3,015
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Special Issue: Inequalities and the Curriculum

Young people’s views on choice and fairness through their experiences of curriculum as examination specifications at GCSEFootnote

&
Pages 19-36 | Published online: 12 Feb 2018
 

Abstract

This paper presents data that consider ways in which young people experience the curriculum through the lens of subject examination syllabuses (for GCSEs), their associated assessment techniques and structures, and educational policies at national and school level concerning subject choice. Drawing upon an original qualitative dataset from a mixed-methods study of students’ views and experiences of GCSE from Northern Ireland (NI) and Wales, the paper explores students’ perceptions of choice and fairness in relation to studying various subjects at GCSE. Factors of importance are the subjects available to them through subject option selections at the school level and the ways in which GCSE courses are then administered. In relation to notions of choice and fairness, the paper considers how students see access to the curriculum moderated by national- and school-level decisions regarding the assessment of GCSEs; the extent to which assessment techniques such as tiering, controlled assessment, and modularity, as well as school-level policy decisions about timing of entry to GCSEs (known as early entry) all combine to restrict students’ access to the full range of subjects and influence the ways in which they experience these subjects as curricula within their particular school settings.

Notes

This article was originally published with errors. This version has been corrected/amended. Please see Erratum (https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2018.1409964).

1. Learning for Life and Work is a compulsory GCSE in Northern Ireland. The course content covers a range of different topics, including human rights, democracy, citizenship, relationships, and employment. It is designed to ‘provide students with the skills they require to think independently, make informed decisions, and take appropriate action when faced with personal, social, economic and employment issues’ (CCEA, 2016).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 385.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.