Publication Cover
International Interactions
Empirical and Theoretical Research in International Relations
Volume 37, 2011 - Issue 3
572
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Note

Can Unilateral Leadership Promote International Environmental Cooperation?

Pages 320-339 | Published online: 01 Sep 2011
 

Abstract

Why do governments sometimes exercise unilateral leadership in international environmental cooperation, such as the mitigation of global climate change? It is usually the case that unilateral leadership cannot solve the problem at hand, so it is not clear what the benefits of unilateral leadership are. In this article, I provide a new political rationale for unilateral leadership. I show that if a green politician (worried about environmental destruction) fears that he or she will probably lose power soon, he or she may want to unilaterally implement domestic mitigation policies to reduce the domestic cost of mitigation in the future. By exercising unilateral leadership, this politician ensures that even a future brown politician (only mildly interested in environmental protection) is, due to the domestic cost reduction, willing to engage in international cooperation. The findings imply that while unilateral leadership is not a panacea, it may be a useful commitment device under empirically plausible conditions.

Acknowledgments

I thank Andrew Cheon, Ram Fishman, the anonymous reviewers, and the editors of International Interactions for valuable comments and advice.

Notes

1To be sure, the technology coefficient may be higher than the learning curve indicates because the marginal cost of additional clean technology increases as the most lucrative market niches have already been used.

2It is not necessary to analyze green-brown and brown-green separately because the model is symmetric.

3Given that the United States Senate failed to pass federal climate legislation prior to the 2009 Copenhagen conference, the European Union was nonetheless unable to “seal the deal” for a global climate treaty to follow the Kyoto Protocol after the year 2012. This failure is consistent with the model, as the benefits of unilateral leadership are probabilistic.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 640.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.