Abstract
Placing labor at the center of the global ‘land-grab’ debate helps sharpen critical insights at two scales. At the scale of agricultural enterprises, a labor perspective highlights the jobs generated, and the rewards received, by people who work in and around large farms. This approach guides my critical reading of the report prepared by a World Bank team that argues for large-scale land acquisition as a way to reduce poverty. Using data from within the report itself, I show why poverty reduction is a very unlikely result. I develop the argument further by drawing on research in colonial and contemporary Indonesia, where large-scale plantations and associated smallholder contract schemes have a long history. A labor perspective is also relevant at the national and transnational scale, where it highlights the predicament of people whose labor is not needed by the global capitalist system. In much of the global South, the anticipated transition from the farm to factory has not taken place and education offers no solution, as vast numbers of educated people are unemployed. Unless vast numbers of jobs are created, or a global basic income grant is devised to redistribute the wealth generated in highly productive but labor-displacing ventures, any program that robs rural people of their foothold on the land must be firmly rejected.
Notes
1See, for example, Kregg Hetherington's description of Paraguayan farmers attempting to fend off the cross border tide of Brazilian soy (Hetherington Citation2009).
2Two independent studies found that established plantations require around 84 work days per hectare per year, or roughly one person per four hectares (Friends of the Earth et al. Citation2008, 78). Highly efficient oil palm operations in Malaysia employ one person per 10 hectares, including the mill (Tunku Mohd Nazim Yakob, email 23 January 2009).
3Smallholder farming has its own problems, not least the new inequalities that arise through the ‘everyday’ processes of accumulation and dispossession among smallholders that roll on relentlessly, despite efforts to prevent them (Hall et al. Citation2011; Li Citation2010a; Bernstein Citation2010).
4For a concise introduction to this literature, see Bernstein (Citation2010a).
7Michael Watts (Citation1990) outlines many additional problems with contract farming.
8My report is based on field research I conducted in 2009 together with Arianto Sangaji of the NGO Yayasan Tanah Merdeka and Sawit Watch. For more general discussions of the welfare implications of different smallholder styles and contract models in the oil palm sector see: McCarthy and Cramb (Citation2009), Zen et al. (Citation2008), Rist, Feintrenie, and Levang (Citation2010), McCarthy (Citation2010). See also the remarkable quantitative comparison of different smallholder schemes in Malaysia by Cramb and Ferraro (Citation2010), cited in the RGIF report (36).
9On the symbolic valence of the terms nucleus and plasma, and for an overview of Indonesia's contract farming schemes, see White (Citation1999).
10Incidentally, this arrangement is also favorable to government officials, from village headmen upwards, who fraudulently enter the names of their family members on the register of households who have handed over land for development, and receive a share of dividends. In practice, they have no idea where ‘their’ land is located, and do not need to know, since they have no role in management. They use the scheme to obtain income without investing any land, labor or capital at all. I have encountered this practice at both Sulawesi research sites and in West Kalimantan. The schemes also work well for absentees, who buy up land, place it under company management, and wait for their monthly checks.
11The 1997 Transmigration Law, revised in 2009, obliges the company to provide ‘a guarantee of a sufficient income to live decently’ (Government of Indonesia Citation2009, paragraph 14.3), but it is difficult to see how it could be enforced even in the short run, still less across several generations. Conversion of land to oil palm requires a radical restructuring of the landscape. There is no return to the status quo ante, and there is virtually nothing any government department can do about delinquent corporations, sustainability ‘standards’ notwithstanding.
Hetherington
,
K
.
2009
.
Privatizing the private in rural Paraguay: precarious lots and the materiality of rights
.
American Ethnologist
,
36
(
2
)
:
224
–
41
.
Friends of the Earth
,
LifeMosaic
and
Sawit Watch
.
2008
.
Losing ground: the human rights impacts of oil palm plantation expansion in Indonesia
Friends of the Earth, LifeMosaic, and Sawit Watch
Hall
,
D.
,
Hirsch
,
P
and
Li
,
T. M
.
2011
.
Powers of exclusion: land dilemmas in Southeast Asia
,
Singapore
:
NUS Press
.
Li
,
T. M
.
2010a
.
Indigeneity, capitalism, and the management of dispossession
.
Current Anthropology
,
51
(
3
)
:
385
–
414
.
Bernstein
,
H
.
2010b
.
“
Globalisation, neoliberalism, labour, with reference to South Africa
”
. In
Transitions to neoliberalism in middle-income countries: policy dilemmas, economic crises, mass resistance
,
Edited by:
Saad-Filho
,
A
and
Yalman
,
G. L
.
London
:
Routledge
.
Bernstein
,
H.
2010a
.
Class dynamics of agrarian change
,
Halifax
:
Fernwood Publishing
.
World Bank
.
2008
.
World Development Report: Agriculture for Development
,
Washington, DC
:
World Bank
.
Rigg
,
J
.
2007
.
Moving lives: migration and livelihoods in the Lao PDR
.
Population, Space and Place
,
13
:
163
–
78
.
Mosse
,
D
.
Power and the durability of poverty: a critical exploration of the links between culture, marginality and chronic poverty
.
CPRC Working Paper 107
.
Manchester
:
Chronic Poverty Research Centre
.
Rutherford
,
B
.
2008
.
Conditional belonging: farm workers and the cultural politics of recognition in Zimbabwe
.
Development and Change
,
39
(
1
)
:
73
–
99
.
