1,519
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Infectious Diseases

Missing diagnoses of congenital cytomegalovirus infection in electronic health records for infants with laboratory-confirmed infection

, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, , & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 273-275 | Received 27 Jul 2021, Accepted 08 Nov 2021, Published online: 06 Dec 2021

Abstract

Congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a leading cause of non-genetic sensorineural hearing loss and neurodevelopmental disabilities among US children. Studies using administrative healthcare databases have identified infants with congenital CMV using diagnostic codes from the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification. Using Cerner Health Facts deidentified electronic health records, we assessed the sensitivity of CMV diagnostic codes among infants with laboratory confirmed congenital CMV infection (i.e. a positive CMV laboratory test – polymerase chain reaction, direct fluorescent antibody, or culture from urine, saliva, respiratory secretion or blood samples, or IgM serology – within 21 days of life). During 2010–2017, 668 congenital CMV cases were identified among 7,517,207 infants with encounters within 21 days of life, or 0.89 cases per 10,000 infants. The sensitivity of CMV diagnostic codes assigned within 21 and 90 days of life was 10.3% (95% CI: 8.2–12.9) and 11.1% (95% CI: 8.9–13.7), respectively.

Congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a leading cause of non-genetic sensorineural hearing loss and neurodevelopmental disabilities in children born in the United States, and is associated with a seven-fold increased prevalence of microcephalyCitation1,Citation2. Although universal newborn screening for CMV is not currently recommended in the United States, a few states and health care systems have implemented targeted screening for infants who do not pass the newborn hearing screeningCitation3–5.

The prevalence of congenital CMV ascertained through diagnostic codes from the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM; ICD-10-CM) using large healthcare databases in the United States ranges from 0.9 to 3.3 per 10,000 live birthsCitation6. In comparison, the prevalence of symptomatic congenital CMV disease in a retrospective chart review of >30,000 infants was 2.9 per 10,000 live births, with CMV testing performed most consistently for investigating microcephaly and low birth weightCitation7. However, the sensitivity of diagnostic codes and the extent to which congenital CMV infection is ascertained through laboratory testing in clinical practice is unknown.

We used deidentified electronic health records (EHRs) to assess the sensitivity of CMV diagnostic codes among infants with laboratory confirmed CMV infection, overall and by geographic region. We used 2010–2017 data from 349 facilities that provided CMV laboratory data to Cerner Health Facts, a nationally distributed EHR data warehouse. A congenital CMV case was defined as an infant with a positive CMV laboratory test (i.e. polymerase chain reaction [PCR], direct fluorescent antibody [DFA], or culture from urine, saliva, respiratory secretion or blood samples, or IgM serology) within 21 days of life. Prevalence of congenital CMV was calculated as the number of cases per 10,000 infants with encounters within 21 days of life. Among congenital CMV cases, diagnostic data were searched for CMV codes (ICD 9: 078.5, B25.x; ICD10: 771.1 and P35.1) and congenital CMV-related conditions within 90 days of life (up to 6 years for hearing loss). The sensitivity of CMV diagnostic codes was the proportion of congenital CMV cases with a CMV diagnostic code within either 21 or 90 days of life, to allow for delay in diagnostic code assignmentsCitation8. Data analysis was performed using R and SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).

During 2010–2017, 668 congenital CMV laboratory-confirmed cases were identified among 7,517,207 infants with encounters within 21 days of life, or 0.89 cases per 10,000 infants (). Most (96%) were identified through just one laboratory method, including 513 (77%) through culture, 60 (9%) PCR, 44 (7%) IgM, 23 (3%) DFA; 28 (4%) had results reported using more than one method. Most (97%) cultures were performed using urine samples. The sensitivity of CMV diagnostic codes assigned within 21 and 90 days of life was 10.3% (95% CI: 8.2, 12.9) and 11.1% (95% CI: 8.9, 13.7), respectively. The most common congenital CMV-related conditions were low birth weight, jaundice and thrombocytopenia ().

Table 1. Prevalence of congenital CMV infection and sensitivity of CMV ICD-9/10-CM diagnostic codes by region.

Table 2. Congenital CMV-related conditions among infants with congenital CMV within 21 and 22–90 days of life.

In this study, we found that just one out of ten infants with laboratory-confirmed congenital CMV infection were assigned a CMV diagnostic code in their EHR. The low sensitivity may be attributable to missing diagnostic code data and varying CMV diagnostic code assignment protocols. Used primarily for billing purposes, diagnostic codes may better reflect administrative practices for reimbursement within health systems than the true number of laboratory-confirmed cases.

