![Sample our Earth Sciences journals, sign in here to start your access, latest two full volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5930/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Earth-Sciences.jpg"})
Abstract
Extraction recovery of 10 selected polycyclic aromatic nitrogen heterocycles (PANHs), quinoline, 2-methylquinoline, 6-methylquinoline, 8-methylquinoline, acridine, benzo[h]quinoline, phenantridine, indole, 2-methylindole, and carbazole from spiked soil samples was tested. Four different extraction techniques, pressurized solvent extraction (PSE), supercritical fluid extraction (SFE), Soxhlet warm extraction (SOXW) and standard Soxhlet extraction (SOX), were applied and compared. The RP-HPLC technique with a silica-based octadecyl stationary phase was used for recovery determination of individual PANHs. Supercritical fluid extraction has been found to be the most effective method for the extraction of selected PANHs from soil. PSE and SOXW methods offered similar results with slightly lower extraction recoveries compared with SFE. On the contrary, SOX is a time-consuming method with a low recovery of target analytes and is not suitable for the extraction of PANHs from soils.
Acknowledgements
This work was carried out under the project of the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports Czech Republic MSM 0021622412. The authors gratefully acknowledge Jiri Vejrosta for providing hardware devices for pressurized solvent extraction and supercritical fluid extraction. We would also like to thank Lea Lojkova, Pavel Karasek, and Anna Ciglerova, for their kind help during implementation of the experiments.