842
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Cardiovascular

Adherence to statin treatment: an important issue in clinical practice

, &
Pages 1639-1640 | Received 07 Jun 2016, Accepted 23 Jun 2016, Published online: 07 Jul 2016

Introduction

In this issue of the journal Cicero et al.Citation1 describe several options to lower plasma low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels in patients who were intolerant to statins due to myalgia but were taking ezetimibe. Indeed we need several options to try to resolve this key issue. In this editorial we will briefly consider four issues related to adherence to statin treatment. (1) Extent of the problem. (2) Does discontinuation matter? (3) Why do patients discontinue statins? (4) How to address discontinuation.

Extent of the problem

Establishing exact figures for statin adherence is difficult because of differences in study design. For example, was adherence assessed as pill counts, proportion of days covered (PDC), medication possession ratio (MPR: percentage of days when medication was available) or gap between filled prescriptions? Were more advanced measures used (electronic tablet or container)? What was the duration of monitoring adherence? Patient characteristics may also matter. Furthermore, run-in phases in trials may have excluded those intolerant to statins and intensive follow-up during a study may favourably affect adherence. Older studies may also have different motivational factors (positive or negative) for prescribers and patients. This may include information from guidelines and adverse publicity about side effectsCitation2. Even the definition of statin intolerance is not uniformCitation3!

Despite the limitations mentioned above, some studies have attempted to assess adherence to statin therapy. It is beyond the remit of this editorial to consider all these studies. We briefly consider the most recent one we identified. In a Finnish registers studyCitation4 (97,575 new statin users; age 45–75 years in 2001 to 2004 with no cardiovascular [CV] diseases at baseline), 53% displayed good (PDC ≥80%), 26% intermediate (PDC 40–79%) and 21% poor (PDC <40%) adherence during the first year of follow up. Therefore, only about 50% of the patients had good adherence at 1 year; a further deterioration with time may be expected. Statin adherence has also been considered elsewhereCitation3.

Does discontinuation matter?

In the Finnish registers described aboveCitation4, there was a 25% relative risk reduction (hazard ratio [HR] 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71–0.79) in the rate of any CV event or death among good vs. poor adherers after adjustments. There is even evidence of a dose–response relationship between adherence level and the risk of ischemic stroke (relative risk [RR] 0.63, 95% CI 0.53–0.75) for PDC ≥80% vs. PDC <20%, p for trend <0.0001)Citation5. In a national cohort study (423,786 individuals; Korean National Health Insurance Claims Database)Citation6 non-adherence to statins was associated with an increased risk of CV hospitalization (HR 2.18, 95% CI: 2.02–2.35) and all-cause mortality (HR 1.75, 95% CI: 1.66–1.84). In a Kaiser Permanente Georgia members studyCitation7 including patients (n = 1066) with a history of coronary heart disease or risk equivalent(s), after multivariable adjustment, and compared with those with high adherence, the risk ratios for not achieving a ≥30% LDL-C reduction were 1.31 (95% CI 1.13–1.52) and 1.88 (95% CI 1.67–2.11) for participants with intermediate and low adherence, respectively (p < 0.01). It follows that non-adherence not only increases the risk of CV events but also decreases the probability of achieving LDL-C targets.

Why do patients discontinue statins?

Many factors have been shown to influence statin discontinuation. Among these are real or perceived adverse effects or lack of efficacy, patient preference (rather than provider preference) and motivation, cost, polypharmacy or complex drug regimes, drug interactions, age, ethnicity, type of exercise and its intensity, gender, presence of kidney or liver disease, adverse publicity in the media and even use of generic tabletsCitation2,Citation3,Citation8–11. The key issue is for prescribers to identify any factors affecting adherence and then address them. Statin intolerance has some scientific basis because links with genetic patterns have been reportedCitation12. Also, elevated creatine kinase (CK) activity has been associated with statin-related myositisCitation3.

How to address discontinuation

The points raised above, the Cicero et al.Citation1 study and expert statementsCitation3,Citation13 provide suggestions regarding dealing with statin discontinuation. In this “battle for adherence”, pharmacists, nurses and the “poly pill” (or drug combination tablets; e.g. statin + ezetimibe) may prove usefulCitation14,Citation15. Regular follow-up visits, auto-reminders and refill reminders may also help. Excluding hypothyroidism and drug interactions is relevantCitation3. Whether correcting vitamin D deficiencyCitation16 or administering coenzyme Q10 supplementsCitation17 is helpful remains to be established. However, it is of interest that statin administration is associated with a fall in circulating coenzyme Q10 levelsCitation18. For patients unable to tolerate any statin, ezetimibe, a proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor or a combination of both would be alternative options. Cost may limit this option to high risk patients. A more extensive review of this topic has been recently publishedCitation19.

Conclusions

Ensuring good adherence to statins is currently a major clinical problem with consequences in terms of vascular events. Several factors contribute to this situation and they need to be identified and then addressed.

