measured the impact of UI in men as well in women with a disease-specific health-related quality of life questionnaire. As far as we know this is the first study concerning the impact of UI on elderly men and women in the general population using a disease-specific questionnaire combined with a qualitative approach.

UI affects emotional well-being more than anything else. Half to one-third of the patients, more men than women, experienced feelings of anxiety, frustration, and embarrassment. Men also experienced more sleep disorder and feelings of depression. Travelling, going to places where they do not know whether there is a toilet present, and shopping are the outdoor activities most restricted by UI. The men in particular made efforts to prevent odour and felt UI imposed clothing restrictions. About 10% of the patients felt restricted in physical activities. A substantial number of the patients also indicated that UI did not interfere with their daily life. This is probably the reason why some are reluctant to seek help. The interviews did not provide any indication that UI is considered a taboo by patients.

The most distressing consequences of UI were said to be being out of control and feeling forced to take several precautions to prevent an “accident”.

Previous studies asserted that those patients who are most successful at managing incontinence are able to “pass for normal” and remain socially and physically active Citation[19–21].

The way in which people respond to stressful events, in this case UI, is called coping. Changing pads or clothing, locating and staying near a toilet, reorganizing daily activities, and taking clean clothes or protective pads with them when they leave the house are considered a problem- and activity-oriented way of coping. A passive-emotional-oriented way of coping is avoiding situations and feeling angry or frustrated. Passive-emotional-oriented coping strategies have a significant correlation with a reduction in well-being and active-problem-oriented coping strategies improve quality of life Citation[21]. Therefore patients with UI may benefit from active-problem-oriented coping strategies.

In general men are more used to use active-problem-oriented strategies while women apply more passive-emotional-oriented strategies Citation[22], Citation[23]. This study shows that because of incontinence men feel more out of control and experience more emotional impact compared with women. This suggests when affected by UI men apply more passive-emotional-oriented strategies, which is contrary to general male coping strategies. An explanation for this discrepancy might be that women associate UI with pregnancy and childbirth and they consider UI a normal part of being female. Moreover, women have acquired skills whilst managing menstrual bleeding and that also might explain their more frequent and less inhibited use of pads Citation[24], Citation[25].

The fact that as far as UI is concerned the emotional and social well-being of men is more affected than that of women is in line with a study by Fultz et al. Citation[4]. In contrast, Dugan et al. Citation[26] and Ouslander et al. Citation[27] did not find any differences between the sexes; the latter studied a selected population of outpatients from an incontinence clinic.

The strengths of the study are that we combined quantitative and qualitative data to determine the impact of UI on the several domains of daily life and at the same time examined which aspects patients find most distressing. A limitation is that, because we focused on uncomplicated UI, the number of male patients included in the study was quite low. Many men had to be excluded because of complicated neurological diseases. Furthermore, selection based on the selective response to the invitation for an interview among the people who were part of the initial sample could have influenced the results. It may be that embarrassment was an important factor in the decision not to participate in the interview. However, previous research on the impact of UI on in middle-aged women in the Netherlands also concluded that the impact of UI on daily life seemed to be limited. In these studies too embarrassment was not a factor of importance for not seeking help Citation[28], Citation[29].

Finally, we used the IIQ to measure the impact of UI on daily life. In the last few years several studies have been performed on the validity of this questionnaire Citation[15–17]. The results of these studies are contradictory, especially for the use of the IIQ in clinical trials to determine the effect of treatment. Because the aim of this study was to determine the impact of UI on different aspects of daily life and to identify factors with the greatest effect the IIQ is a useful and valid instrument.

We conclude that in a large proportion of the community-dwelling elderly patients uncomplicated UI does not interfere with individuals’ daily life and that this is why they do not seek help. A taboo does not appear to be an important factor in the reluctance to seek help. In about half the patients UI has a notable effect on their emotional and social well-being. Despite incontinence in men being less severe they experience more distress than women. Most men report feeling that it is impossible to control incontinence while women feel forced to take precautions and for them that is the worst aspect of incontinence. Coping strategies seem to play an important part in the impact of UI on daily life.

Because of low motivation, comorbidity, and reduced health expectation in elderly patients we have to focus our attention not only on an effective treatment for incontinence itself but also on the improvement of strategies for coping with incontinence.

