Abstract
This paper studies urban transport, a public service with extensive initiatives towards deregulation and privatisation throughout the European Union and in other developed and developing countries. The relative merits of deregulation, public or private provision and the implications of different policies for the performance of public services have become important issues. A crucial question is what type of operating and regulatory environment is best suited to stimulate efficiency in public service delivery. This paper analyses specifically the effect of privatisation and deregulation on the technical efficiency of bus services in 73 cities, in order to compare performance in cities with bus services provided by public operators, private operators, both types simultaneously or in which the service is deregulated. The behaviour of the different types of operators analysed in this paper shows that competition – total or partial – is effective in controlling costs.
Notes
1 For example, in October 1998 I tabled Sale of One-third of Telstra, Audit Report No.10 (1998–1999). The audit concluded that, as an essential element of the outsourcing of project management for future Commonwealth public share offers, overall value for money could be improved by giving greater emphasis to financial issues when tendering for advisers; encouraging more competitive pressure on selling commissions and fees; paying fees only for services actually provided; and instituting a more effective and commercial approach to administering payment for shares by investors.
4 Defined as: ‘Total annual investment spending (depreciation) on public transport, excluding direct operating expenses’. This indicator has been used by: Hanusch and Cantner (Citation1991), Filipini et al. (Citation1992), Fazioli et al. (Citation1993), Levaggi (Citation1994), and Loizides and Giahalis (Citation1995).
5 Defined as the total annual number of kilometres travelled by every bus vehicle on revenue service runs in the city. This indicator has been used by: Miller (Citation1970), Fielding et al. (Citation1985), Viton (Citation1986, Citation1992, Citation1993), Tone and Sawada (Citation1990), Chang and Kao (Citation1992), Obeng (Citation1994), Wunsch (Citation1994), Sakano and Obeng (Citation1995), Kerstens (Citation1996, Citation1999), Nolan (Citation1996), Costa and Markellos (Citation1997), Sokano et al. (Citation1997), Matas and Raymond (Citation1998), Viton (Citation1998), Button and Costa (Citation1999).
6 Defined as the total number of annual bus urban transport revenue seat-kilometres (only sitting places are counted). This indicator has been used by: Nollet et al. (Citation1988), Gathon (Citation1989), Hanusch and Cantner (Citation1991), Thiry and Tulkens (Citation1992), Filipini et al. (Citation1992), Tulkens (Citation1993), Fazioli et al. (Citation1993), Levaggi (Citation1994), Tulkens and Wunsch (Citation1994), Wunsch (Citation1994), Tulkens and Vanden (Citation1995), Kerstens (Citation1996, Citation1999), and Button and Costa (Citation1999).
7 Defined as the total annual bus urban transport boarding (unlinked trips) in the city. This indicator has been used by: Levaggi, 1994.
9 Defined as the average 24-hour, 7-day bus urban transport commercial operating speed. This indicator has been used by: Levaggi (Citation1994) and Nolan (Citation1996).
10 Defined as the number of employed people at the place of work and not the labour force.
Cervero
,
R.
1983
.
Cost and performance effects of transit operating subsidies in the United States
.
International Journal of Transport Economics
,
10
(
3
)
:
534
–
562
.
Tone
,
K.
and
Sawada
,
T.
1990
.
“
An efficiency analysis of public vs. private bus transportation enterprises
”
. In
Operational Research 90
,
Edited by:
Bradley
,
H.
357
–
365
.
New York
:
Pergamon
.
Chu
,
X.
,
Fielding
,
G.
and
Lamar
,
B.
1992
.
Measuring transit performance using data envelopment analysis
.
Transportation Research
,
26A
:
223
–
230
.
Wunsch
,
P.
1994
.
Costing Busses: Back to the Basics, Brussels, FUSL
,
SMASH Cahier 9405
.
Talley
,
W. K.
and
Becker
,
A. J.
1982
.
A single measure for evaluating public transit systems
.
Transport Quarterly
,
36
:
423
–
431
.
Nash
,
C. A.
1980
.
Management objectives, fares and service levels in bus transport
.
Journal of Transport Economic Policy
,
12
:
70
–
85
.
Patton
,
T. A.
1983
.