Prevalence of congenital CMV and sensitivity of diagnostic codes varied by region (). The Northeast had the highest prevalence, albeit the lowest sensitivity, which may indicate missing laboratory data in other regions and, possibly, varying testing practices by region. Laboratory data in EHRs have the potential to expand previous administrative capabilities in identifying infants with congenital CMV infection. However, gaps in completeness and regional variation due to different EHR utilization practices might be important limitationsCitation9.

Despite widespread availability of PCR testing, a minority of cases in this study were identified by PCR. Missing or uninterpretable PCR results may have led to a relatively low prevalence compared to other studies using administrative dataCitation3. Among congenital CMV cases, a very low number were diagnosed by IgM testing or using respiratory secretions which are not recommended for diagnosing congenital CMV; excluding those would have little effect on the results reported. We could only assess certain, rather non-specific CMV-related conditions through diagnostic codes but not clinical notes to assess whether physicians recorded a diagnosis of symptomatic congenital CMV.

Although most congenital CMV cases were identified through culture within 21 days of life, they were not assigned a CMV diagnostic code, hence the low sensitivity. The turnaround time for culture results in some cases might have been longer than the hospital stay, and a subsequent diagnosis might not have been recorded in the Cerner data. However, available data indicate that the median length of hospital stay for infants with congenital CMV varies from 10 days for infants delivered vaginallyCitation10 to 98 days for very low birth weight and premature infants admitted to neonatal intensive care unitsCitation11. Assessing the specificity and positive predictive value of CMV diagnostic codes, frequency of antiviral treatment and length of hospital stay among infants with congenital CMV was outside the scope of this study but is warranted in the future. Continued caution is needed in interpreting administrative data on congenital CMV, since most children with congenital CMV infection are not assigned diagnostic codes for CMV even if they have laboratory confirmation of the diagnosis.

Transparency

Declaration of funding

This work was supported in part by the Intramural Research Program at NIAID, NIH and NIH Clinical Center.

Declaration of financial/other relationships

The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.

CMRO peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial or other relationships to disclose.

Acknowledgements

Disclaimer: The findings and conclusions in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the National Institutes of Health.

References

  • Messinger CJ, Lipsitch M, Bateman BT, et al. Association between congenital cytomegalovirus and the prevalence at birth of microcephaly in the United States. JAMA Pediatr. 2020;174(12):1159–1167.
  • Satterfield-Nash A, Umrigar A, Lanzieri TM. Etiology of prelingual hearing loss in the universal newborn hearing screening era: a scoping review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020;163(4):662–670.
  • Yassine BB, Hulkower R, Dollard S, et al. A legal mapping assessment of cytomegalovirus-related laws in the United States. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2021. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000001401
  • Ronner EA, Glovsky CK, Herrmann BS, et al. Congenital cytomegalovirus targeted screening implementation and outcomes: a retrospective chart review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/01945998211044125
  • Vancor E, Shapiro ED, Loyal J. Results of a targeted screening program for congenital cytomegalovirus infection in infants who fail newborn hearing screening. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2019;8(1):55–59.
  • Grosse SD, Leung J, Lanzieri TM. Identification of congenital CMV cases in administrative databases and implications for monitoring prevalence, healthcare utilization, and costs. Curr Med Res Opin. 2021;37(5):769–779.
  • Mahajan V, Patel J. Presentations of and testing practices for congenital CMV. Pediatrics. 2019;144(2 MeetingAbstract):674–674.
  • Leung J, Dollard SC, Grosse SD, et al. Valganciclovir use among commercially and Medicaid-insured infants with congenital CMV infection in the United States, 2009–2015. Clin Ther. 2018;40(3):430–439 e1.
  • Glynn EF, Hoffman MA. Heterogeneity introduced by EHR system implementation in a de-identified data resource from 100 non-affiliated organizations. JAMIA Open. 2019;2(4):554–561.
  • Meyers J, Sinha A, Samant S, et al. The economic burden of congenital cytomegalovirus disease in the first year of life: a retrospective analysis of health insurance claims data in the United States. Clin Ther. 2019;41(6):1040–1056 e3.
  • Tran C, Bennett MV, Gould JB, et al. Cytomegalovirus infection among infants in neonatal intensive care units, California, 2005 to 2016. Am J Perinatol. 2020;37(2):146–150.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.