Abstract
This two-part article surveys the origin, development and current meaning of the ‘agrarian question’. Part One of the survey explored the history of the agrarian question, elaborating its origin in the work of Marx, Engels, Kautsky, and Lenin, and its development in the work of Preobrazhensky, Dobb, Brenner, and others. Part Two of the survey identifies seven current variants of the agrarian question and critically interrogates these variants in order to understand whether, and if so, how, the location of small-scale petty commodity food and farm production within contemporary capitalism has been reconfigured during the era of neoliberal globalisation. Together, the two parts of the survey argue that the agrarian question continues to offer a rigorously flexible framework by which to undertake a historically-informed and country-specific analysis of the material conditions governing rural production, reproduction, and the process of agrarian accumulation or its lack thereof, a process that is located within the law of value and market imperatives that operate on a world scale.
Notes
1The analytical complexities of the term ‘peasant’ were discussed in Part One of this survey.
2In an even earlier, albeit more limited, attempt Byres (Citation1977) already tackled the agrarian question in a comparative and contemporary context. For a comparative analysis of the transition to agrarian capitalism between Europe and Latin America, see Kay (Citation1974), and between South Korea, Taiwan and Latin America, see Kay (Citation2002).
3In addition to those already mentioned in part one of this survey (Akram-Lodhi and Kay Citation2010), see Harris (Citation1978), Harriss (Citation1980), de Janvry (Citation1981), Murray and Post (Citation1983), Cox and Littlejohn (Citation1984), Pearce (Citation1985), Saith (Citation1985), Mamdani (Citation1987), Levin and Neocosmos (Citation1989), Watts (Citation1989, Citation2002), Brass (Citation1990), van der Ploeg (Citation1993), Roseberry (Citation1993), Drew (Citation1996), McLaughlin (Citation1998) and O'Laughlin (Citation2009), amongst others.
4Important contributions to dependency theory with implications for the agrarian question and agrarian transition include Frank (Citation1967), Emmanuel (Citation1969), Sunkel (Citation1969), Dos Santos (Citation1973), Furtado (Citation1973), Amin (Citation1974) Thomas (Citation1974), Palma (Citation1978), Cardoso and Faletto (Citation1979), Kay (Citation1989), Larraín (Citation1989), Weeks (Citation1991), and Saul and Leys (2006).
5The mode of production debate is very much rooted in the concerns of the agrarian question, and can be considered an attempt to apply the analytical framework of the agrarian question to specific circumstances. The mode of production debate can be broadly portioned in two: the contributions of French anthropologists working in an Althusserian tradition, such as Rey (Citation1971, Citation1973, Citation1975) and Meillassoux (Citation1980), amongst others; and the debate over the development of capitalism in rural India, including Patnaik (Citation1971, Citation1972), Chattopadhyay (Citation1972a, Citation1972b), Thorner (Citation1982) and a host of others. Important general contributions to the mode of production debate include Banaji (Citation1972, Citation1977), Laclau (Citation1977) and Taylor (Citation1979).
7The reality was different. Undervalued agricultural products subsidised the growth of an urban proletariat and undermined agriculture, while this period was also marked by the rise of cheap food imports in many developing countries, which further undermined domestic agriculture.
8While Clapp (Citation2009) and Ghosh (Citation2010) stress that the entanglement of finance capital with agriculture has dramatically increased, this is not about facilitating the accumulation of surplus value but rather about reallocating existing stocks of surplus value.
9Some might argue that agriculture's importance to capital is now as a source of agrofuels. However, despite massive US investment in agrofuels they account for only a small share of its gasoline usage, and agrofuels do not have the potential to power capitalist production. What they do demonstrate, though, are the stark biophysical contradictions of the global food system.
10For a similar mode of analysis, see FitzGerald (Citation1985).
11For a political economy analysis of the ongoing world food crisis, see the symposium articles in the Journal of Agrarian Change 10(1), 2010.
Byres
,
T. J.
1977
.
Agrarian transition and the agrarian question
.
The Journal of Peasant Studies
,
4
(
3
)
:
258
–
74
.
Kay
,
C.
1974
.
Comparative analysis of the European manorial system and the Latin American hacienda system
.
The Journal of Peasant Studies
,
2
(
1
)
:
69
–
98
.
Kay
,
C.
2002
.
Why East Asia overtook Latin America: agrarian reform, industrialisation and development
.
Third World Quarterly
,
23
(
6
)
:
1073
–
102
.
Akram-Lodhi
,
A. H.
and
Kay
,
C.
2010
.
Surveying the agrarian question (I): unearthing foundations, exploring diversity
.