Transit performance indicators, staff study (SS-67–0.3–0.1), US Dpt. of Transportation
,
Cambridge
:
Transportation System Centre
.
Fielding
,
G. J.
,
Babistky
,
T.
and
Brenner
,
M.
1985
.
Performance evaluation for bus transit
.
Transportation Research Part A
,
19
:
73
–
82
.
Chang
,
K. P.
and
Kao
,
P. H.
1992
.
The relative efficiency of public versus private municipal bus firms: an application of data envelopment analysis
.
Journal of Productivity Analysis
,
3
:
67
–
84
.
Levaggi
,
R.
1994
.
Parametric and non-parametric approach to efficiency: the case of urban transport in Italy
.
Studi Economici
,
49
:
67
–
88
.
Sakano
,
R.
and
Obeng
,
K.
1995
.
Re-examination of inefficiencies in urban transit systems: a stochastic frontier approach
.
Logistic and Transportation Review
,
31
:
377
–
392
.
Kerstens
,
K.
1996
.
Technical efficiency measurement and explanation of French urban transit companies
.
Transportation Research, Part A
,
30
:
431
–
452
.
Kerstens
,
K.
1999
.
Decomposing technical efficiency and effectiveness of French urban transport
.
Annales d'Économie et de Statistique
,
54
:
129
–
155
.
Nolan
,
J. F.
1996
.
Determinants of productive efficiency in urban transit
.
Logistics and Transportation Review
,
32
(
3
)
:
319
–
342
.
Sakano
,
R.
,
Obeng
,
K.
and
Azam
,
G.
1997
.
Subsidies and inefficiency: stochastic frontier approach
.
Contemporary Economic Policy
,
15
:
113
–
127
.
Costa
,
A.
1998
.
“
Public transport efficiency and effectiveness: Metro de Madrid
”
. In
Transport Networks in Europe: Concepts, Analysis and Policies
,
Edited by:
Button
,
K.
,
Nijkamp
,
P.
and
Priemus
,
H.
248
–
264
.
Cheltenham
:
Elgar
.
Pina
,
V.
and
Torres
,
L.
2001
.
Analysis of the efficiency of local governments services delivery. An application to urban public transport
.
Transportation Research Part A
,
35
(
10
)
:
929
–
944
.
Hanusch
,
H.
and
Cantner
,
U.
1991
.
Produktion öffentlicher leistungen: Effizienz und technischer fortschritt
.
Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik
,
208
:
369
–
384
.
Filippini
,
M.
,
Maggi
,
R.
and
Priono
,
P.
1992
.
Inefficiency in a regulated industry: the case of Swiss regional bus companies
.
Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics
,
63
:
437
–
455
.
Fazioli
,
R.
,
Filippini
,
M.
and
Prioni
,
P.
1993
.
Cost-structure and efficiency of local public transport: the case of Emilia Romagna bus companies
.
International Journal of Transport Economics
,
20
:
305
–
324
.
Levaggi
,
R.
1994
.
Parametric and non-parametric approach to efficiency: the case of urban transport in Italy
.
Studi Economici
,
49
:
67
–
88
.
Loizides
,
I.
and
Giahalis
,
B.
1995
.
The performance of public enterprises: a case of the Greek railway organization
.
International Journal of Transport Economics
,
22
:
283
–
306
.
Miller
,
D. R.
1970
.
Differences among cities, differences among firms, and costs of urban bus transport
.
Journal of Industrial Economics
,
19
(
1
)
:
22
–
32
.
Fielding
,
G. J.
,
Babistky
,
T.
and
Brenner
,
M.
1985
.
Performance evaluation for bus transit
.
Transportation Research Part A
,
19
:
73
–
82
.
Viton
,
P.
1986
.
The question of efficiency in urban bus transportation
.
Journal of Regional Science
,
26
:
499
–
513
.
Viton
,
P.
1992
.
Consolidations of scale and scope in urban transit
.
Regional Science and Urban Economics
,
22
:
25
–
49
.
Viton
,
P.
1993
.
How big should transit be? Evidence from the San Francisco bay area
.
Transportation
,
20
:
35
–
57
.
Tone
,
K.
and
Sawada
,
T.
