Biopsy strategies for intermediate and high suspicion thyroid nodules with macrocalcifications

Abstract

Objectives

(1) To find strategies to improve diagnostic performance of ultrasound-guided biopsy of intermediate and high suspicion thyroid nodules with macrocalcifications. (2) To find malignancy rates of nodules with macrocalcification.

Materials and methods

From 2018 to 2022, fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) and core needle biopsy (CNB) were retrospectively evaluated. Macrocalcifications were categorized into three types: intra-nodular, rim and entirely calcified. Diagnostic performance was compared between biopsy modes (FNAB vs. CNB) and FNAB techniques (to-and-fro vs. whirling). Multivariate logistic regression was performed to determine features associated with performance of FNAB. Malignancy rates were calculated according to macrocalcification types.

Results

A total of 114 procedures (87 FNAB and 27 CNB) in 89 nodules per 86 patients (mean age, 64 years; 76 women) were performed. Overall, CNB performed better than FNAB (unsatisfactory rate: 3.7% vs. 33.3%, p = .005). For macrocalcification thicker than 2 mm, whirling FNAB technique demonstrated a comparable unsatisfactory rate with statistical trends toward significance (to-and-fro: 69.2% vs. whirling: 27.8%, p = .055). The entirely calcified nodule was associated with poor performance of FNAB (adjusted odds ratio 4.46 [95% CI: 1.19–16.67], p = .027). Overall malignancy was 22.5%, higher in intra-nodular macrocalcification than rim and entirely calcified types (68.4% vs. 21.1% vs. 10.5%, p = .025).

Conclusion

For the entirely calcified type, CNB should be considered first to improve diagnosis. For other types, FNAB can be performed, and whirling technique may be an alternative technique in thicker macrocalcification. Malignancy in intermediate and high suspicion nodules with macrocalcification have non-negligible rates.

Keywords:

• Thyroid
• ultrasonography
• biopsy
• calcification

Transparency

Declaration of funding

This paper was not funded.

Declaration of financial/other relationships

The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.

Peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial or other relationships to disclose.

Author contributions

Concept and design: S.K. and J.H.S.; data collection: all authors; data analysis and interpretation: all authors; the drafting of the paper: S.K. and J.H.S.; critical revision: all authors; final approval of the version to be published: all authors.

Acknowledgements

None.