The Journal of Peasant Studies
,
37
(
1
)
:
177
–
202
.
Harris
,
R.
1978
.
Marxism and the agrarian question in Latin America
.
Latin American Perspectives
,
5
(
4
)
:
2
–
26
.
Harriss
,
J.
Contemporary Marxist analysis of the agrarian question in India. Madras Institute of Development Studies
.
Working Paper No. 14
.
Madras
:
Institute of Development Studies
.
de Janvry
,
A.
1981
.
The agrarian question and reformism in Latin America
,
Baltimore
,
MD
:
John Hopkins University Press
.
Murray
,
M. J.
and
Post
,
C.
1983
.
The ‘agrarian question’, class struggle and the capitalist state in the United States and South Africa
.
The Insurgent Sociologist
,
9
(
4
)
:
37
–
56
.
Cox
T.
G.
Littlejohn
1984
Kritsman and the agrarian Marxists
London
Frank Cass
Pearce
,
R.
1985
.
“
The agrarian question
”
. In
Developing contemporary Marxism
,
Edited by:
Baranski
,
Z. G.
and
Short
,
J. R.
London
:
Macmillan, pp. 58–85
.
Saith
,
A.
1985
.
The agrarian question in socialist transitions
,
London
:
Frank Cass
.
Mamdani
,
M.
1987
.
Extreme but not exceptional: towards an analysis of the agrarian question in Uganda
.
The Journal of Peasant Studies
,
14
(
2
)
:
191
–
225
.
Levin
,
R.
and
Neocosmos
,
M.
1989
.
The agrarian question and class contradictions in South Africa: some theoretical considerations
.
The Journal of Peasant Studies
,
16
(
2
)
:
230
–
59
.
Watts
,
M. J.
1989
.
The agrarian question in Africa: debating the crisis
.
Progress in Human Geography
,
13
(
1
)
:
1
–
41
.
Watts
,
M. J.
2002
.
Chronicle of a death foretold: some thought on peasants and the agrarian question
.
Österreichische Zeitschrift für Geschichtswissenschaften
,
13
(
4
)
:
22
–
50
.
Brass
,
T.
1990
.
Peasant essentialism and the agrarian question in the Colombian Andes
.
The Journal of Peasant Studies
,
17
(
3
)
:
444
–
56
.
van der Ploeg
,
J. D.
1993
.
Rural sociology and the new agrarian question
.
Sociologia Ruralis
,
33
(
2
)
:
240
–
60
.
Roseberry
,
W. W.
1993
.
“
Beyond the agrarian question in Latin America
”
. In
Confronting historical paradigms: peasants, labor, and the capitalist world system in Africa and Latin America
,
Edited by:
Cooper
,
F.
Madison
,
WI
:
University of Wisconsin Press
.
Drew
,
A.
1996
.
The theory and practice of the agrarian question in South African socialism
.
The Journal of Peasant Studies
,
23
(
2/3
)
:
53
–
92
.
McLaughlin
,
P.
1998
.
Rethinking the agrarian question: the limits of essentialism and the promise of evolutionism
.
Research in Human Ecology
,
5
(
2
)
:
25
–
39
.
O'Laughlin
,
B.
2009
.
“
Gender justice, land and the agrarian question in Southern Africa
”
. In
Peasants and globalization: political economy, rural transformation and the agrarian question
,
Edited by:
Akram-Lodhi
,
A. H.
and
Kay
,
C.
London
:
Routledge, pp. 190–213
.
Frank
,
A. G.
1967
.
Capitalism and underdevelopment in Latin America: historical studies of Chile and Brazil
,
New York
:
Monthly Review Press
.
Emmanuel
,
A.
1969
.
Unequal exchange: a study of the imperialism of trade
,
New York
:
Monthly Review Press
.
Sunkel
,
O.
1969
.
National development policy and external dependence in Latin America
.
Journal of Development Studies
,
6
(
1
)
:
23
–
48
.
Dos Santos
,
T.
1973
.
“
The crisis of development theory and the problem of dependence in Latin America
”
. In
Underdevelopment & development: the third world today
,
(2nd edition)
,
Edited by:
Bernstein
,
H.
Harmondsworth
:
Penguin Books, pp. 57–80
.
Furtado
,
C.
1973
.
“
The concept of external dependence in the study of underdevelopment
”
. In
The political economy of development and underdevelopment
,
Edited by:
Wilber
,
C. K.
New York
:
Random House, pp. 118–23
.
Amin
,
S.
1974
.
Accumulation on a world scale
,
New York
:
Monthly Review Books
.
Thomas
,
C.
1974
.