1990
.
“
An efficiency analysis of public vs. private bus transportation enterprises
”
. In
Operational Research 90
,
Edited by:
Bradley
,
H.
357
–
365
.
New York
:
Pergamon
.
Chang
,
K. P.
and
Kao
,
P. H.
1992
.
The relative efficiency of public versus private municipal bus firms: an application of data envelopment analysis
.
Journal of Productivity Analysis
,
3
:
67
–
84
.
Obeng
,
K.
1994
.
The economic cost of subsidy-induced technical inefficiency
.
International Journal of Transport Economics
,
21
:
3
–
20
.
Wunsch
,
P.
1994
.
Costing Busses: Back to the Basics, Brussels, FUSL
,
SMASH Cahier 9405
.
Sakano
,
R.
and
Obeng
,
K.
1995
.
Re-examination of inefficiencies in urban transit systems: a stochastic frontier approach
.
Logistic and Transportation Review
,
31
:
377
–
392
.
Kerstens
,
K.
1996
.
Technical efficiency measurement and explanation of French urban transit companies
.
Transportation Research, Part A
,
30
:
431
–
452
.
Kerstens
,
K.
1999
.
Decomposing technical efficiency and effectiveness of French urban transport
.
Annales d'Économie et de Statistique
,
54
:
129
–
155
.
Nolan
,
J. F.
1996
.
Determinants of productive efficiency in urban transit
.
Logistics and Transportation Review
,
32
(
3
)
:
319
–
342
.
Costa
,
A.
and
Markellos
,
R. N.
1997
.
Evaluating public transport efficiency with neural network models
.
Transportation Research, Part C
,
5
(
5
)
:
301
–
312
.
Sakano
,
R.
,
Obeng
,
K.
and
Azam
,
G.
1997
.
Subsidies and inefficiency: stochastic frontier approach
.
Contemporary Economic Policy
,
15
:
113
–
127
.
Matas
,
A.
and
Raymond
,
J. L.
1998
.
Technical characteristics and efficiency of urban bus companies: the case of Spain
.
Transportation
,
25
:
243
–
263
.
Viton
,
P.
1998
.
Changes in multimode bus transit efficiency, 1988–1992
.
Transportation
,
25
:
1
–
21
.
Button
,
K.
and
Costa
,
A.
1999
.
Economic efficiency gains from urban public transport regulatory reform: two case studies of changes in Europe
.
Annals of Regional Science
,
33
:
425
–
438
.
Nollet
,
C.
,
Thiry
,
B.
and
Tulkens
,
H.
1988
.
“
Mesure de l'efficacité productive: application a la société de transports intercommunaux de Bruxelles
”
. In
LaPerformance Economique des Sociétés Belges de Transport Urbains
,
Edited by:
Thirty
,
B.
and
Tulkens
,
H.
137
–
170
.
Charlerloi
:
CIRIEC
.
Gathon
,
H. J.
1989
.
Indicators of partial productivity and technical efficiency in the European urban transit sector
.
Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics
,
60
(
1
)
:
43
–
59
.
Hanusch
,
H.
and
Cantner
,
U.
1991
.
Produktion öffentlicher leistungen: Effizienz und technischer fortschritt
.
Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik
,
208
:
369
–
384
.
Thiry
,
B.
and
Tulkens
,
H.
1992
.
Allowing for inefficiency in parametric estimation of production functions for urban transit firms
.
Journal of Productivity Analysis
,
3
:
45
–
65
.
Filippini
,
M.
,
Maggi
,
R.
and
Priono
,
P.
1992
.
Inefficiency in a regulated industry: the case of Swiss regional bus companies
.
Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics
,
63
:
437
–
455
.
Tulkens
,
H.
1993
.
On FEH efficiency analysis: some methodological issues and applications to retail banking, courts, and urban transit
.
Journal of Productivity Analysis
,
4
:
183
–
210
.
Fazioli
,
R.
,
Filippini
,
M.
and
Prioni
,
P.
1993
.
Cost-structure and efficiency of local public transport: the case of Emilia Romagna bus companies
.
International Journal of Transport Economics
,
20
:
305
–
324
.
Levaggi
,
R.
1994
.