Watts
,
M
.
1990
.
“
Peasants under contract: agro-food complexes in the Third World
”
. In
The food question: profit versus people?
,
Edited by:
Bernstein
,
H
.
New York
:
Monthly Review Press
.
McCarthy
,
J.
and
Cramb
,
R
.
2009
.
Policy narratives, landholder engagement, and oil palm expansion on the Malaysian and Indonesian frontiers
.
The Geographical Journal
,
175
(
2
)
:
112
–
123
.
Zen
,
Z.
,
McCarthy
,
J. F
and
Gillespie
,
P
.
2008
.
“
Linking pro-poor policy and oil palm cultivation
”
.
The Australian National University
.
Australia Indonesia Governance Research Partnership, Crawford School of Economics and Government, College of Asia and the Pacific
Rist
,
L.
,
Feintrenie
,
L
and
Levang
,
P
.
2010
.
The livelihood impacts of oil palm: smallholders in Indonesia
.
Diodversity Conservation
,
19
:
1009
–
1024
.
McCarthy
,
J
.
2010
.
Processes of inclusion and adverse incorporation: oil palm and agrarian change in Sumatra, Indonesia
.
Journal of Peasant Studies
,
37
(
4
)
:
821
–
850
.
Cramb
,
R. A
and
Ferraro
,
D
.
Custom and capital: a financial appraisal of alternative arrangements for large-scale oil palm development on customary land in Sarawak, Malaysia
.
54th Annual Conference of the Australian Agricultural and Resource Economic Society
.
Adelaide.
White
,
B
.
1999
.
“
Nucleus and plasma: contract farming and the exercise of power in Upland West Java
”
. In
Transforming the Indonesian Uplands: marginality, power and production
,
Edited by:
Li
,
T. M
.
Amsterdam
:
Harwood Academic
.
Government of Indonesia
.
2009
.
“
UU Republik Indonesia Nomor 29 Tahun 2009 Tentang Perubahan atas UU Nomor 15 Tahun 1997 tentang Ketransmigrasian
”
.
Kiely
,
R
.
2009
.
“
The globalization of manufacturing production: Warrenite fantasies and uneven and unequal realities
”
. In
Peasants and globalization: political economy, rural transformation and the agrarian question
,
Edited by:
Akram-Lodhi
,
A. H
and
Kay
,
C
.
London
:
Routledge
.
Araghi
,
F
.
2009
.
“
The invisible hand and the visible foot: peasants, dispossession and globalization
”
. In
Peasants and globalization: political economy, rural transformation, and the agrarian question
,
Edited by:
Akram-Lodhi
,
A. H
and
Kay
,
C
.
London
:
Routledge
.
Watts
,
M
.
2009
.
“
The southern question: agrarian questions of labour and capital
”
. In
Peasants and globalization: political economy, rural transformation, and the agrarian question
,
Edited by:
Akram-Lodhi
,
A. H
and
Kay
,
C
.
London
:
Routledge
.
Akram-Lodhi
,
A. H.
and
Kay
,
C
.
2009
.
“
The agrarian question: peasants and rural change
”
. In
Peasants and globalization: political economy, rural transformation, and the agrarian question
,
Edited by:
Akram-Lodhi
,
A. H
and
Kay
,
C
.
London
:
Routledge
.
Bernstein
,
H
.
2010b
.
“
Globalisation, neoliberalism, labour, with reference to South Africa
”
. In
Transitions to neoliberalism in middle-income countries: policy dilemmas, economic crises, mass resistance
,
Edited by:
Saad-Filho
,
A
and
Yalman
,
G. L
.
London
:
Routledge
.
Hall
,
D.
,
Hirsch
,
P
and
Li
,
T. M
.
2011
.
Powers of exclusion: land dilemmas in Southeast Asia
,
Singapore
:
NUS Press
.
Hall
,
D
.
2009
.
The 2008 World Development Report and the political economy of Southeast Asian agriculture
.
Journal of Peasant Studies
,
36
(
3
)
:
603
–
609
.
Li
,
T. M
.
2010b
.
To make live or let die? Rural dispossession and the protection of surplus populations
.
Antipode
,
41
(
s1
)
:
63
–
93
.
Elson
,
R
.
1997
.
The end of the peasantry in Southeast Asia: a social and economic history of peasant livelihood
,
London
:
MacMillan Press
.
Rigg
,
J
.
2006
.
Land, farming, livelihoods, and poverty: rethinking the links in the Rural South
.
World Development
,
34
(
1
)
:
180
–
202
.
Bryceson
,
D.
,
Kay
,
C
and
Mooij
,
J
.
2000
.
Disappearing peasantries? Rural labour in Africa, Asia and Latin America
,
London
:
ITDG
.
Hall
,
D.
,
Hirsch
,
P
and
Li
,
T. M
.
2011
.
Powers of exclusion: land dilemmas in Southeast Asia
,
Singapore
:
NUS Press
.
Hall
,
D
.
2009
.
The 2008 World Development Report and the political economy of Southeast Asian agriculture
.
Journal of Peasant Studies
,
36
(
3
)
:
603
–
609
.
Additional information
Notes on contributors
Tania Murray Li
Thanks to JPS editor Jun Borras for inviting me to contribute to this forum, and to Jun Borras, Haroon Akram-Lodhi, Derek Hall, Kregg Hetherington and Gavin Smith for their critical input.