483
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Editorial

Editorial statement

, , &

Globally, local governments are struggling to tackle complex ‘wicked issues’, with increasing disenchantment and disengagement from traditional structures of representative democracy. Competing interests, frames and opportunities, as well as conflicting expert-knowledge, and the global dimension of many local issues, make the task of mayors, town councils, local experts, participating citizens, and service delivery organisations ever more complex. In addition, in many countries, continued pressure on government budgets means growing service demands have to be met with constrained resources. These trends are leading to a continued emphasis on innovation in: service delivery, administration and contracting-out (Bel, Brown, and Marques Citation2013); results-based management and procurement (Bovaird, Briggs, and Willis Citation2014); partnership and collaborative working (Coleman et al. Citation2014); institutional reform and mergers (Drew, Kortt, and Dollery Citation2016); and democracy, community engagement, empowerment and service co-production (Rolfe Citation2016). In addition, developments in e-governance and participation provide future challenges and opportunities for local governments and communities. These challenges, many of which continue from the previous editorial statement (Durose and Richardson Citation2014​), remain present and are in need of academic investigation and possibly solutions. Local Government Studies provides a leading, international outlet for insights into these challenges and possibly solutions for practitioners.

Historically, with its roots in the Institute of Local Government at the University of Birmingham, Local Government Studies has produced high quality research on UK local government. The journal continues to reflect on the challenges to UK local government through high-quality submissions, such as our recent symposium on austerity (Bailey, Bramley, and Hastings Citation2015) and commentary from Lowndes and Gardner on the most recent rounds of reform, including the City Deals and ‘Northern Powerhouse’ policies in Northern England (Lowndes and Gardner Citation2016). The journal’s international scope continues to increase, with scholars from Continental Europe, North America, South America, Asia and Africa increasingly joining the journal community.

A key challenge is maintaining a relevance to practice in local government, while the pressures on academic authors do not necessarily facilitate this. We maintain our commitment to empirical research about, and informing, practice as exemplified by the winner of the 2016 John Stewart prize for best paper Regenerating the City: People, Politics, Power and the Public Sphere (Bunyan Citation2015​). Through our partnership with INLOGOV, we are developing further channels to reach out to practitioners through blog posts supported by social media. This is supported by appointments to the Editorial Team and Editorial Board.

As an editorial team, we welcome this increasing diversity. As Alan Cochrane in his famous 1996 book Whatever Happened to Local Government stated in relation to the UK, we also believe

‘that local government – or, more accurately, local politics – matters and that what happens at local level cannot (and should not) be left as a secondary and marginal aspect of the British political system. On the contrary, not only (paradoxically) are local politics becoming more and more important, despite the decline in direct service responsibilities held by local authorities, but also local forms of political accommodation between key social groups are pointing to new styles of political practice which are of much wider significance.’

(Cochrane Citation1993, 5)

While the vote for the UK to leave the EU has focused British national politics on the supra-national, we believe Cochrane’s comments are as valid today as they were almost 25 years ago. So Local Government Studies will continue to be a diverse interdisciplinary journal, covering political science, public administration and management, governance, policy analysis, urban studies, planning and social policy. It will use international, high-quality research to reveal what the ‘local’ tells us about the ‘global’, and it will also advocate for the continued existence of a local government under increasing threat across the globe.

This editorial statement has been written with Local Government Studies continuing to strengthen as a leading international journal in political science, public administration and planning studies. As a new editorial team, we are taking this opportunity to restate the aims and scope of the journal and consolidate. Now well into its fourth decade in publication, Local Government Studies continues to grow in importance as one of the leading journals on the politics and management of local and sub-regional government across the globe. This is in no small part due to the hard work of the previous editors, and we would like to take this opportunity to thank them publicly.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.​

References

  • Bailey, N., G. Bramley, A. Hastings. 2015. “Symposium Introduction: Local Responses to “Austerity”.” Local Government Studies 41 (4): 571–581. ​
  • Bel, G., T. Brown, R. C. Marques. 2013. “Public-Private Partnerships: Infrastructure, Transportation Local Services.” Local Government Studies 39 (3): 303–311. doi:10.1080/03003930.2013.775125.
  • Bovaird, T., I. Briggs, M. Willis. 2014. “Strategic Commissioning in the UK: Service Improvement Cycle or Just Going Round in Circles?” Local Government Studies 40 (4): 533–559. doi:10.1080/03003930.2013.805689.
  • Bunyan, P. 2015. “Regenerating the City: People, Politics, Power the Public Sphere.” Local Government Studies 41 (3): 362–378. doi:10.1080/03003930.2014.982109.
  • Cochrane, A. 1993. Whatever Happened to Local Government? Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • Coleman, A., K. Checkl, J. Segar, I. McDermott, S. Harrison, S. Peckham. 2014. “Joining It Up? Health Wellbeing Boards in English Local Governance: Evidence from Clinical Commissioning Groups Shadow Health Wellbeing Boards.” Local Government Studies 40 (4): 560–580. doi:10.1080/03003930.2013.841578.
  • Drew, J., M. A. Kortt, B. Dollery. 2016. “Did the Big Stick Work? an Empirical Assessment of Scale Economies the Queensl Forced Amalgamation Program.” Local Government Studies 42 (1): 1–14. doi:10.1080/03003930.2013.874341.
  • Durose, C., L. Richardson. 2014. “Editorial.” Local Government Studies 40 (3): 337–338.
  • Lowndes, V., A. Gardner. 2016. “Local Governance under the Conservatives: Super-Austerity, Devolution the “Smarter State”.” Local Government Studies 42 (3): 357–375. doi:10.1080/03003930.2016.1150837.
  • Rolfe, S. 2016. “Divergence in Community Participation Policy: Analysing Localism Community Empowerment Using a Theory of Change Approach.” Local Government Studies 42 (1): 97–118. doi:10.1080/03003930.2015.1081848.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.