Parametric and non-parametric approach to efficiency: the case of urban transport in Italy
.
Studi Economici
,
49
:
67
–
88
.
Tulkens
,
H.
and
Wunsch
,
P.
1994
.
Les performance économiques de la STIB au mois le mois
.
Revue Suisse d'Économie Politique et de Statistique
,
130
:
627
–
646
.
Wunsch
,
P.
1994
.
Costing Busses: Back to the Basics, Brussels, FUSL
,
SMASH Cahier 9405
.
Tulkens
,
H.
and
Vanden
,
Eeckaut P.
1995
.
Non-frontier measures of efficiency, progress and regress for time series data
.
International Journal of Production Economics
,
39
:
83
–
97
.
Kerstens
,
K.
1996
.
Technical efficiency measurement and explanation of French urban transit companies
.
Transportation Research, Part A
,
30
:
431
–
452
.
Kerstens
,
K.
1999
.
Decomposing technical efficiency and effectiveness of French urban transport
.
Annales d'Économie et de Statistique
,
54
:
129
–
155
.
Button
,
K.
and
Costa
,
A.
1999
.
Economic efficiency gains from urban public transport regulatory reform: two case studies of changes in Europe
.
Annals of Regional Science
,
33
:
425
–
438
.
Hensher
,
D. A.
and
Daniels
,
R.
1995
.
Productivity measurement in the urban bus sector
.
Transport Policy
,
2
(
3
)
:
179
–
194
.
Cervero
,
R.
1983
.
Cost and performance effects of transit operating subsidies in the United States
.
International Journal of Transport Economics
,
10
(
3
)
:
534
–
562
.
Fielding
,
G. J.
,
Babistky
,
T.
and
Brenner
,
M.
1985
.
Performance evaluation for bus transit
.
Transportation Research Part A
,
19
:
73
–
82
.
Levaggi
,
R.
1994
.
Parametric and non-parametric approach to efficiency: the case of urban transport in Italy
.
Studi Economici
,
49
:
67
–
88
.
Bhattacharyya
,
A.
,
Kumbhakar
,
S.
and
Bhattacharyya
,
A.
1995
.
Ownership structure and cost efficiency: a study of publicly owned passenger-bus transportation companies in India
.
Journal of Productivity Analysis
,
6
:
47
–
61
.
Loizides
,
I.
and
Giahalis
,
B.
1995
.
The performance of public enterprises: a case of the Greek railway organization
.
International Journal of Transport Economics
,
22
:
283
–
306
.
Kerstens
,
K.
1996
.
Technical efficiency measurement and explanation of French urban transit companies
.
Transportation Research, Part A
,
30
:
431
–
452
.
Kerstens
,
K.
1999
.
Decomposing technical efficiency and effectiveness of French urban transport
.
Annales d'Économie et de Statistique
,
54
:
129
–
155
.
Kumbhakar
,
S.
and
Bhattacharyya
,
A.
1996
.
Productivity growth in passenger-bus transportation: a heteroskedastic error component model with unbalanced panel data
.
Empirical Economics
,
21
:
557
–
573
.
Lijesen
,
M.
1998
.
“
Analyzing cost structures of public sector activities, with an application to regional public transport
”
. In
Performance Budgetting: A Perspective on Modeling and Strategic Planning in the Public Sector in Holland
,
Edited by:
de Graan
,
G. B.K.
and
Volmer
,
F. G.
178
–
187
.
Delft
:
Eburon
.
De Jong
,
G.
and
Cheung
,
F.
1999
.
“
Stochastic frontier models for public transport
”
. In
World Transport Research: Selected Proceedings of the 8th World Conference on Transport Research, Vol.1: Transport Modes and Systems
,
Edited by:
Meersman
,
H.
,
Van De Voorde
,
E.
and
Winkelmans
,
W.
373
–
386
.
New York
:
Pergamon
.
Levaggi
,
R.
1994
.
Parametric and non-parametric approach to efficiency: the case of urban transport in Italy
.
Studi Economici
,
49
:
67
–
88
.
Nolan
,
J. F.
1996
.
Determinants of productive efficiency in urban transit
.
Logistics and Transportation Review
,
32
(
3
)
:
319
–
342
.