2,262
Views
29
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Shared‐reading versus oral storytelling: associations with preschoolers’ prosocial skills and problem behaviours

&
Pages 123-146 | Received 12 Jun 2009, Accepted 28 Aug 2009, Published online: 17 Nov 2009
 

Abstract

Dyadic shared‐reading and oral storytelling practices and their association to American preschoolers’ (N = 33) prosocial and problem behaviour was examined. The frequency (how often dyads read) and history (the child’s age at first reading) were examined within shared‐reading; emotion state talk and evaluative judgments were examined in both shared‐reading and oral storytelling. Results revealed mothers used more positive emotion talk during shared‐reading, but more negative emotion talk during oral storytelling. Mother–son dyads used more evaluative judgments during oral storytelling compared to shared‐reading and compared to mother–daughter pairs in both contexts. Shared‐reading practices were associated with prosocial skills, but this result was nonsignificant after including covariates. On the contrary, even after covarying literacy and language skills, there was a significant negative correlation between positive emotion state talk during oral storytelling and problem behaviour. Qualitative examples are included. Theoretical implications for differences between shared‐reading versus storytelling and practical implications for the design of narrative interventions are discussed.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the families who participated in this study and to Nadia Flanigan, Marion Johnson and Katie Roberson who helped with data collection and coding.

Notes

1. Our initial coding included volition and cognitive internal state terms as well, but these terms were not associated with the outcomes in the study. Given that a large body of prior research has examined the relationship between emotion state terms and children’s social development, we decided to only include emotion terms to follow the current line of evidence in the field.

2. These examples have been edited for clarity by taking out redundant utterances, unintelligible comments and irrelevant remarks that are not related to the story.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 767.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.