Abstract
Objectives: Multiple real-world studies have reported potential cost savings associated with second-generation antipsychotic long-acting injectable therapies (SGA-LAIs), including once monthly paliperidone palmitate (PP1M). Yet, only about 12% of Medicaid patients with schizophrenia initiate SGA-LAIs, with poor adherence contributing to frequent relapse among patients on oral atypical antipsychotics (OAAs). The objective of this study was to project the economic impact when an incremental proportion of non-adherent patients with a recent relapse switched from OAAs to PP1M.
Methods: A 12 month decision-tree model was developed from a Medicaid payers’ perspective. The target population was non-adherent OAA patients with a recent relapse. At equal adherence, risk of relapse was equal between PP1M and OAAs, and OAA patients remained non-adherent until treatment switch. Outcomes included number of relapses, relapse costs and pharmacy costs.
Results: Based on a hypothetical health plan of 1 million members, 3037 schizophrenia patients were non-adherent on OAAs with a recent relapse. Compared to continuing OAAs, switching 5% of patients (n = 152) to PP1M resulted in net schizophrenia-related cost savings of $674,975 at a plan level, $4445 per patient switched per year and $0.0562 per member per month, with a total of 92 avoided relapses over 12 months. Total annual plan level schizophrenia-related costs were $114.1 M when all patients switched to PP1M before any subsequent relapse (n = 3037), $123.4 M when patients switched to PP1M after a first subsequent relapse (n = 2631), and $127.6 M when all patients continued OAAs. Switching all patients to PP1M before any subsequent relapse averted 917 relapses, at a lower cost per patient switched ($37,559) compared to switching after a first subsequent relapse ($45,089) or continuing OAAs ($42,005).
Conclusion: Over 12 months, pharmacy costs associated with switching patients from OAAs to PP1M were offset by reduced relapse rates and schizophrenia-related healthcare expenditures, with earlier use of PP1M projected to generate greater cost savings.
Transparency
Declaration of funding
This research was funded by Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC.
Author contributions: Analyses were carried out by L.M., D.P., N.S., M.V.L. and P.L.. All authors participated in the conception and design of the study and the interpretation of data, and all approve the final manuscript for publication.
Declaration of financial/other relationships
D.P., L.M., M.V.L., P.L. and N.S. have disclosed that they are employees of Analysis Group Inc., a consulting company that has received research grants from Janssen Scientific Affairs LLC to conduct this study. A.C.K., E.K. and T.B.A. have disclosed that they are employees of Janssen Scientific Affairs LLC.
CMRO peer reviewers on this manuscript have received an honorarium from CMRO for their review work, but have no relevant financial or other relationships to disclose.
Acknowledgments
Previous presentation: Part of the material in this manuscript was presented at the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy (AMCP) Nexus 2018 Congress (October 22-25, 2018 Orlando, FL).
Data availability statement: The authors declare that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplementary information files.