References

  • Teunissen TAM, van Weel C, Lagro-Janssen ALM. Prevalence of urinary-, fecal and double incontinence in the elderly living at home. Int Urogynecol J 2004; 15: 10–13
  • Teunissen TAM, van Weel C, Lagro-Janssen ALM. Urinary incontinence in community dwelling elderly: who are seeking help. Br J Gen Pract 2005; 55: 776–82
  • Swithinbank LV, Abrams P. The impact of urinary incontinence on the quality of life of women. World J Urol 1999; 17: 225–9
  • Fultz NH, Herzog AR. Self-Reported social end emotional impact of urinary incontinence. J Am Geriatr Soc 2001; 49: 892–9
  • Andersson G, Johansson J, Garpenholt O, Nilsson K. Urinary incontinence: Prevalence, impact on daily living and desire for treatment. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2004; 38: 125–30
  • Berzon R, Hays RD, Shumaker SA. International use, application and performance of health-related quality of life instruments. Qual Life Res 1993; 2: 367–8
  • Simeonova Z, Milson I, Kullendorff A-M, Molander U, Bengtsson C. The prevalence of urinary incontinence and its influence on the quality of life in women from an urban Swedisch population. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1999; 78: 546–51
  • Moller LA, Lose G, Jorgensen T. The prevalence and bothersomeness of lower urinary tract symptoms in women 40–60 years of age. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2000; 79: 298–305
  • Teunissen D, Lagro-Janssen T. Urinary incontinence in community dwelling elderly: Are there sex differences in help-seeking behaviour?. Scand J Prim Health Care 2004; 22: 209–16
  • Van Weel C, Smith H, Beasley JW. Family practice research networks. Experiences from 3 countries. J Fam Pract 2000; 49: 938–43
  • Lagro-Janssen ALM, Breedveldt Boer HP, van Dongen JJ, Lemain T, et al. NHG-standaard: incontinentie voor urine [Dutch College Guidelines on Urinary Incontinence]. Huisarts Wet 1995; 38: 71–80
  • Lagro-Janssen ALM, Debruyne FMJ, van Weel C. Value of patient's case history in diagnosing urinary incontinence in general practice. Br J Urology 1991; 76: 569–72
  • Vierhout ME. Measurement of undesirable urine loss in women. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1990; 134: 1837–9
  • Shumaker SA, Wyman JF, Uebersax JS, McClish D, Fantl JA. Health-related quality of life measures for women with urinary incontinence: the incontinence impact questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory. Qual Life Res 1994; 3: 291–306
  • Harvey M, Kristjansson B, Griffith D, Versi E. The Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory: A revisit of their validity in women without a urodynamic diagnosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 185: 25–31
  • Hagen S, Hanley J, Capewell A. Test/retest reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change of the Urogenital Distress Inventory and the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire. Neurourol Urodynam 2002; 21: 534–9
  • Handa V, Massof RW. Measuring the severity of stress urinary incontinence using the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire. Neurourol Urodynam 2004; 23: 27–32
  • Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA 1990
  • Mitteness L. Social aspects of urinary incontinence in the elderly. AORN J 1992; 56: 731
  • Dowd TT. Discovering older women's experiences of urinary incontinence. Res Nursing Health 1991; 14: 179–86
  • Vaart van der CH, Leeuw de JRJ, Roovers JPWR, Heintz APM. The effect of coping strategies on health-related quality of life in women with symptoms of pelvic floor dysfunction: Pelvic floor dysfunction and quality of life in women. Dissertation, Utrecht 2001.
  • Hovanitz CA, Kozora E. Life stress and clinically elevated MMPI scales: Gender differences in the moderating influence of coping. J Clin Psychol 1989; 45: 766–77
  • Corney RH. Sex differences in general practice attendance and help seeking for minor illness. Psychosom Res 1990; 34: 525–34
  • Johnson TM II, Kincade JE, Bernard SL, Busby-Whitehead J, de Friese GH. Incontinence: Results from the national follow-up survey on self-care and aging. J Am Geriatr Soc 2000; 48: 894–902
  • Nuotio M, Jylha M, Luukkaala T, Tammela TLJ. Urinary incontinence in a Finnish population aged 70 and over. Scand J Prim Health Care 2003; 21: 182–7
  • Dugan E, Cohen S, Robinson D, et al. The quality of life of older adults with urinary incontinence: Determining generic and condition-specific predictors. Qual Life Res 1998; 7: 337–44
  • Ouslander JG, Abelson S. Perception of urinary incontinence among elderly outpatients. Gerontologist 1990; 23: 1–10
  • Vaart van der, Leeuw de JR, Roovers JP, Heintz AP. The influence of urinary incontinence on quality of life of community-dwelling, 45–70 year old Dutch women. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2000; 144: 894–7
  • Lagro-Janssen AL, Smits AJA, Weel van C. Women with urinary incontinence: Self-perceived worries and practitioners’ knowledge of problem. Br J Gen Pract 1990; 38: 292–5

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.