273
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research articles

Assessing EDR and a novel deer repellent for reducing by-kill of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus), during aerial 1080 operations

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &
Pages 199-214 | Received 23 Mar 2021, Accepted 07 Sep 2021, Published online: 04 Oct 2021
 

ABSTRACT

A 2014 carcass search survey confirmed that Tiakina Ngā Manu aerial 1080 operations, undertaken to protect resident mohua (Mohoua ochrocephala) from increases to predator populations following substantial beech (Nothofagus sp.) mast events, cause mortality for Wakatipu white-tailed deer. Non-target by-kill of deer generates significant public opposition to predator control operations. We assessed if a current deer repellent (EDR) and a repellent in development (Pestex-DR) were effective at repelling captive white-tailed deer from consumption of nontoxic baits, commonly used in Tiakina Ngā Manu operations. Both repellents were found to significantly decrease bait consumption, and we observed clear displays of aversion to repellent baits by captive deer. Ten GPS collared wild white-tailed deer were then monitored following a Tiakina Ngā Manu operation using EDR in 2016. One collared deer was poisoned following the operation, confirming that EDR is not 100% effective. We recommend the most effective available deer repellent be used for future Tiakina Ngā Manu operations over the Wakatipu white-tailed deer habitat to minimise public opposition to these predator control operations. In addition, our results suggest that differences in the boundary size and shape of operations may account for some of the variability in non-target by-kill observed between studies.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Department of Conservation for supplying both the non-toxic RS5 cereal bait without repellent and bait coated in Epro deer repellent for use in the captive trial, also for permissions to undertake research and flexibility when method alteration was required. The authors also thank Pest Control Research Ltd for supplying their RS5 cereal baits with incorporated double strength Pestex-DR repellent. Garry Ottmann from the Game Animal Council provided a collar and assistance in collaring the deer. Sir Richard Hayes and his net gun operator assisted in deer capture and relocation. Grant Morriss (Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research) assisted in method development. Lastly, the authors gratefully acknowledge Mr Marcus Pinney for allowing me to conduct the captive trial on his white-tailed deer.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

The following provided funding without which we could not have undertaken the wild deer monitoring: EPRO Ltd, Safari Club International (NZ Chapter) and the New Zealand Deerstalkers Association (NZDA), particularly Wellington and Marlborough Branches and various individual donations to the ‘Givealittle’ page.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 224.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.