Development and transformation: the economics of the transition to socialism
,
New York
:
Monthly Review Press
.
Palma
,
G.
1978
.
Dependency: a formal theory of underdevelopment or a methodology for the analysis of concrete situations of underdevelopment?
.
World Development
,
6
(
7–8
)
:
881
–
924
.
Cardoso
,
F.
and
Faletto
,
E.
1979
.
Dependency and development in Latin America
,
Berkeley
,
CA
:
University of California Press
.
Kay
,
C.
1989
.
Latin American theories of development and underdevelopment
,
London
:
Routledge
.
Larraín
,
J.
1989
.
Theories of development
,
Cambridge
:
Polity Press
.
Weeks
,
J.
1991
.
“
Unequal exchange
”
. In
A dictionary of Marxist thought
,
(2nd edition)
,
Edited by:
Bottomore
,
T.
Oxford
:
Blackwell, pp. 557–59
.
Rey
,
P. P.
1971
.
Colonialisme, néo-colonialisme et transition au capitalisme
,
Paris
:
Maspero
.
Rey
,
P. P.
1973
.
Les alliances de classes
,
Paris
:
Maspero
.
Rey
,
P. P.
1975
.
The lineage mode of production
.
Critique of Anthropology
,
3
:
27
–
79
.
Meillassoux
,
C.
1980
.
“
From reproduction to production: a Marxist approach to economic anthropology
”
. In
The articulation of modes of production
,
Edited by:
Wolpe
,
H.
London
:
Routledge, pp. 189–201
.
Patnaik
,
U.
1971
.
Capitalist development in agriculture: a note
.
Economic and Political Weekly
,
6
(
39
)
:
A123
–
A124
.
+ A126–A130
Patnaik
,
U.
1972
.
On the mode of production in Indian agriculture: a reply
.
Economic and Political Weekly
,
7
(
40
)
:
A145
–
A151
.
Chattopadhyay
,
P.
1972a
.
On the question of the mode of production in Indian agriculture: a preliminary note
.
Economic and Political Weekly
,
7
(
13
)
:
A39+A41
–
A46
.
Chattopadhyay
,
P.
1972b
.
Mode of production in Indian agriculture: an ‘anti-kritik’
.
Economic and Political Weekly
,
7
(
53
)
:
A185
–
A192
.
Thorner
,
A.
1982
.
Semi-feudalism or capitalism? Contemporary debates on classes and modes of production in India
.
Economic and Political Weekly
,
17
(
49
)
:
1961
–
8
.
Banaji
,
J.
1972
.
For a theory of colonial modes of production
.
Economic and Political Weekly
,
7
(
52
)
:
2498
–
502
.
Banaji
,
J.
1977
.
Modes of production in a materialist conception of history
.
Capital & Class
,
3
:
1
–
44
.
Laclau
,
E.
1977
.
Politics and ideology in Marxist theory
,
London
:
New Left Books
.
Taylor
,
J.
1979
.
From modernization to modes of production
,
London
:
Macmillan
.
Leys
,
C.
1996
.
The rise and fall of development theory
,
Bloomington
:
Indiana University Press
.
Hyden
,
G.
1980
.
Beyond ujamma in Tanzania: underdevelopment and an uncaptured peasantry
,
Riverside
:
University of California Press
.
Gülap
,
H. N.
1986
.
Debate on capitalism and development: the theories of Samir Amin and Bill Warren
.
Capital & Class
,
28
:
139
–
59
.
Sender
,
J.
and
Smith
,
S.
1986
.
The development of capitalism in Africa
,
London
:
Methuen
.
Sender
,
J.
and
Smith
,
S.
1990
.
Poverty, class and gender in rural Africa: a Tanzanian case study
,
London
:
Routledge
.
Kiely
,
R.
2009
.
“
The globalization of manufacturing production: Warrenite fantasies and uneven and unequal realities
”
. In
Peasants and globalization: political economy, rural transformation and the agrarian question
,
Edited by:
Akram-Lodhi
,
A. H.
and
Kay
,
C.
London
:
Routledge, pp. 169–89
.
Clapp
,
J.
2009
.
Food price volatility and vulnerability in the global south: considering the global economic context
.
Third World Quarterly
,
30
(
6
)
:
1183
–
96
.
Ghosh
,
J.
2010
.
The unnatural coupling: food and global finance
.
Journal of Agrarian Change
,
10
(
1
)
:
76
–
91
.
FitzGerald
,
E. V.K.
1985
.
The problem of balance in the peripheral socialist economy: a conceptual note
.
World Development
,
13
(
1
)
:
5
–
14
.