Transparency

Declaration of funding

This editorial was not funded. It was written independently; no company or institution supported the authors financially or by providing a professional writer.

Declaration of financial/other relationships

V.G.A. has disclosed that he has given talks, attended conferences and participated in trials sponsored by MSD, Sanofi, and Amgen. D.P.M. has disclosed that he has given talks and attended conferences sponsored by MSD, AstraZeneca and Libytec. N.K. has disclosed that she has given talks, attended conferences and participated in trials sponsored by for MSD, Novartis, Amgen, Sanofi, Novo Nordisk and Libytec.

The CMRO peer reviewer on this manuscript has no relevant financial or other relationships to disclose.

References

  • Cicero AFG, Morbini M, Bove M, et al. Additional therapy for cholesterol lowering in ezetimibe-treated, statin-intolerant patients in clinical practice: results from an internal audit of a university lipid clinic. Curr Med Res Opin 2016. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2016.1190326
  • Kaya H, Beton O, Yilmaz MB. How to increase level of patients’ awareness regarding the importance of statins despite the influence of the media? Int J Cardiol 2016;207:164
  • Banach M, Rizzo M, Toth PP, et al. Statin intolerance – an attempt at a unified definition. Position paper from an International Lipid Expert Panel. Arch Med Sci 2015;11:1-23
  • Rannanheimo PK, Tiittanen P, Hartikainen J, et al. Impact of statin adherence on cardiovascular morbidity and all-cause mortality in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a population-based cohort study in Finland. Value Health 2015;18:896-905
  • Korhonen MJ, Ruokoniemi P, Ilomäki J, et al. Adherence to statin therapy and the incidence of ischemic stroke in patients with diabetes. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2016;25:161-9
  • Shin S, Jang S, Lee TJ, Kim H. Association between non-adherence to statin and hospitalization for cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality in a national cohort. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 2014;52:948-56
  • Vupputuri S, Joski PJ, Kilpatrick R, et al. LDL cholesterol response and statin adherence among high-risk patients initiating treatment. Am J Manag Care 2016;22:e106-15
  • Peng JA, Ancock BP, Conell C, et al. Nonutilization of statins in a community-based population with a history of coronary revascularization. Clin Ther 2016;38:288-96.e2
  • Wei MY, Ito MK, Cohen JD, et al. Predictors of statin adherence, switching, and discontinuation in the USAGE survey: understanding the use of statins in America and gaps in patient education. J Clin Lipidol 2013;7:472-83
  • Kesselheim AS, Bykov K, Avorn J, et al. Burden of changes in pill appearance for patients receiving generic cardiovascular medications after myocardial infarction: cohort and nested case–control studies. Ann Intern Med 2014;161:96-103
  • Lewey J, Shrank WH, Bowry AD, et al. Gender and racial disparities in adherence to statin therapy: a meta-analysis. Am Heart J 2013;165:665-78, 678.e1
  • Li JH, Joy SV, Haga SB, et al. Genetically guided statin therapy on statin perceptions, adherence, and cholesterol lowering: a pilot implementation study in primary care patients. J Pers Med 2014;4:147-62
  • Stroes ES, Thompson PD, Corsini A, et al. Statin-associated muscle symptoms: impact on statin therapy – European atherosclerosis society consensus panel statement on assessment, aetiology and management. Eur Heart J 2015;36:1012-22
  • Hinds A, Lopez D, Rascati K, et al. Adherence to the 2013 blood cholesterol guidelines in patients with diabetes at a PCMH: comparison of physician only and combination physician/pharmacist visits. Diabetes Educ 2016;42:228-33
  • Webster R, Patel A, Selak V, et al. SPACE Collaboration. Effectiveness of fixed dose combination medication (“polypills”) compared with usual care in patients with cardiovascular disease or at high risk: a prospective, individual patient data meta-analysis of 3140 patients in six countries. Int J Cardiol 2016;205:147-56
  • Michalska-Kasiczak M, Sahebkar A, Mikhailidis DP, et al. Lipid and Blood Pressure Meta-analysis Collaboration (LBPMC) Group. Analysis of vitamin D levels in patients with and without statin-associated myalgia – a systematic review and meta-analysis of 7 studies with 2420 patients. Int J Cardiol 2015;178:111-16
  • Banach M, Serban C, Sahebkar A, et al. Lipid and Blood Pressure Meta-analysis Collaboration Group. Effects of coenzyme Q10 on statin-induced myopathy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Mayo Clin Proc 2015;90:24-34
  • Banach M, Serban C, Ursoniu S, et al. Lipid and Blood Pressure Meta-analysis Collaboration (LBPMC) Group. Statin therapy and plasma coenzyme Q10 concentrations – a systematic review and meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials. Pharmacol Res 2015;99:329-36
  • Laufs U, Scharnagl H, Halle M, et al. Treatment options for statin-associated muscle symptoms. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2015;112:748-55

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.