Abstract
Objective
The incidence and factors associated with chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) after ambulatory surgeries have not been well studied. Our primary objective was to determine the incidence of CPSP and secondary objectives included assessment of intensity of CPSP, incidence of moderate-to-severe CPSP, and exploration of factors associated with CPSP.
Methods
This is a prospective cohort study of ambulatory surgery patients having procedures with a potential to cause moderate-to-severe postoperative pain. All patients had participated in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) showing no difference in achieving satisfactory analgesia in a recovery unit with either morphine or hydromorphone. CPSP was defined as chronic pain that developed or increased in intensity after the surgical procedure and is localized to the surgical field or within the innervation territory of a nerve in the surgical field, and has persisted for 3 months post-surgery, with the exclusion of other causes of pain. Incidences of CPSP were reported as rate (%) with 95% CI, and intensity using a 0–10 numerical rating scale (95% CI). We used logistic regression to explore factors associated with CPSP adjusting for baseline catastrophizing and depression.
Results
Among 402 RCT patients, 208 provided data for the 3-month outcome. Incidence of CPSP was 18.8% (39/208), 95% CI = 13.7%–24.7% and 78% (28/39) of them had moderate-to-severe CPSP. Average CPSP intensity was 5.5, 95% CI = 4.7–6.4. Every unit increase in pain over the first 24 h was significantly associated with increased odds of moderate-to-severe CPSP at 3 months; odds ratio = 1.28, 95% CI = 1.04–1.58.
Conclusions
Nearly one in five patients develop CPSP after ambulatory surgeries with the majority of them having moderate-to-severe pain. Considering that acute pain after discharge is associated with CPSP and that there are no formal care pathways to address this need, studies need to focus on evaluating feasible strategies to provide continuing care.
Transparency
Declaration of funding
The original randomized controlled trial was funded as AbbVie New Investigator Award in Anesthesia for HS and by the Canadian Anesthesia Research Foundation-CAS-2014-038 and supported by the Department of Anesthesia, McMaster University.
Declaration of financial/other relationships
The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.
Peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial or other relationships to disclose.
Author contributions
HS: Study idea, conduct of the study, study reporting and drafting the manuscript. LW: Statistical analysis and drafting the manuscript. JP: Study idea, site lead for the study, and drafting the manuscript. PL: Study idea, surgical lead for the study, and drafting the manuscript. PJD: Study idea, methodology, and drafting the manuscript. MB: Study idea, methodology, and drafting the manuscript. LT: Study idea, methodology, and drafting the manuscript.
Acknowledgements
The authors are thankful to the following people for their assistance in conducting this research and data collection: Toni Tidy (research coordinator), Sushmitha Pallapothu, and Ahana G. Harsha. We thank Sara Miller, Scientific Editor, for her assistance with this manuscript submission.