![Sample our Education journals, sign in here to start your access, latest two full volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5932/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Education.jpg"})
Abstract
Following an earlier survey of the attitudes and activities of academic staff who had retired three to five years earlier, a survey was undertaken of the policies and practices of university authorities in relation to supporting the academic activities of their retired staff. The sample included 21 universities in England and Scotland, and 28 Oxford and Cambridge colleges. Very few universities had a formal policy, generally leaving it to departments and faculties to provided facilities if and as they wished. There was a wide variation in the extent of support offered, in the criteria for allocating support and the length of time for which it was provided. It was unusual for authorities to be explicit and transparent about these policies. It is argued that a key factor in the provision of support is whether it is seen as a privilege, or as a cost‐effective way of contributing to the work and reputation of the university.
Notes
* Thomas Coram Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London, 27/28 Woburn Square, London, WC1H 0AA, UK. Email: [email protected]
On the basis of the survey findings reported above, which were discussed at a meeting of senior academics and university administrators, the British Academy and the Royal Society of Edinburgh decided to write to Vice‐Chancellors pointing out that retired academic staff who wish to continue to contribute to scholarship and research are an important potential resource for universities. They can enhance learning, strengthen research performance and publications, and advise junior staff, and their contribution can be greatly facilitated by transparent and explicit policies, by recognition, and by access to certain facilities, the provision of which is likely to prove cost‐effective.